{"task_id":"st_01a02501","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","notify_on_terminal":false,"created_at":"2026-08-21T15:45:00.363Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T06:52:24.816Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"v111-e2e-map","task_summary":"Classify 59 failures and E2E harness seams","description":"test and E2E map","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Analyze the relevant tests and Golden tools in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1 to design a disposable consent-to-first-checkin E2E and classify the prior 59 failures without editing files. DELIVERABLE: failure clusters with representative tests/root hypotheses, reusable fixtures/fake Telegram transport, exact new E2E driver boundary, real-surface CLI scenario, and verification command order. SCOPE: tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py, test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py, test_telegram_physique_checkin.py, v1.1 Golden tooling. Do not touch production or run external Telegram. VERIFY: cite file:line symbols/tests and identify whether each cluster is regression, stale expectation, fixture, dependency, or production-path gap. STOP WHEN: a decision-complete test/E2E plan is ready. Report WORKING before long analysis.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":4111719,"final_response":"<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py - main nutrition lifecycle/routing/transport contract suite; fixtures at lines 48-183 and key E2E-ish cases from 203 onward\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/tests/gateway/test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py - invite TTL and single-use bootstrap boundary tests\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin.py - physique bridge/review contracts; hermetic fake service/telegram mock at lines 23-97 and topic-59 review cases at 2374+\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/dualcoach/releases/v1.1.0/source-golden-bundle/verification-tools/source_golden_path.py - canonical disposable consent-to-first-checkin driver and FakeTelegram transport\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/dualcoach/releases/v1.1.0/source-golden-bundle/verification-tools/task26_local_telegram_qa.py - real-socket loopback Telegram QA harness for the final transport boundary\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/dualcoach/releases/v1.1.0/source-golden-bundle/verification-tools/verify_source_golden_path.py - evidence/transcript verifier and contract gate for the golden path\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/scripts/replay_dualcoach_v11_installed_golden.sh - real-surface CLI replay order for installed golden verification\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent-dualcoach-v1.1/scripts/verify_dualcoach_v11_candidate.py - release-level verifier that checks both source and installed golden paths\n</files>\n\n<answer>\nI couldn’t inspect an actual 59-failure log in-repo, so this is the failure taxonomy implied by the targeted tests/goldens:\n\n- Bootstrap/TTL boundary: `/tests/gateway/test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:30-60` is a regression check on 24h expiry + single-use claim.\n- Nutrition startup/live-reload gates: `/tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py:203-243` are a production-path gap if committed receipts aren’t honored; `:48-183` are the reusable registry/profile fixtures.\n- Routing/callback exactness and draft lifecycle: `/tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py:266-1572` are mostly production-path gaps when routing, reserve/retry, or revalidation is wrong; some copy/opaque-callback assertions are stale-expectation sensitive.\n- Schedule-confirm / review / topic-59 flows: `/tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py:1616-2268` and `/tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin.py:2374-2472` are production-path gaps if authority binding or dedup breaks; fixture issues only if the fake service contract drifts.\n- Physique bridge/prompt grammar: `/tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin.py:23-97, 2127+` are hermetic fixture-backed tests; failures there usually mean the fake service/mock transport no longer matches the real bridge contract.\n\nReusable fakes/fixtures:\n- `test_nutrition_coaching.py:_registry`, `_profile_registry`, `_nutrition_adapter`\n- `test_telegram_physique_checkin.py:_ensure_telegram_mock`, `_FakeService`, `_bridge`, `_callback`\n- `source_golden_path.py:162-171` `FakeTelegram` captures outbound onboarding publications\n- `task26_local_telegram_qa.py:43-316` is the disposable real-socket Telegram transport harness\n\nExact new E2E driver boundary:\n- Start at `RoomBootstrapStore.prepare_rehearsal_customer_invite` and `TelegramNutritionOnboardingRuntime.start_after_consent` in `source_golden_path.py:659-683`.\n- Keep all internal check-in logic in-process.\n- Cross the real boundary only at `TelegramAdapter.connect()` against the loopback aiohttp Telegram API from `task26_local_telegram_qa.py:43+`.\n- Do not push the boundary out to external Telegram; the disposable surface is local HTTP + real sockets only.\n\nReal-surface CLI scenario:\n- `scripts/replay_dualcoach_v11_installed_golden.sh` is the exact installed-wheel replay:\n  1) install wheels into a temp venv\n  2) run `verification-tools/source_golden_path.py`\n  3) run `verification-tools/verify_source_golden_path.py`\n- Release-level confirmation is `scripts/verify_dualcoach_v11_candidate.py BASE SUCCESSOR`, which requires both source and installed golden path receipts (`:175-227`).\n\nVerification command order:\n1. Focused gateway tests:\n   - `pytest tests/gateway/test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py`\n   - `pytest tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin.py`\n   - `pytest tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py`\n2. Golden replay:\n   - `bash scripts/replay_dualcoach_v11_installed_golden.sh`\n3. Release-input verifier:\n   - `python scripts/verify_dualcoach_v11_candidate.py dualcoach/releases/v1.0.0/delivered dualcoach/releases/v1.1.0`\n\nDecision: build the disposable consent-to-first-checkin E2E around the golden path driver and the loopback Telegram API harness; treat failures in the targeted tests as either regression (TTL/boundary math), stale expectation (copy/opaque callback shape), fixture mismatch (fake service/mock transport), dependency/environment (loopback/socket/proxy assumptions), or production-path gap (routing, revocation, audit, dedup).\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\nReady to proceed - no follow-up needed\n</next_steps>\n</results>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":243013,"turns":21,"tool_calls":77,"output_tokens":15298,"total_tokens":1077577,"generation_ms":231883,"tokens_per_second":66,"cost_usd":0.21167505,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9962517665854208,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9119110892712743}}