{"task_id":"st_01a01a10","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T12:43:57.958Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T14:08:24.823Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task27-f5-cleanup-final","task_summary":"Verify final cleanup and release provenance","description":"F5 cleanup and provenance verifier","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"FINAL VERIFICATION LANE F5 — CLEANUP AND RELEASE PROVENANCE. Work read-only; never mutate profile/source/evidence, start services, contact Telegram/providers, activate/deliver, commit, or push. This is a fresh rerun after approved canonical cleanup. Candidate `d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`; delivered root `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-combined-v38-delivered-st_01a019d7`; permission seal `b7d9dd391735913915627e94a759095b9ae10aeb5086ac458e6af422327c7f94`; cleanup receipt `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-live-cleanup-receipt.json` SHA256 `7848def41100aa4f4ef27239dfaae3cc634d5ad2b24df7966d4d80838f692a3a`. Independently confirm disabled customer, consent=false, absent live customer workflow and bootstrap authority, byte-recoverable immutable archives, committed journals, zero active/pending/unknown/orphan authority, delivery off, gateway inactive/dead MainPID 0, no matching processes/jobs/sockets/watchers, other profiles byte-identical to sealed preflight, exact candidate/wheel/source/provenance identities, clean delivered/receipt roots, migrated-session and historical cleanup receipts, all Task26 reviewers PASS on one candidate, and no trainer artifacts. Re-run direct delivered-root verifier/frozen bootstrap and relevant final-state/profile cleanup validators using the candidate-bound interpreter where required. Reject any stale, circular, mutable, or cross-candidate evidence. Return decisive `PASS`/`FAIL`, confidence, exact commands/results, evidence paths/hashes, residual findings, and blockers. Stop only after every F5 clause is adjudicated.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"I read this as an independent, read-only F5 release-provenance audit - I verified the canonical cleanup state and sealed candidate directly, excluding stale evidence.\n\n# F5 verdict: PASS\n\n**Confidence: 0.97**\n\nEvery F5 clause is satisfied for candidate:\n\n`d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`\n\n## Direct verification\n\nCandidate-bound interpreter:\n\n- Python `3.12.9`\n- Executable SHA256: `d9bc96d1ad0161db7ebdc8fdbc690530a9c29299feb2001cba6b29072e2a9051`\n\nCommands:\n\n```bash\n$PY -I \"$DELIVERED/verification-tools/independent_verify_candidate.py\" \"$DELIVERED\"\n```\n\nResult: exit `0`, `TASK26_INDEPENDENT_CANDIDATE_PASS`\n\n```bash\n$PY -I \"$DELIVERED/verification-tools/task26_frozen_bootstrap.py\" \"$DELIVERED\"\n```\n\nResult: exit `0`, `TASK26_FROZEN_BOOTSTRAP_PASS`; nested `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`.\n\nThe verifier confirmed:\n\n- Candidate: `d1109d8f...39112`\n- Expected state: `9c6e574bb2f6f9532c6edbef80119a5ab3182889c744a5a1dd6c7c0aa967385d`\n- Hermes wheel: `f8b3c779c58435dd33f8f9bbc89e9823bd09f81367a27366c6d678270c1860b1`\n- Profile wheel: `a56da2417df0912f3fe407c0b78befd7362207d1c8a35271000af46701ba79d2`\n- Ty wheel: `932d4552233cfbaa325ddc3db5982150a37f437cf94a332eb3869052148bfe4c`\n- Product binding: `72fa416b447c48327993ab03482892572104887acef4b64eac98285d2d4e0e48`\n- Prefreeze seal: `257498e6aa2db7107ee24223a29b09f2e26c3d493869dc21206688be24b037b9`\n- Postfreeze seal: `3002d815d7523c2971c990544d92c1f0d16fd51781f83d9d636ef6336b5878f6`\n- Delivered seal: `54be54cf89720057486596a21941ec5d456a1c54148f66dbde0475503a752f67`\n- Receipt seal: `52b7de2d30d99f38db6f73ad70ebe9a21c99449348f069cf3d1f29f5cab745c8`\n\n## Live cleanup state\n\nUsing the candidate-bound interpreter and the cleanup controller’s read-only inventory functions:\n\n- Customer disabled: `true`\n- AI consent granted: `false`\n- Customer workflow directory: absent\n- Bootstrap authority directory: absent\n- Delivery off: `true`\n- Active/pending/unknown/orphan authority: `0/0/0/0`\n- Every authority category: `0`\n- Archive verified: `true`\n- Journal committed: `true`\n- Terminal: `true`\n\nGateway:\n\n```text\nLoadState=loaded\nActiveState=inactive\nSubState=dead\nMainPID=0\n```\n\nExact `/proc`, FD and watcher scan:\n\n```json\n{\"matching_fds\":[],\"matching_processes\":[],\"matching_watchers\":[]}\n```\n\nNo matching timers, cron/at jobs, or listening sockets were found.