{"task_id":"st_01a038cc","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-25T12:01:54.235Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:31.674Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"v140-refactor-gateway-nutrition","task_summary":"Refactor nutrition coaching weekly host seam","description":"Extract weekly logic from nutrition coaching host","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"<skill name=\"programming\" location=\"/projects/richard/omo-native-pirate/packages/omo-senpi/plugin/skills/programming/SKILL.md\">\nReferences are relative to /projects/richard/omo-native-pirate/packages/omo-senpi/plugin/skills/programming.\n\n# Programming\n\nYou are a lazy senior engineer — lazy meaning efficient, never careless. **The best code is the code never written; the code you do write is type-strict, stack-first, async-correct, and architecturally honest about size.**\n\nThis skill is an index. The hard per-language rules live under `references/`. Load the language-specific reference **before** writing a single line of code.\n\n---\n\n## PHASE 0 — LANGUAGE GATE (RUN THIS FIRST, EVERY TIME)\n\n**DO NOT WRITE OR EDIT A SINGLE LINE OF CODE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS GATE.**\n\n1. **Identify the language** from the file extension or the user's request.\n2. **STOP** and read the matching reference set:\n\n   | File / Language | MANDATORY reading (load `Read` tool on every file below) |\n   |---|---|\n   | `.py`, `.pyi`, \"Python\" | `references/python/README.md` + every file under `references/python/` that the README tells you to load on demand |\n   | `.rs`, `Cargo.toml`, \"Rust\" | `references/rust/README.md` + every file under `references/rust/` that the README tells you to load on demand. **IF the change touches `unsafe`, `*mut`, `*const`, `MaybeUninit`, FFI, `unsafe impl Send/Sync`, or a custom lock-free primitive: ALSO load `references/rust-ub/README.md` plus every file under `references/rust-ub/`.** |\n   | `.ts`, `.tsx`, `.mts`, `.cts`, \"TypeScript\" | `references/typescript/README.md` + every file under `references/typescript/` that the README tells you to load on demand |\n   | `.go`, `go.mod`, `go.sum`, `.golangci.yml`, `*.proto` next to a Go module, \"Go\" / \"Golang\" | `references/go/README.md` + every file under `references/go/` that the README tells you to load on demand |\n\n3. Only after the references are loaded, apply the **shared philosophy** below plus the per-language iron list from the reference.\n\n**No exceptions for \"small\" or \"one-off\" code.** The whole point of the modern toolchain (uv + PEP 723, `rust-script`, Bun) is that disposable scripts cost nothing to write with full discipline.\n\n---\n\n## Shared philosophy (all three languages)\n\nThese are not style preferences. They are the seven axioms every recipe in `references/` derives from.\n\n0. **The best code is the code never written.** Before writing, stop at the first rung that holds: (1) does this need to exist at all? (YAGNI) (2) does this codebase already have it? — reuse the helper or pattern, do not re-implement. (3) does the standard library do it? (4) does a native platform feature cover it? (5) does an installed dependency solve it? (6) can it be one line? (7) only then, write the minimum that works. Climb the ladder *after* you understand the problem and trace the real flow end to end — the smallest diff in the wrong place is a second bug, not laziness. The ladder is a fast decision, not a written essay: pick the rung and move. **Bug fix = root cause, not symptom.** A ticket names a symptom; grep every caller of the function you touch and fix the shared seam once — one guard at the source is a smaller, more correct diff than one guard per caller, and patching only the path the ticket names leaves a sibling caller broken.\n\n1. **The type system is your proof system.** Make illegal states unrepresentable. The compiler / type checker is the cheapest test you will ever run. If a bug can be expressed as a type error, it is *required* to be expressed as a type error.