{"task_id":"st_01a02ec3","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-23T13:15:46.681Z","updated_at":"2026-08-25T05:41:22.676Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"checkin-docs-audit","task_summary":"Find original missed-checkin, persistence, and trend requirements","description":"Find original check-in requirements","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Inspect the NutriCoach/DualCoach repository and evidence documents only. Find the earliest or authoritative product/design documents that define: missed daily check-ins, reminders or catch-up behavior, persistence/database requirements, trend analysis, weekly/monthly review, and coach/operator review. Return exact file paths and line references, quote only the decisive machine/product requirements, and distinguish original intent from later evidence. Do not edit anything. Stop when every requested requirement has either a cited source or an explicit no-source finding.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabe7-62cd-7000-b761-e040602b488c/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-01-planner.md - original intent for one-reminder/non-response review, baseline vs confirmed strategy, morning check-ins, and operator review\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabef-8dbb-7000-aec7-3d99dcdecc96/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-02-revision.md - later authoritative revision resolving reminder, schedule-confirm, and projection ownership details\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabf3-13f5-7000-b302-47e280734977/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-02-architect.md - later authoritative clarification of static reminder, operator authority, and no-auto-send behavior\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/pre-first-customer-readiness-gate.md - original trend-analysis and weekly adjustment requirements\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/first-customer-nutrition-onboarding.md - original 12-week plan, weekly adjustment logic, and trainer/owner review requirements\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md - authoritative v1 lifecycle, atomic persistence, customer/staff split, check-in, and owner/operator review\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/dualcoach-golden-path-contract.md - durable-state contract for check-in atomic enqueue and explicit approval/delivery separation\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task27/task27-v38-bounded-pilot-release-verdict-final.md - later evidence of daily owner/operator review during the observation window\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/releases/dualcoach-v1.1.0/source-golden-bundle/customers/registry.json - later schedule evidence showing daily/weekly/monthly cadence (`monthly_day: 1`)\n</files>\n\n<answer>\nOriginal intent:\n- Missed check-ins / catch-up: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabe7-62cd-7000-b761-e040602b488c/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-01-planner.md:4, 34, 53, 70, 80, 111` says \"one reminder then non-response review\", \"record/return a review candidate after exactly one durable reminder fact\", and \"missing response after one durable reminder\" creates a review item.\n- Persistence/database: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md:72-74, 622, 745-755` says \"complete-write atomic persistence\", \"Durable state/outbox: sole authority\", and \"same transaction completes check-in and inserts generation job.\"\n- Trend analysis: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/pre-first-customer-readiness-gate.md:125-135, 157-167` says \"weight-trend method\" and \"Weekly changes use observed trajectory, adherence, actual intake, and activity changes.\"\n- Weekly review: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/first-customer-nutrition-onboarding.md:157-167` says \"Exactly 12 weekly rows\" and \"Weekly adjustment remains proposal-only\" with two seven-day windows and adherence thresholds.\n- Coach/operator review: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/first-customer-nutrition-onboarding.md:19-20, 63-68, 140, 256-266` plus `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md:89-90, 790-802, 829-840` cover registered trainer review, canonical owner approval, staff-only review surfaces, and operator review/approval/send separation.\n\nLater evidence:\n- Reminder/catch-up was tightened to a single static reminder and no-response review in `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabef-8dbb-7000-aec7-3d99dcdecc96/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-02-revision.md:17, 25, 47, 57` and `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.gjc/_session-019fabf3-13f5-7000-b302-47e280734977/plans/ralplan/dual-coach-model-rerun/stage-02-architect.md:15-16, 21`.\n- Daily operator review is evidenced in `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task27/task27-v38-bounded-pilot-release-verdict-final.md:166-167` (\"daily owner/operator review during the observation window\").\n- Check-in/delivery lifecycle evidence is in `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/dualcoach-golden-path-contract.md:13-15, 33-35, 93-95` and task24 evidence showing exact approval/send separation.\n\nNo-source finding:\n- I found no product/design document that explicitly defines a monthly review requirement. The only monthly evidence is schedule/config data, not a product/design requirement: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/releases/dualcoach-v1.1.0/source-golden-bundle/customers/registry.json:22-23` shows `monthly_day: 1` alongside daily/weekly cadence.\n\nMost decisive quoted requirements:\n- \"one reminder then non-response review\"\n- \"record/return a review candidate after exactly one durable reminder fact\"\n- \"complete-write atomic persistence\"\n- \"Durable state/outbox: sole authority\"\n- \"weight-trend method\"\n- \"Weekly changes use observed trajectory, adherence, actual intake, and activity changes.\"\n- \"Registered trainer review\"\n- \"Canonical owner approval\"\n- \"staff-only Telegram surfaces contain owner/operator review artifacts only\"\n\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\nReady to proceed - no follow-up needed\n</next_steps>\n</results>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":231579,"turns":20,"tool_calls":77,"output_tokens":13793,"total_tokens":2908523,"generation_ms":218983,"tokens_per_second":63,"cost_usd":0.413532,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9708370647948489,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9312371101968059}}