\n\n## Archive and journal integrity\n\nCleanup receipt:\n\n- Path: `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-live-cleanup-receipt.json`\n- SHA256: `7848def41100aa4f4ef27239dfaae3cc634d5ad2b24df7966d4d80838f692a3a`\n- Permission seal: `b7d9dd391735913915627e94a759095b9ae10aeb5086ac458e6af422327c7f94`\n- Operation: `e90fcc341e9f49c2a2c57ce46dd50c12`\n- Status: `COMMITTED`\n\nCanonical customer archive:\n\n- Manifest: `816a59cca0bf2f652270673af6842e5d4ad9b6a41f93810d682f374c12bc2704`\n- Journal: `53a9bdbbadd49fab009c940e3ee512bf0f43d520491e7904613b5dbfb63a997e`\n- All three archived files matched manifest size and SHA256.\n- Journal chain valid: `prepared -> copied_verified -> source_pruned -> committed`.\n\nBootstrap archive:\n\n- Manifest: `e4f5b5c9d376ad11bbcd9248f7293c5e8866189f0a7a055ba3c260781296049f`\n- Journal: `9b431b6e4ccb5aa53267bc2a894b15c4c00574cdd9bcc5efb901bcc7ed24d23a`\n- Source/archive digest equality:\n  `e6d0a5b61178d8870878b6f275841f7da6d18353add8cd64282594a2ebb192f0`\n- Journal chain valid through `committed`.\n- Both archive trees: zero symlinks, zero writable entries; directories `0500`, files `0400`.\n\nThe migrated claim session is preserved in the immutable archive and bound to session `cb_mYUoMIsk_CRzSDKYpPE9dg`. Historical cleanup receipts were present and coherent:\n\n- Post-lifecycle cleanup: `PASS`\n- Profile reset: `PASS`, bootstrap covered, other profiles unchanged\n- Task25 rehearsal archive: 23 scopes, digest `644d74b05bc8115f9e3aeeba035188da195a7de18f1bc737648931d64bf43bcf`\n\n## Profile and evidence isolation\n\nOther-profile snapshot exactly matches sealed preflight:\n\n- Aggregate: `9096c74dac8583eb8186f37fcb15ac06ff13795269979af808dd0855d85b51b6`\n- Quarantine profile: `eddf21f8b17b85a0002b1cb9bbdc7881dc1190efae0ed17a2e53d6b9a7bf7bcb`\n- Physique Coach: `0b593d81c6a7b0e9ab18e3c0842e06188776c1f2a1bc6e4e08a920771800a899`\n\nDelivered, prefreeze, and postfreeze-receipt roots each have:\n\n- Root mode `0500`\n- Zero writable paths\n- Zero symlinks\n\nNo verifier-created temporary runtime remained.\n\n## Reviews and trainer-free state\n\n`.omo/evidence/task26/task26-v38-final-six-lane-review.json`\n\n- SHA256: `b063e92d5c8e60de3067794edd68412c676ebbaf2b0f942793d6ee41dc15ddf6`\n- Six reviewers: all `PASS`\n- One candidate and one delivered root throughout\n- `all_lanes_pass=true`\n- `task26_complete=true`\n\nDelivered runtime scan found:\n\n- Trainer-named artifacts: `0`\n- Python/JSON/YAML runtime files containing `trainer`: `0`\n\n## Residual findings\n\n- `.omo/evidence/task27/receipt-hashes.sha256` is a **stale pre-authorization rehearsal manifest**: it expects controller hash `d57c...aa29`, while the authorized cleanup used controller `8aee...443`. It also predates and omits the authorized dry-run and cleanup receipt. I rejected this manifest and did not use it as proof. The current controller hash independently matches the committed cleanup receipt and ledger line 174.\n- The earlier `NO_GO_PENDING_LIVE_CLEANUP` suspension receipt remains as historical evidence. Cleanup remediation is complete, but release-verdict reissuance remains gated on the parent’s complete fresh F1-F5 wave.\n- Unrelated host Telegram services and old historical Task26 scratch artifacts exist, but exact candidate/profile process, FD, socket, watcher and scheduled-job scans are zero.\n\n**Blockers: none for F5.** No source, profile, or evidence files were modified; no service, Telegram/provider, delivery, activation, commit, or push action occurred.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":283074,"turns":11,"tool_calls":42,"output_tokens":13505,"total_tokens":1385877,"generation_ms":262821,"tokens_per_second":51,"cost_usd":1.9286420000000002,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9958415288271358,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8644186853127286}}