{"task_id":"st_01a019f4","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T12:12:41.259Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T14:59:55.010Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"final-f5-cleanup","task_summary":"Verify final cleanup and release provenance","description":"F5 cleanup verification","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final Verification F5 for exact delivered v38 candidate. Confirm disabled/nonconsenting customer, delivery disabled, truthful inactive runtime, no orphan/trainer/process/fd/socket/watcher/pending/unknown/writable/symlink artifacts, exact candidate/delivered/postfreeze seals, migrated/archive receipts, all six reviewer PASS receipt, Task27 bounded-pilot report, ledger/plan/handoff/todo consistency. Return PASS/FAIL with exact evidence and residual risk. Read-only/offline.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"I read this as the strict F5 release gate - the exact v38 candidate verifies, but live cleanup and control-plane consistency failures make the result FAIL.\n\n# F5 verdict: FAIL\n\n## Release-blocking findings\n\n1. **Customer is not nonconsenting**\n   - Disabled: `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/customers/registry.json:14` → `\"enabled\": false`\n   - But consent remains granted: lines `43-46` → `\"granted\": true`\n   - This contradicts Task27 report line `143`: “disabled and nonconsenting.”\n\n2. **Live rehearsal residue remains**\n   - Bootstrap ledger contains an expired, nonterminal session:\n     - `state: \"AWAITING_ACTIVATION\"`\n     - role claim for customer `8527916639`\n     - session `cb_mYUoMIsk_CRzSDKYpPE9dg`\n     - expired `2026-08-18T15:25:08Z`\n   - Location: `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-customer-bootstrap-v1/ledger.json:1`\n   - Customer state and transient workflow also remain under:\n     - `data/customers/task26_claim_20260818145508_1b96b23d/`\n   - Four old strict runtimes remain, approximately 1.1 GB total:\n     - `062fb6b69adb84b0-v7`\n     - `c6ec9cec605d3605`\n     - `dac4e812`\n     - `f32a8365-v8`\n   - Each contains symlinks and thousands of writable paths. This contradicts Task27 lines `148-151`, which claim all Task26 runtimes and residue were removed.\n\n3. **Handoff is internally contradictory**\n   - Handoff lines `16-23` record exact-candidate six-lane PASS.\n   - Lines `30-36` record the Task27 bounded-pilot verdict.\n   - Lines `40-41` nevertheless state: “Task26 review receipts currently contain release-blocking findings.”\n   - Ledger lines `170-171` instead record Task26 PASS and Task27 completion.\n\n4. **Final todo state is incomplete**\n   - Plan has `27/32` checked.\n   - F1-F5 remain unchecked at lines `1188-1201`.\n   - Therefore the plan’s own completion rule at lines `1205-1217` still resolves to NO-GO.\n\n## Checks that passed\n\n- Delivery controls: `activation=false`, `delivery=false`, `delivery_enabled=false` at config lines `660-664`.\n- Runtime service: `hermes-gateway-dualcoachtest.service` is `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`.\n- No exact-v38 process, open FD, socket, watcher, or external temporary runtime path was found.\n- No live, non-archive trainer path was found; trainer-named material exists only inside retained historical archives.\n- Candidate: `d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`.\n- Exact seals:\n  - Prefreeze: `257498e6...24b037b9`\n  - Postfreeze: `3002d815...6b5878f6`\n  - Delivered: `54be54cf...3a752f67`\n  - Receipt: `52b7de2d...cab745c8`\n- Manifest verification:\n  - Delivered inventory: `482/482`, zero mismatches\n  - Postfreeze inventory: `481/481`, zero mismatches\n  - Receipt seal: `27/27`, zero mismatches\n  - Retained postfreeze copies are byte-identical.\n- All three sealed roots are mode `0500`, with zero writable entries and zero symlinks.\n- Fresh-lineage/archive replacement for the superseded migrated-session receipt is documented at plan lines `59-62`.\n- Source and installed archive terminal receipts each report `active=0`, `pending=0`, `unknown=0`, `orphan=0`, terminal `committed`.\n- Six-lane receipt SHA-256 `b063e92d...c15ddf6` records all six PASS.\n- Task27 report SHA-256 `45c28455...c5d2848` exists and is candidate-bound, but its cleanup assertions are not truthful against current live state.\n\n## Residual risk\n\nEven after correcting the blocking cleanup state, integrity remains host-permission sealed rather than externally signed/WORM, and 809 out-of-scope Ty diagnostics remain. The present blocking risks are stronger: retained consent, an expired nonterminal bootstrap authority/session, old writable runtimes, and contradictory release-control documentation.\n\nAudit was read-only and offline; no files, services, or profile state were changed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":186559,"turns":7,"tool_calls":26,"output_tokens":9238,"total_tokens":806810,"generation_ms":173649,"tokens_per_second":53,"cost_usd":1.447208,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9743708314806581,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7851027869584188}}