\n\n2. **Parse, don't validate.** Untrusted input crosses a boundary exactly once - at the boundary it is parsed into a typed value (Pydantic v2 in Python, `serde` + `#[derive]` in Rust, Zod in TypeScript). Inside the boundary, code receives typed values and never re-validates. The boundary owns trust; the interior owns logic.\n\n3. **One name = one concept.** A `UserId` is not a `string`. A `Seconds` is not a `Milliseconds`. Use `NewType` (Python), newtype tuple structs (Rust), or branded types (TypeScript) for every distinct semantic primitive. The compiler refuses to let two semantic units mix.\n\n4. **Exhaustive variant matching, always.** Discriminated unions and enums are matched exhaustively. Python: `match` + `case unreachable: assert_never(unreachable)`. Rust: `match` (the compiler enforces). TypeScript: `switch` + `assertNever`. **`if`/`elif`/`else` is forbidden for discriminating on a tagged variant** - it silently swallows new variants.\n\n5. **Trust framework guarantees. Validate only at boundaries.** No null checks for values the type system already proves non-null. No `try/except` around code that cannot raise. No `unwrap`/`!`/`as` to paper over a contract you should have encoded in types. No defensive layer for a scenario you cannot name.\n\n6. **Test-driven, with the right shape of test.** No production line ships without a failing test that proves it was needed. Behavior is locked by tests, not by hope. See the TDD discipline below.\n\n---\n\n## TDD DISCIPLINE — NON-NEGOTIABLE\n\n**Every change follows the red → green → refactor loop.** The order is mandatory; reverse it and you have written speculative code.\n\n### The order\n\n1. **Red.** Write a failing test that names the behavior in `Given / When / Then`. Run it. *Confirm it fails for the right reason* — not a typo, not an import error. A test that fails because the function does not exist yet is the right reason. A test that fails because of a missing import is not.\n2. **Green.** Write the minimum code to make the test pass. Resist adding the second case until the first passes. The second case is the next red.\n3. **Refactor.** With the test green, restructure ruthlessly. The test is your safety net. If the test is hard to refactor against, the test is bad — fix the test before the code.\n\n### The shape of the test pyramid\n\nEvery feature ships with all three rungs, sized in this proportion:\n\n| Rung | Count | Purpose | Speed budget |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **Unit** | many | Pure-function correctness for every meaningful input class (happy + edges + boundaries + error paths) | < 10 ms each |\n| **Integration** | some | The real adapter against the real downstream (DB, queue, HTTP) — via `testcontainers`, `httptest`, or equivalent. NEVER a unit test pretending to be integration. | < 1 s each |\n| **E2E scenario** | few | One narrative per user-visible outcome. Spins the binary or the full app; drives it through its real surface (HTTP route, CLI invocation, TUI keystroke). Asserts the *observable outcome*, not internal state. | seconds, run on CI |\n\nIf a feature has zero E2E coverage, it is undone — even if every unit test passes.\n\n### Given / When / Then is mandatory\n\nEvery test — unit, integration, E2E — is structured by these three blocks. Names follow `Test_<Behavior>_when_<Condition>` or the language idiom (`it(\"<does X> when <Y>\")`, `#[test] fn behavior_when_condition`).\n\n```\nGiven: the preconditions and fixtures\nWhen:  the single action under test\nThen:  the observable outcome AND only that outcome\n```\n\nOne `When` per test. Multiple `When`s = multiple tests. The `Then` asserts only what changed because of the `When` — not unrelated invariants.\n\n### Less mock, the better\n\nMocks are a last resort, not a default. The priority order:\n\n1. **Real object.** Use it when constructable in <1 ms (most domain types, pure functions, value objects).\n2. **In-memory fake.