{"task_id":"st_01a019b4","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T11:03:08.969Z","updated_at":"2026-08-24T16:29:41.518Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v36","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v36","description":"Provenance v36 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exact v36 candidate 1a8ba68a8312943b8918ef9029023aa97fc968fd2d9c0f316d7385232e0d7712, prefreeze/postfreeze and ledger line168. Recompute candidate/product/wheels/tool hashes, receipt-v2 runner/interpreter/source/wheel/manifest/stdout/stderr, socket transcripts/race fields, direct_url raw/canonical, Ty3.12, authority chain, inventories/seals/test logs. Fresh rerun profile qualification, standalone, Ty, bare bootstrap, rehydration. Resolve all line168 digests. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE. Read-only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only release-provenance verdict - I recomputed all bindings, resolved ledger line 168, and independently reran every requested qualification surface.\n\n# Cryptographic verdict: PASS\n\nExact candidate:\n\n`1a8ba68a8312943b8918ef9029023aa97fc968fd2d9c0f316d7385232e0d7712`\n\n## Core provenance\n\n- Candidate derivation recomputed from canonical inputs: exact match.\n- Candidate file: `cad42b6d5c56719a082a14f98dd0b7baa0b63cc6d9e930bd3e99df7b81e90fd0`\n- Product binding:\n  - document: `74a3e39740ac76a67b3402d4046b716bca5ef926e704b7cbc7c74bac6f1646b3`\n  - file: `d9c983b5e26f7e21b1e2e6507aacb1146a6fdfb747185a7adc71a37618b6df56`\n- Wheels:\n  - Hermes: `cf768529760f99f1023509b2309777e24cc837f56c3ebd2086e91a9721ee5884`\n  - Profile: `a56da2417df0912f3fe407c0b78befd7362207d1c8a35271000af46701ba79d2`\n  - Ty: `932d4552233cfbaa325ddc3db5982150a37f437cf94a332eb3869052148bfe4c`\n- All 109 sealed wheels passed full ZIP/RECORD member hash and size validation.\n- Bound tool hashes, including Ty runner `cf6cdcf...`, profile runner `ef7c3ce7...`, and interpreter `d9bc96d1...`, match.\n\n## Receipt-v2 and fresh profile run\n\nHistorical receipt-v2 recomputed correctly:\n\n- Receipt file: `11b5e964e2688c3cf444c92f51890d2c52c71f6353a01f1f8e3ed80ed8466e90`\n- Receipt document: `b1a732e065a4ef0b3768ed5c9387d5cd2593da61b1bfeb96f5e62c48d24a3df3`\n- Source before/after: `b34b2a12fd0ad3d4c95a58c847a2411e81272a646f5a4f5ec568d0d3640a3747`\n- Manifest artifact: `e9d99366b71c1da76cab1b0232478ba262b94deb4eb48301ff41f06704864bf8`\n- Manifest document: `75570c292c602ee16f25d6fbafada471b70b3cddf9d3f7d7fee75bd0e6227a0b`\n- Historical stdout: `f71b02075ec56c94c14e7d8c8d31dede6043090f59eb3a16d3514902e56725ed`\n- Historical stderr: empty SHA-256.\n- Fresh isolated run: `749/749/749`, exit 0, Python 3.12.9, pytest 9.1.1.\n- Fresh ordered test IDs reproduced the exact manifest document digest. Raw stdout differed only because pytest embeds elapsed time.\n\n## Ty, socket, and direct_url\n\n- Fresh valid Ty run reproduced:\n  - 810 diagnostics\n  - raw: `f4a2265141525dc8005430e8afdf61145ff88c24a7fc00aad2d7609b3f2ce86a`\n  - semantic: `4b24118c95c05fa392f976a69034da7e7d24f63d098b32ef5c252537ab13da61`\n  - target `--python-version 3.12` exactly once\n  - zero capability diagnostics\n- Both socket transcripts canonically recomputed:\n  - source: `1ee8a05698b941267af090d620e5b4f3f9608c75bdaa33818e3adabf78dbb944`\n  - installed: `eceed398429f5d9743c4dcd818cb32fa482e0c5823eb7f8a5ce78b3efb959668`\n- Each records one server-delivered post-revocation update, zero handler entries, zero mutations, deferred watcher failure, and complete cleanup.\n- Ledger hashes `d8bfc6...` and `80d4e0...` are raw transcript-file hashes; the different values above are canonical document hashes.\n- Raw direct_url hashes recomputed:\n  - Hermes: `da1a23b65038c9e1bd16e63e5ded0f218f9434bd451b7546fa4e11dee1dd8bcc`\n  - Profile: `e2bf6d6efd045965e1fcf35db5738f6b98f691b82f61d153c5df0f0987e8ad48`\n- Canonical portable projections:\n  - Hermes: `f28a844f3dd45d39a7b3b7f9455857f071cd64c283077b3b157b32576c5a4f71`\n  - Profile: `17792abcaaa6a8c08704ef383c2a9ae685e9cc7795a9b0071671af15d0ea42f2`\n- No raw path-dependent equality is claimed.\n\n## Authority, seals, inventories, and reruns\n\n- Full 39-event authority registry and ledger chains recomputed.\n- Registry head: `77db12c10f93a65c54c1cd1383a0f7a1d1a6bac889c9d6d063f3d987abc1ceea`\n- Ledger head: `1ef33da8d556f185ffd941deeaf562321c2091ac8b2498e78df85373178f51f9`\n- Prefreeze: 394 files, exact inventory, modes and no symlinks.\n- Prefreeze seal: `ca3a427889c8d5f61929b34707c2a89529c9205e00e06c3733307df414fc96b0`\n- Postfreeze: 43 sealed receipt files, exact stream byte counts/hashes and exit codes.\n- Postfreeze seal: `2ccf4da39293b7c101c1a69c3e4955eebbf5ee2a55688b46f636620ada8988c4`\n- Fresh hostile-CWD standalone: `TASK26_INDEPENDENT_CANDIDATE_PASS`\n- Fresh bare bootstrap: `TASK26_FROZEN_BOOTSTRAP_PASS`\n- Fresh clean 109-wheel rehydration: `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`\n- Test logs resolve to 284 focused, 76 expanded, 204+204 parser, 131 lifecycle, 8,530 Gateway, 32 direct_url attacks, and 14 Ty attacks.\n\nAll 22 digest fields in ledger line 168 resolve exactly to their referenced bytes. The evidence bundles and ledger were not modified; audit-only temporary roots were removed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":523977,"turns":26,"tool_calls":54,"output_tokens":19788,"total_tokens":5030548,"generation_ms":411710,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":4.7693,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9944464689162598,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9432245807023286}}