{"task_id":"st_01a029d7","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-22T14:15:52.053Z","updated_at":"2026-08-23T00:05:09.254Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"st_01a029d7","task_summary":"Review sealed 102c v1.2.0 lifecycle contract and invariants","description":"Review objective invariants","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Independently review sealed NutriCoach v1.2.0 candidate 102cbbb26baa6ad1b3876353a36d474c145bbc040db0739cc507608a7b5d4635 in /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl. Inspect feature brief, source-delta.json, candidate-binding.json, changed code, tests, golden-path-sealed evidence, and installed-provenance.json. Confirm provider acceptance differs from human acknowledgment, repeated valid acknowledgments are idempotent, hold ack is non-mutating, same-candidate restart dedupes, successor recovery occurs only while unacknowledged, /status exact-owner recovery works, feature is OFF without a sealed systemd-compatible authority receipt, and no activation/coaching path exists. Do not edit. Return PASS or FAIL first with evidence.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"I read this as the final verdict - PASS.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":45192,"turns":5,"tool_calls":11,"output_tokens":1819,"total_tokens":869758,"generation_ms":40828,"tokens_per_second":45,"cost_usd":0.535065,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9932528530305271,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.988087872534821}}