{"task_id":"st_01a01d52","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":false,"created_at":"2026-08-20T03:59:07.552Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T13:40:10.457Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"task27-supplemental-live-preflight","task_summary":"Audit sealed live cleanup before mutation","description":"Review exact supplemental live cleanup seal","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"READ-ONLY FINAL PREFLIGHT. Review the exact Task27 supplemental live cleanup before any live mutation. Scope: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task27/task27_supplemental_cleanup_controller.py` SHA256 `3ac9da0f9c1fb23055fa58bfc9b720a45515472c710067b91e4712affa2caf7c`; tests SHA256 `e1a8e8c40b7c554a365fef4294109262544b51aff3605c07bb5c98b572801d55` with 21 PASS; authorization `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-supplemental-live-cleanup-authorization.json` SHA256 `5807eb0b192a979e922344a37b50f29d58bf41739c66eb2bed76aed31eb54bef`; authorized dry-run `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-supplemental-live-authorized-dry-run.json` SHA256 `c55ef3919d5ce97b2f39b0bba83cc2f11b2828abaa9494fa2c19e69ef874e045`, final permission seal `5c5874f451e7272d1fd1b69cf0b85909cf463219dd67da8619227ba3f919cd9b`; prior disposable verification/nonmutation receipts. Inspect live profile read-only and service state. Determine GO/NO-GO for exactly one invocation archiving/pruning only the two authorized operational directories into the supplemental archive, with no service/Telegram/provider/activation/release action. Check authorization binding, state drift, rollback, foreign-state refusal, archive immutability, one-use, receipt output, and whether the controller could mutate anything outside disclosed paths. Do not edit files/profile/service or invoke external actions. Return a concise verdict and exact blockers if any.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only release gate - all prior blockers and regression checks now pass.\n\n## Verdict: GO\n\nExact evidence:\n\n- Controller SHA: `65fc6c93e4ba7b0efaff84563f50d37875d150551a00260e7f3ade7b9d009e9f`\n- Tests SHA: `3833be95b478bcce4e96c6f7b95c07930d86e8b3f804fd7a5fffc324416fa3c1`\n- Preview SHA: `670c9d07198942503a9da892d4dc723312ec60ccab538c8552f78a1b22660287`\n- Preview seal recomputes exactly to `7d7b9d5b1da8c655bfae188841ffdf0da62818be952e43cfe1f8b5781cd61889`.\n\nPrior blockers resolved:\n\n- Post-authorization dry-run requires the READY payload, after replacing only `live_authorization` with `null`, to equal the complete approved preview payload.\n- `execute()` independently repeats that exact projection check, rejecting recomputed forged seals.\n- Authorization pins the current controller, preview hash, preview seal, and fixed paths.\n- Atomic receipt temporary is disclosed as `.omo/evidence/task27/.task27-supplemental-live-cleanup-receipt.json.*`.\n- Receipt output is fixed; arbitrary output is refused.\n- Authority lock pre-exists as owner-only `0600`, single-link inode and is neither created nor chmodded.\n- Lock acquisition precedes drift validation, backup, and mutation.\n- Drift refusal occurs before rollback setup; rollback only runs after `mutation_started`.\n- Deterministic operation ID, serialized lock, frozen consumption record, absent-source/archive checks, and fixed receipt provide one-success/concurrency enforcement.\n\nLive state has not drifted:\n\n- Outbox digest `29f118ab...`, 8 entries.\n- Membership digest `ff57a22a...`, 3 entries.\n- Supplemental archive absent with digest `4f53cda1...`.\n- 26 authenticated, target-only committed records; emergency/callback queues empty.\n- One verified target membership row.\n- Service `inactive/dead`, PID `0`, matching processes `0`.\n- Final authorization and terminal receipt remain absent, as expected before authorization.\n\nNo files, profile state, or service state were modified.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":72643,"turns":4,"tool_calls":9,"output_tokens":3177,"total_tokens":322156,"generation_ms":69537,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":0.646493,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9818006423302706,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7271199671451726}}