{"task_id":"st_01a01a0e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T12:43:57.922Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T14:59:54.600Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task27-f3-reliability-final","task_summary":"Verify final reliability and exactly-once behavior","description":"F3 reliability and exactly-once verifier","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"FINAL VERIFICATION LANE F3 — RELIABILITY AND EXACTLY-ONCE. Read-only review and execution only; do not mutate source/profile/evidence, start services, contact external systems, activate/deliver, commit, or push. Candidate `d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`; delivered root `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-combined-v38-delivered-st_01a019d7`; Task26 six-lane receipt and Task27 cleanup receipt are authoritative inputs but must be independently checked. Verify owner/operator review restart, stale/duplicate/wrong-actor/expired capability handling, unknown provider outcome no-retry, exactly one transport and one audited receipt, atomic claim before provider I/O, revocation ordering, background/scheduled authority leases, cleanup resume/rollback, and one-use cleanup refusal. Execute relevant sealed/offline tests and direct delivered-root verifiers under the candidate-bound interpreter where specified. Return decisive `PASS`/`FAIL`, confidence, commands with exact outcomes, evidence paths/hashes, scenario matrix, and blockers. Stop only after every F3 requirement is adjudicated.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"I read this as the completed F3 reliability verdict - I independently verified the sealed candidate, exercised the relevant offline scenarios, and adjudicated all requirements.\n\n# F3 VERDICT: PASS\n\n**Confidence: High (0.96)**  \n**Candidate:** `d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`  \n**Blockers:** None.\n\n## Scenario matrix\n\n| Requirement | Result | Verification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Owner/operator review survives restart | PASS | Both restart observability tests passed; committed approval was recovered without second review and original owner update produced one terminal receipt. |\n| Stale capability/reference | PASS | Stale generation return, stale schedule reference, owner-version drift, and stale callbacks rejected. |\n| Duplicate capability/callback | PASS | One-use capability and duplicate callback tests rejected replay without provider I/O. |\n| Wrong actor/authority | PASS | Wrong user, wrong owner, wrong review authority, and owner-change cases rejected. |\n| Expired capability/lease | PASS | Expired operator callback performed refresh only; expired worker/publication leases recovered exactly once. |\n| Unknown provider outcome, no retry | PASS | Unknown outcome remained terminal across restart and reconciliation; transport count stayed unchanged. |\n| Exactly one transport | PASS | Source and installed bundles each contain exactly one raw customer transport call. Concurrent reservation/atomic-claim tests passed. |\n| Exactly one audited receipt | PASS | Source and installed bundles each contain exactly one `telegram-customer-surface-receipt-v2`, bound to the one provider message and delivery claim. |\n| Atomic claim before provider I/O | PASS | Delivered code durably changes `pending -> unknown_provider_outcome` and capability `issued -> consumed` under the delivery lock before returning a dispatch claim. Atomic single-winner test passed. |\n| Revocation ordering | PASS | Revocation waits for an active handler lease; revocation-first admits zero mutation/provider sends; cancellation releases leases. |\n| Background/scheduled authority leases | PASS | Update/background cancellation and error paths release leases; schedule confirmation is one-use and rejects invalid authority. |\n| Cleanup resume | PASS | Crash-after-each-phase forward-only resume tests passed. |\n| Cleanup rollback | PASS | Task27 injected faults at `canonical_copied_verified` and `after_bootstrap_prune` restored the sealed baseline. |\n| One-use cleanup refusal | PASS | Reexecution