{"task_id":"st_01a019b0","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T11:03:08.386Z","updated_at":"2026-08-24T16:57:06.227Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-objective-v36","task_summary":"Final objective audit for v36","description":"Objective v36 review","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final GOAL/CONSTRAINT audit for exact immutable candidate 1a8ba68a8312943b8918ef9029023aa97fc968fd2d9c0f316d7385232e0d7712, v36 prefreeze/postfreeze, ledger line168. Recheck every Task26 clause and every prior blocker: actual execution-bound profile receipt v2 (not synthetic), application-level complete process_update authority lease and injected post-commit update blocked before handler/mutation, protected controller, watcher/store=false, local socket, standalone cleaned bundle, direct_url v2, Ty3.12, final-state v7, 22 answers/seven clauses/exactly-once/cleanup. Return PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with evidence/residual risk. Read-only/offline; no Task27/release/live.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"I read this as the final objective/constraint audit of immutable v36 - I verified the sealed artifacts, critical code paths, and representative offline gates without release or live actions.\n\n## Bottom line\n\n**PASS** for the objective/constraint lane on candidate `1a8ba68a8312943b8918ef9029023aa97fc968fd2d9c0f316d7385232e0d7712`. Both prior blockers are closed: the profile receipt is execution-backed rather than synthetic, and complete PTB `process_update` dispatch is protected by the shared authority lease, with a server-delivered post-revocation update blocked before any handler entry or mutation.\n\nThis is not Task26 completion or release authorization; the other independent review lanes must also pass.\n\n## Action plan\n\n1. **Accept exact-candidate provenance.**\n   - Recomputed candidate digest from canonical derivation inputs: exact match.\n   - Ledger line 168 hashes match: Hermes `cf7685…`, profile `a56da2…`, prefreeze seal `ca3a42…`, postfreeze receipt seal `2ccf4d…`.\n   - All 391 inventoried prefreeze entries matched; 394 total files had correct `0400`/`0500` modes, no symlinks or writable paths.\n   - All 43 postfreeze-sealed artifacts matched their hashes.\n\n2. **Accept the former profile-receipt blocker as closed.**\n   - `write_profile_qualification_receipt` executes isolated pytest via `subprocess.run`; it does not accept caller-provided PASS text.\n   - Receipt file hash `11b5e964…`; runner `ef7c3ce7…`; manifest contains 749 unique collected/executed/passed IDs across 31 real test files.\n   - Bound evidence: Python `3.12.9`, executable hash `d9bc96d1…`, pytest `9.1.1`, source digest unchanged before/after, profile wheel `a56da2…`, raw stdout `749 passed`, empty stderr.\n   - Fewer-test, source-drift, coherent forgery, runner/log/receipt substitution cases reject.\n\n3. **Accept ingress authority and privacy closure.**\n   - Nutrition-enabled Telegram installs an application-level wrapper around PTB `process_update`.\n   - The wrapper acquires `LOCK_SH`, awaits the original complete dispatch, and releases in `finally`; revocation uses the same lock exclusively.\n   - Update-first, revoke-first, exception, and cancellation paths pass.\n   - Source and installed loopback transcripts each show one server-delivered post-revoke update, but `handler_entries=0`, `mutations=0`, watcher failure deliberately deferred, and socket/watcher cleanup true.\n   - Non-nutrition Telegram configurations bypass this Task26 wrapper.\n   - Watcher is event-driven `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero inotify watches. All three coaching completion paths set `store=False`.\n\n4. **Accept lifecycle clauses and final state.**\n   - Seven hash-chained clauses pass: 22 answers without re-asks; deterministic ambiguity/revision; preview isolation; projection-failure capability block; unknown-outcome no-retry; successful lifecycle; forward-resumed terminal cleanup.\n   - Protected production controller issues the one-use capability under external authority.\n   - Source and installed bundles each contain one transport call, one `sent_audited` delivery, one surface receipt, consumed capability, and duplicate rejection.\n   - No trainer paths, JSON fields, Python content, or wheel content were found.\n   - Direct URL projection v2, Python 3.12 Ty semantics, final-state v7, isolated frozen bootstrap, rehydration, tamper rejection, and cleanup all pass.\n   - Original and disposable v36 runtimes are absent; zero process, FD, socket, watcher, writable-path, or symlink residue.\n\n5. **Verification performed.**\n   - Sealed logs: profile 749; parser 204 source + 204 installed; lifecycle 131; focused 284; expanded 76; gateway 8,530/0 failures; direct-URL attacks 32; Ty-target attacks 14.\n   - Fresh targeted audit: **68 passed**, covering profile execution/forgery, runtime authority, update ordering, real loopback delivery, and transcript substitution.\n   - An initial ambient-Python async invocation lacked `pytest-asyncio`; rerunning with the project’s bound Python environment passed all affected tests.\n\n## Risks and mitigations\n\n- Evidence provides deterministic integrity, not external signatures, non-repudiation, or protection from a compromised operator/host; this limitation is explicit in the sealed trust boundary.\n- Ty reports 810 diagnostics outside the changed capability spans; zero capability-surface diagnostics are claimed, not whole-file cleanliness.\n- Loopback QA proves the real PTB/HTTP ingress mechanism without external Telegram traffic. It is not a new live-customer rehearsal, consistent with the amendment and this task’s no-live constraint.\n- Keep Task27 and release blocked until every remaining independent Task26 lane returns PASS.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":489809,"turns":25,"tool_calls":159,"output_tokens":22165,"total_tokens":5869854,"generation_ms":449917,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":8.108202,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9925296882450444,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9373740634975629}}