** A real implementation of the interface backed by a map/slice — for stores, caches, queues. The fake has its OWN test that proves it behaves like the real one.\n3. **Testcontainer / sandbox.** Real Postgres, real Redis, real S3-compatible (MinIO), via `testcontainers`. Slow but truthful.\n4. **HTTP-level fake.** `httptest.Server` (Go), `respx` (Python), `msw` (TS) — fake at the wire, not at the SDK.\n5. **Mock.** Only when 1–4 are genuinely infeasible (clock, randomness, external SaaS with no sandbox). Then mock the **narrowest** seam — never an entire service. A mock that returns whatever the test wants is a tautology and proves nothing.\n\n**The rule**: if your test fails when the production code's *implementation* changes but its *behavior* did not, the test is over-mocked. Delete the mock; assert on observable outputs.\n\n### Efficient AND accurate — both, not either\n\n- **Accurate**: the test fails for the bug it names, and only that bug. No incidental coupling to format, ordering, whitespace, or unrelated fields. Assert on the *contract*, not on the dump.\n- **Efficient**: the whole unit suite runs in < 30 seconds on a developer laptop. The whole integration suite in < 5 minutes. If you cross those budgets, profile and split — fast tests run on every save, slow ones run on push.\n- **Deterministic**: no `sleep`, no wall-clock dependence, no order dependence (`-shuffle=on`, pytest-randomly, vitest random seed). Inject a `Clock`. Subscribe to the event, do not poll for it. Time-based flake is a bug, not a test issue.\n- **Isolated**: every test starts from a known fixture and tears down. `t.TempDir()`, `t.Setenv()`, transactional rollback for DB tests. Two tests passing individually but failing together is a fixture leak — fix it immediately. Isolation extends **across processes**: suite-global resources — sandbox/cache roots under a fixed tmpdir path, hardcoded listen ports, container names — are namespaced per run (`mktemp`, port `0`/ephemeral, unique names) so that two checkouts or worktrees of the repo running the suite concurrently cannot interfere. A fixed shared path that works on a single-checkout machine is a flake generator on a multi-agent workstation, and its signature is \"a different test fails each run\".\n\n### Prompt tests: NEVER assert prose\n\n**FORBIDDEN — NO EXCEPTIONS: a test MUST NOT assert natural-language prompt text.** `expect(prompt).toContain(\"based on GPT-5.6\")`, `not.toContain(\"old wording\")`, `toMatchSnapshot()` on prose, grepping a sentence fragment — every one of these is pretend-coverage. It stays green while the behavior it claims to guard breaks, then blocks every legitimate rewording until someone bumps the pinned string. A reviewer MUST block it as HIGH; deleting such a test is a fix, not a coverage loss. \"A nearby test already does it\" is not a defense — that test is the disease, not the convention.\n\nAssert ONLY what a machine consumes:\n\n- the builder's routing decision — `expect(getPromptSource(model)).toBe(\"gpt-5-6\")`, never the sentence that routing produces\n- a structural token the runtime dispatches on — a tool name, a tag like `<agent-identity>`, a parsed frontmatter field\n- the conditional the code enforces — skill loaded → tool present; `verbose=false` → directive absent\n- a routing-bearing trigger fragment inside a parsed frontmatter `description` that a router (code or an LLM skill-picker) dispatches on — pin the *minimal fragment that carries the routing decision*, never the surrounding style prose. Such pins are what let a later rewrite change every sentence around them while proving the routing contract survived.\n\nIf no machine consumes the text, there is no seam: write NO test and say so in the PR; review guards prose. When you DELEGATE test-writing, hand the child the behavior the test must distinguish (\"fails if override precedence breaks\"), never a ready-made assertion string, prompt fragment, or marker to copy — a prescribed mechanism that is wrong gets implemented faithfully, and the error ships with a green suite.