returned exit 2 with unchanged mutation state. |\n| Terminal cleanup authority | PASS | Active, pending, unknown, and orphan counts are all zero; disabled, nonconsenting, archive-verified, journal-committed terminal state. |\n\n## Executed verification\n\nCandidate-bound interpreter:\n\n- `/home/cube/miniconda3/bin/python3`\n- Python `3.12.9`\n- SHA-256: `d9bc96d1ad0161db7ebdc8fdbc690530a9c29299feb2001cba6b29072e2a9051`\n\nCommands and outcomes:\n\n1. `python3 -I .../verification-tools/independent_verify_candidate.py <delivered-root>`\n   - Exit `0`\n   - `TASK26_INDEPENDENT_CANDIDATE_PASS`\n   - Runtime source: `sealed_wheelhouse_only`\n   - Receipt SHA-256: `f3b347f9f8b3f2d82188afb4c146ab3deb2845a3da3ce38c52d68c7ba5ccf9e6`\n\n2. Direct delivered inventory recomputation:\n   - `482` entries checked\n   - `0` type, mode, size, or SHA-256 mismatches.\n\n3. Delivered-wheel gateway reliability tests:\n   - Core delivery/restart batch: `12 passed`; one async node initially not executed because plugin autoload was disabled.\n   - Corrected explicit sealed `pytest_asyncio` invocation: `6 passed`.\n   - Owner restart observability: `2 passed`.\n   - Adaptive authority/exactly-once batch: `8 passed`.\n   - Total relevant gateway scenarios: `28 passed`.\n\n4. Delivered profile-wheel cleanup tests:\n   - `8 passed`, including parameterized crash-resume phases, concurrency, archive mismatch, projection tamper, and source mutation.\n\nThe intermediate async failures were harness collection failures (`pytest_asyncio` unavailable under disabled autoload), not assertion failures. Adding the sealed wheelhouse plugin explicitly produced clean passes.\n\n## Evidence and hashes\n\nDelivered root:\n\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-combined-v38-delivered-st_01a019d7`\n- Delivered seal: `54be54cf89720057486596a21941ec5d456a1c54148f66dbde0475503a752f67`\n- Postfreeze seal: `3002d815d7523c2971c990544d92c1f0d16fd51781f83d9d636ef6336b5878f6`\n- Hermes wheel: `f8b3c779c58435dd33f8f9bbc89e9823bd09f81367a27366c6d678270c1860b1`\n- Profile wheel: `a56da2417df0912f3fe407c0b78befd7362207d1c8a35271000af46701ba79d2`\n\nReliability evidence:\n\n- `05-unknown_delivery_no_retry.json`: `c0026a7fa6919ea7c510f2252f25f94353500b413d458cec6ea3b170b97b854b`\n- `06-successful_lifecycle.json`: `fcbf953f711f014913feee8e3a65083b88be93c1089e9c2ed815b60c102180cc`\n- `07-cleanup_resume_terminal.json`: `0ef99d5b9fc213371ee944a8ff3ce7944b4cf25247c089d8b76ce1dc6770bf44`\n- Six-lane receipt: `b063e92d5c8e60de3067794edd68412c676ebbaf2b0f942793d6ee41dc15ddf6`\n\nTask27:\n\n- Cleanup receipt: `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-live-cleanup-receipt.json`\n  - SHA-256: `7848def41100aa4f4ef27239dfaae3cc634d5ad2b24df7966d4d80838f692a3a`\n- Verification receipt: `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-verification-receipt.json`\n  - SHA-256: `08264241a690d0189726132437712232ebe551b6f51392718bf82a290b8f7569`\n- Current controller and receipt-bound controller:\n  - `8aee38ea920cbaa2b18d7ebe0104aa1baeabcaeb49152f25819ee1380ebbc443`\n- Recomputed live permission payload:\n  - `b7d9dd391735913915627e94a759095b9ae10aeb5086ac458e6af422327c7f94`\n  - Exactly matches the cleanup receipt.\n\n## Non-blocking evidence defect\n\n`.omo/evidence/task27/receipt-hashes.sha256` predates the live-authorized controller revision:\n\n- It expects controller hash `d57c8564...`\n- Current and cleanup-receipt-bound controller hash is `8aee38ea...`\n- It also omits later live authorization/cleanup files.\n\nThis auxiliary manifest is stale, but it does not invalidate F3: the authoritative cleanup receipt binds the current controller, candidate, permission payload, delivered seals, exact profile, and terminal checks, all independently recomputed successfully.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":336125,"turns":16,"tool_calls":61,"output_tokens":14427,"total_tokens":2400668,"generation_ms":298170,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":2.611183,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9915209881712551,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.908246903812314}}