{"task_id":"st_01a0197d","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T10:02:46.563Z","updated_at":"2026-08-24T15:39:28.226Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v33","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v33","description":"Provenance v33 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exact v33 candidate 2a6bf1a844e1110e79bfbc59a92a1b8d7d9acc41f1614c1b2ad8f13906a92622, prefreeze/postfreeze and ledger line167. Independently recompute candidate/product/wheels/all bound tool hashes, profile receipt, socket transcripts, direct_url canonical/raw records, Ty 3.12 command/raw/fingerprint, authority chain, inventories/seals/test logs. Fresh rerun standalone cleaned bundle, hermetic Ty, bare bootstrap, rehydration; verify all historical candidates revoked/current v33 sole; resolve every line167 digest. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE. Read-only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"I read this as the final cryptographic release-provenance verdict - I completed the read-only audit and exact-environment reruns.\n\n# Cryptographic verdict: PASS\n\nCandidate `2a6bf1a844e1110e79bfbc59a92a1b8d7d9acc41f1614c1b2ad8f13906a92622` is internally consistent and is the sole current v33 candidate.\n\n- Independently resolved **all line 167 digests**, including candidate, source tree, three wheels, both seals, product binding, lifecycle evidence, authority files, test logs, and postfreeze proofs.\n- Candidate recomputation matched SHA-256 of canonical derivation inputs.\n- Hermes/profile/Ty wheels matched their bound hashes; all 109 wheel `RECORD` files validated.\n- All 17 qualification-tool hashes matched packaged or sealed tools.\n- Prefreeze inventory: 391 entries; immutable modes and hashes matched.\n- Postfreeze inventory: 55 files; seal, self-hash, sizes, modes, and artifact references matched.\n- Authority: 37 registry events and 37 ledger rows validated end-to-end; 18 predecessors revoked; only v33 remains active.\n- Source/installed socket transcript canonical hashes matched.\n- Canonical `direct_url` projections matched sealed wheel provenance. Raw path-dependent records correctly differed and made no equality claim.\n- Profile receipt and source-tree digest matched; retained result is `749 passed`.\n- Test receipts resolved: parser 204+204, lifecycle 131, focused 268, expanded 76, gateway 8514/0, direct-url attacks 32, Ty attacks 14.\n- Fresh exact-environment executions passed:\n  - standalone independent verifier\n  - bare frozen bootstrap\n  - explicit rehydration/final-state\n  - hermetic Ty\n- Fresh Ty result:\n  - interpreter `3.12.9`\n  - target `--python-version 3.12`, exactly once\n  - 810 diagnostics, zero capability diagnostics\n  - raw SHA-256 `f4a2265141525dc8005430e8afdf61145ff88c24a7fc00aad2d7609b3f2ce86a`\n  - semantic fingerprint `4b24118c95c05fa392f976a69034da7e7d24f63d098b32ef5c252537ab13da61`\n- Disposable audit roots were removed; release evidence remained untouched.\n\nThe generated `postfreeze-seal.json` is not retained in the prefreeze directory, but was independently reconstructed from the sealed inventory algorithm and reproduced its recorded SHA-256 exactly: `de56718d4f59699354840915f2ec82aaa6fad2ae1a0ecf7cf8a1d237cb1cfdc4`.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":425970,"turns":32,"tool_calls":72,"output_tokens":18979,"total_tokens":4890762,"generation_ms":386578,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":4.049437,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9949181409904317,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9523708260404866}}