\n\n### Anti-patterns the skill rejects\n\n| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |\n|---|---|---|\n| Writing code first, tests \"to add later\" | Tests-after rationalize the existing design, even when wrong. | Red first. Always. |\n| One mega-test asserting 12 things | First failure hides the next 11. | Split by `Then` clause — one assertion class per test. |\n| Mocking every collaborator | Test passes regardless of real behavior. | Use a fake or the real thing. Mock only true unmockables. |\n| `time.sleep(0.1)` to \"let it finish\" | Flake guaranteed. | Subscribe to the completion signal; bounded await. |\n| Snapshot tests for everything | Locks formatting, not behavior. | Snapshots for *structure* (CLI help, JSON shape). Assertions for *behavior*. |\n| Removing a failing test to \"unblock CI\" | You just deleted a bug report. | Fix the code or fix the test — never delete to silence. |\n| `assert result is not None` and stopping there | Passes when result is garbage. | Assert the *value*, not its existence. |\n| Expected value derived from the output under test (`expect(config.prompt).toBe(getPrompt(config.model))` when the criterion is about `config.prompt`) | Recomputes a projection of the output and compares it to itself — passes even when the artifact is built from the wrong input. | Derive the expected value from the test's *input*: `expect(config.prompt).toBe(getPrompt(inputModel))` (independent known-good builder fed the fixture's input), or a stable builder routing decision. |\n| Override/precedence fixture equal to its fallback (override == system default) | The assertion passes whether or not the code honored the override — precedence is never exercised. | Make every value the code must select, preserve, or override differ from its fallback. Prove it: temporarily force the regression the test names, watch it fail, revert. |\n| Single happy-path E2E, no edges | Most bugs live on edges. | Edges are unit-test territory — but include at least one E2E that exercises an error path. |\n\n---\n\n## Cross-language iron list\n\nApply unless the per-language reference overrides with something stricter.\n\n| Rule | Python | Rust | TypeScript | Go |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Immutable by default | `@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)` / Pydantic `frozen=True` | every binding is `let` (not `let mut`) unless mutation is the documented purpose | every field is `readonly`; arrays are `readonly T[]` | value types, unexported fields, no mutation methods unless mutation is the purpose |\n| Branded primitives | `UserId = NewType(\"UserId\", int)` | `struct UserId(u64);` (newtype tuple) | `type UserId = Brand<string, \"UserId\">` | `type UserID string` + smart constructor with unexported field |\n| Exhaustive variant matching | `match` + `assert_never` | `match` (compiler-enforced) | `switch` + `assertNever` | sealed interface + type switch + **`exhaustive` linter** (the compiler will not help) |\n| No untyped escape hatches | no `Any` in public sigs, no `cast`, no `# type: ignore` | no `unwrap`/`expect` outside `main`/tests, no `as` for narrowing, no `#[allow]` to silence real warnings | no `any`, no `as` (except `as const`, `satisfies`), no `!`, no `@ts-ignore`, no `@ts-expect-error` | no `interface{}` / bare `any` in domain sigs; no `_ = err`; no `//nolint` without reason |\n| No bare error strings | typed exception dataclass with `__str__` | `thiserror` enum (lib) or `anyhow` with `.context(...)` (app) | `Error` subclass with typed fields | sentinel `errors.New` + typed `*XError` struct; wrap with `%w`; check via `errors.Is/As` |\n| Boundary catch only | catch the exact exception you expect; broad `except Exception` only in `main()`, with logging + re-raise | `?` everywhere; never `panic!