{"task_id":"st_01a029cd","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-22T14:08:24.526Z","updated_at":"2026-08-22T14:08:59.568Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"st_01a029cd","task_summary":"Review v1.2.0 goal, lifecycle contract, and protected invariants","description":"Review objective invariants","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Independently review NutriCoach v1.2.0 operator-notification candidate fe86d1c0666aab56da42381f6d65c2afd4cdcd1cdcce9a874bccdbc3fdb62f4b in /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl. Scope: goal/constraint correctness only. Inspect feature brief, source delta, candidate binding, changed code, tests, Golden Path evidence, and confirm provider acceptance is separated from human acknowledgment, safety-hold ack is non-mutating, same candidate restart dedupes, new candidate recovery occurs only when unacknowledged, /status is exact-owner only, feature is OFF without sealed authority, and no customer activation/coaching path was introduced. Do not edit. Return PASS or FAIL first, then file:line evidence and any blocker. Stop only when decision-complete.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4111719,"error_message":"Source changed after discovering valid repeated acknowledgements must be idempotent; candidate digest will be regenerated.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":34735,"turns":2,"tool_calls":8,"output_tokens":1025,"total_tokens":8389,"generation_ms":19965,"tokens_per_second":51,"cost_usd":0.05605,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.5953488372093023,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.3476371537208039}}