{"task_id":"st_01a01fc9","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-20T15:26:57.822Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T07:10:06.653Z","notification":{"run_epoch":3,"notified_epoch":3},"name":"st_01a01fc9","task_summary":"독립적으로 24시간 1회용 링크 발급 경로 검증","description":"Audit first-customer invite route","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: determine the exact safe command path to generate the first real-customer 24-hour single-use Telegram onboarding invite for profile `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest`, without performing any mutation. Scope: inspect prior Task26 invite harnesses, current v1.1 source/artifacts, profile registry and onboarding state, and CLI help. Must do: (1) identify the canonical current invite issuance command/tool, (2) prove TTL=24h and single-use semantics, (3) identify whether Gateway must be running before issuance, (4) explain how to verify the token state without consuming it, (5) identify external writes/provider calls and the exact point they occur, (6) return a minimal command sequence with evidence paths. Forbidden: do not create/revoke invites, start services, contact Telegram/providers, edit files, or expose existing secrets/tokens. Stop when a decision-complete read-only invite runbook is returned.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"I read this as the final r2 go/no-go audit - both the corrected installation and subsequent exactly-one invite sequence are **PASS**.\n\n## Verdict\n\n- **Corrected r2 installation: PASS**\n- **Later exactly-one invite issuance: PASS**\n- **Issuance before r2 install/provider receipts: correctly blocked**\n\n## Attempt-1 containment\n\n- Service remains inactive/dead with PID 0.\n- Baseline unit is restored exactly: SHA-256 `e21f9905...`.\n- Failed runtime, snapshot, and receipt remain preserved.\n- Final authorization explicitly marks attempt 1 superseded and records:\n  - provenance failure,\n  - failed runtime path,\n  - failed receipt hash,\n  - `service_started: false`,\n  - `unit_restored_to_baseline: true`.\n- r2 uses distinct runtime, snapshot, unit, install/provider/start receipts, and authorization. The old install receipt cannot satisfy r2 downstream gates.\n\n## r2 installation evidence\n\n- Final authorization SHA matches `d8c0d010...`.\n- r2 preflight SHA matches `dda1939e...`.\n- r2 runtime and snapshot paths are absent.\n- All r2 output paths are unused.\n- Wheelhouse remains exactly 107 wheels with authorized digest `554176ae...`.\n- Pinned `uv` hash matches.\n- Installation uses:\n  - `--no-index`\n  - `--no-deps`\n  - `--no-compile`\n  - `UV_LINK_MODE=copy`\n- Controller chmods the venv root to `0700`.\n- Before switching the unit, it recursively checks every regular file under installed `site-packages` and rejects any `st_nlink != 1`.\n- The install receipt records:\n  - exact candidate/module,\n  - 86,400-second TTL,\n  - `venv_mode: \"0700\"`,\n  - `link_mode: \"copy\"`,\n  - installed-file count,\n  - exact r2 unit hash.\n- Provider/start permission gates reject receipts missing the new mode/link provenance.\n- The expected r2 unit points only to the r2 runtime.\n\n## Later invite sequencing\n\nThe safe order remains:\n\n1. r2 `install`\n2. r2 `provider-check`\n3. Invite `preflight` while Gateway is stopped\n4. Invite `prepare` exactly once\n5. r2 `start`\n6. Invite read-only `verify`\n\nThe invite permission is bound to the r2 Python, unit, install/provider/start receipts, and updated authorization. Current onboarding roots are absent and `data/customers` is empty. Existing one-use, private-handoff, exact-PREPARED, 24-hour, and non-consuming verification protections remain intact.\n\nNo mutation or external call was performed during this audit.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":96715,"turns":4,"tool_calls":14,"output_tokens":4148,"total_tokens":1243568,"generation_ms":93869,"tokens_per_second":44,"cost_usd":4.318716,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9903319146808657,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7406819318713592}}