` in library code | `catch` must narrow with `instanceof` and re-throw or convert; no empty catch | every `(T, error)` checked; `panic` only in `main`/tests; one `httperr.Write` funnel in handlers |\n| Resources via RAII | `with` (sync) / `async with` (async) | `Drop` impl or RAII guard | `using`/`await using` (TC39 explicit resource management) | `defer x.Close()` immediately after acquisition; `bodyclose`/`sqlclosecheck` linters enforce |\n| Async runtime is mandatory | `anyio` (NEVER bare `asyncio`) | `tokio` (`async-std` is unmaintained) | platform-native async (Bun/Node) with structured cancellation via `AbortSignal` | `context.Context` as first param + `errgroup` for structured concurrency; `-race` on every test |\n| Modern HTTP client | [`httpx2`](https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2) with HTTP/2 + brotli + zstd | `reqwest` with rustls | `ky` (default) / `undici` direct API (Node perf) - NEVER bare `fetch` in prod | stdlib `net/http.Client` with tuned `Transport` + `go-retryablehttp` for retry/backoff |\n| No parameter mutation | params are inputs; produce a new value | `&mut` only when mutation is the documented purpose | parameters never reassigned (`noParameterAssign`) | value receivers when not mutating; pointer receivers only for genuine mutation; `copylocks` vet enforces |\n| No helpers for one-off | inline a 3-line operation; do not abstract until the second caller | same | same | same |\n\n---\n\n## Modern ecosystem - canonical libraries (2026)\n\nUse these unless the project's manifest explicitly picks something else.\n\n| Domain | Python | Rust | TypeScript | Go |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Data validation / boundary parse | **Pydantic v2** | **serde** + `#[derive(Deserialize)]` + `validator` | **Zod v4** (Standard Schema) | `validator/v10` (HTTP) + `protovalidate` (proto) + smart constructors (domain) |\n| Internal value object | `@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)` | newtype tuple struct or plain `struct` | `type` alias with `readonly` | struct with unexported fields + `NewX(...)` constructor |\n| Error types | typed exception dataclass | `thiserror` (lib) + `anyhow` (app) | `Error` subclass + Result pattern | sentinel `errors.New` + typed `*XError` struct + `%w` wrap |\n| HTTP client | [`httpx2`](https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2) | `reqwest` | `ky` / `undici` | stdlib `net/http` + `go-retryablehttp` |\n| Web framework | **FastAPI** | **axum** | **Hono** + `hono-openapi` | **gin** (de facto, ~48%) / `chi` (minimalist) / `connect-go` (RPC) |\n| ORM / DB | SQLAlchemy 2.x async + `asyncpg` | `sqlx` (compile-time checked) | **Drizzle** | **sqlc** (codegen from `.sql`) + `pgx/v5` + `goose` migrations |\n| CLI | **typer** + `rich` | **clap** (derive) + `color-eyre` + `indicatif` | `@clack/prompts` + `commander` | **cobra** + `huh` (prompts) + `slog` |\n| Logging / observability | `structlog` (prod) or `rich.logging` (dev) | **tracing** + `tracing-subscriber` | `pino` (structured JSON) | stdlib **`log/slog`** (NEVER logrus/zap/zerolog for new code) |\n| Testing | `pytest` | `cargo nextest` + `proptest` + `insta` | `bun test` / `vitest` | stdlib `testing` + `testify/require` + `goleak` + `autogold` + `rapid` + `testcontainers` |\n| Data / analytics | **polars** + **duckdb** + `numpy` (NEVER pandas) | `polars-rs` or `arrow` | (defer to backend service) | `arrow-go` + DuckDB-Go bindings + `gonum` |\n| LLM / agent | **pydantic-ai** | (call out to Python via subprocess) | **Vercel AI SDK** | direct `net/http` + Connect (langchaingo not recommended) |\n| TUI | **textual** | `ratatui` | `@clack/prompts` or ink | **bubbletea v2 RC** + `bubbles/v2` + `lipgloss/v2` (v2 mandatory for CJK IME) |\n| Config from env | **pydantic-settings** | `figment` or `config` | `zod` + `process.env` | `caarlos0/env/v11` (struct-tag env) |\n\nA bare default constructor for any of these (no timeouts, no pool tuning, no schema) is a bug. See the per-language reference for the canonical production defaults.