{"task_id":"st_01a02fb4","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-23T17:39:44.711Z","updated_at":"2026-08-25T18:17:40.612Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"v140-todo2-cleanup-decision","task_summary":"Assess whether SIGTERM evidence cleanup blocks Todo 2","description":"Review Todo 2 interruption gate","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Decision memo only: determine whether the remaining Todo 2 issue must block completion under the approved plan and start-work quality contract.\n\nRead-only inputs:\n- Plan Todo 2: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations.md`.\n- Start-work skill: `/projects/richard/omo-native-pirate/packages/omo-senpi/plugin/skills/start-work/SKILL.md`, especially applicable ultraqa repeated interruptions and cleanup.\n- Consolidation checkpoint: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/start-work/checkpoints/nutricoach-v140-todo2-consolidation.md`.\n- Target evidence root: `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v140-impl/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations/`, especially r3 runner, audit and cleanup.\n\nKnown facts:\n- Product config/authority contract, tests, manual QA, LSP, ruff, ty, compileall, LOC, normal RED reproduction and normal cleanup all pass.\n- The evidence-only RED runner owns a TemporaryDirectory. When an independent verifier blocks its pytest child and sends SIGTERM to the runner process group, runner exits 143 before Python cleanup and leaves one `.task-2-red-r3-*` directory. Reviewer removes it.\n- No product/live resource leaks or side effects.\n\nAnswer exactly:\n1. Is repeated-interruption QA applicable to this evidence runner under the start-work contract?\n2. Must the leak block Todo 2 (`REPAIR_REQUIRED`), or may it be recorded as non-product verifier cleanup (`NON_BLOCKING`)?\n3. If repair required, name the minimum evidence-only fix and acceptance; if non-blocking, cite exact contract language.\n\nDo not modify files, run live actions, or broaden scope. Return verdict, rationale, and non-negotiable safeguards.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1082531,"final_response":"1. **Yes.** The runner is part of Todo 2’s QA/evidence flow, owns generated temporary state, and is interrupted mid-operation while managing a child process. The contract explicitly maps **“mid-operation interrupts → repeated interruptions”** and states: **“A class applies when its trigger fact holds. Probe each applicable class.”** This is not limited to product code.\n\n2. **`REPAIR_REQUIRED`.** Product behavior is sound, but checkbox completion is governed by the whole start-work quality contract. The independent audit returned `needs-fix`, and the contract says: **“`confirmed` is the only pass verdict. `false-positive`, `needs-fix`, and `needs-human-review` all block checkbox completion.”** Reviewer removal restored workspace hygiene but did not turn the failed interruption behavior into a confirmed pass.\n\n3. **Minimum evidence-only repair and acceptance:**\n   - **Recommended design:** Change the runner to own its pytest child through `Popen`, convert SIGTERM into orderly cancellation, and use an idempotent `finally` path that terminates, bounded-waits, escalates if necessary, reaps the child, removes only its owned temporary parent, and exits with an interruption status rather than success.\n   - **Alternative:** Introduce an evidence-only supervisor/helper that owns signal forwarding, child reaping, and temporary-root cleanup. This is more reusable but adds coupling and another failure surface; one runner does not justify it.\n   - **Acceptance:** Reproduce the FIFO-synchronized SIGTERM case after the child-entered signal; require bounded runner exit, no surviving runner or child, and zero `.task-2-red-r3-*` directories. Then rerun normal RED twice, modified-manifest rejection, focused tests, diagnostics/static gates, and cleanup. A fresh independent verifier must return `confirmed`.\n   - **Non-negotiable safeguards:** Evidence files only; no product module or product-test behavior changes; terminate only the runner-owned child/resources; bounded escalation with child reaping; cancellation must never emit success; no live, network, provider, service, customer, or Git actions.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":116998,"turns":5,"tool_calls":11,"output_tokens":4809,"total_tokens":97116,"generation_ms":113566,"tokens_per_second":42,"cost_usd":0.345453,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.6645588577894632,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.6267780341685896}}