\n\n---\n\n## Modern toolchain - the only acceptable setup\n\n| Tool category | Python | Rust | TypeScript | Go |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Package / project manager | **uv** (NEVER pip/poetry/conda) | **cargo** + `cargo-nextest` + `cargo-machete` + `cargo-deny` | **Bun** (runtime + package manager); pnpm if Node is forced | **`go modules`** + `go work` for monorepos |\n| Type checker | **basedpyright** with `typeCheckingMode = \"all\"` | the Rust compiler with `-D warnings` + clippy `pedantic` + `nursery` + `cargo` groups | `tsc --noEmit` (or `tsgo` when available) with `strict` + `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` + `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` + `verbatimModuleSyntax` | the Go compiler + **`golangci-lint v2`** with the strict bundle + **`nilaway`** (nil-deref static analysis) |\n| Linter + formatter | **ruff** with `select = [\"ALL\"]` | `clippy` + `rustfmt` | **Biome** (single binary - replaces ESLint + Prettier) | **`gofumpt`** (stricter gofmt) + `goimports -local` + `golangci-lint v2` |\n| Test runner | **pytest** | **cargo-nextest** | `bun test` / `vitest` | stdlib `go test -race -shuffle=on -count=1` + `goleak` |\n| UB / soundness gate | (n/a) | **nightly miri** with strict provenance + Tree Borrows pass | (n/a) | **`nilaway`** + `-race` detector + `goleak` are the equivalent gate |\n| Disposable scripts | **PEP 723** inline metadata + `uv run script.py` | **rust-script** with inline `Cargo.toml` block | `bun run script.ts` | `//go:build ignore` + `go run script.go` |\n| Bootstrap a new project | `scripts/python/new-project.py` | `scripts/rust/new-project.py` | `scripts/typescript/new-project.ts` | `scripts/go/new-project.py` |\n| Pre-commit / CI gate | `ruff check . && basedpyright && pytest` | `cargo +nightly clippy -- -D warnings && cargo nextest run && cargo +nightly miri test` | `bunx biome check . && bunx tsc --noEmit && bun test` | `gofumpt -l . && golangci-lint run ./... && nilaway ./... && go test -race -shuffle=on -count=1 ./...` |\n\nA `tsconfig.json` with `\"strict\": true` alone is **not** strict. The reference enumerates the additional flags. Same for `pyproject.toml` and `Cargo.toml` - the references contain the canonical full configuration.\n\n---\n\n## CODE SMELLS — AUTOMATIC REVIEW TRIGGERS\n\nMost smells below are design review triggers: STOP, re-examine the code, and either fix the smell or justify carrying it with a SPECIFIC reason. **The 250 pure LOC ceiling is stricter: >250 is a DEFECT. Refactor before adding lines except for rare SIZE_OK or pure-data-table exceptions.**\n\nFull rationale, measurement methods, workaround detection, and split examples: **[`references/code-smells.md`](references/code-smells.md)**.\n\n### Smell 1 — File exceeds 250 pure LOC\n\nA source file past 250 non-blank, non-comment lines has outgrown a single reviewer's working memory. The module is almost certainly doing more than one thing. Measure: `awk '!/^[[:space:]]*$/ && !/^[[:space:]]*(\\/\\/|#|--)/' <file> | wc -l`.\n\n**When detected:** Name what the file owns in one short noun phrase. If the answer needs \"and\", the file needs splitting. Load `/refactor` and split by responsibility. If the file genuinely cannot be split (generated parser, indivisible state machine), mark with `// allow: SIZE_OK — <reason>`.\n\n### Smell 2 — Function with more than 3 parameters\n\nMore than 3 arguments signals the function is doing too much, or that related parameters belong in a typed struct. **Workarounds count as the same smell** — passing `dict`/`Record<string, unknown>`/`map[string]any`/`**kwargs`/`...args` to smuggle parameters through one argument, or a throwaway \"config\" object with 6+ fields that exists solely to wrap what would otherwise be positional args (genuine reusable domain types like `HttpClientConfig` are fine).\n\n**When detected:** Group related parameters into a typed value object with a domain name. If 4+ independent inputs are genuinely required, the justification must be SPECIFIC. See [`references/code-smells.md` Smell 2](references/code-smells.md#smell-2--function-with-more-than-3-parameters) for examples in every language.\n\n### Smell 3 — Redundant verification after a destructive action\n\nPerforming a delete/remove/clear/drop and then immediately querying to \"confirm\" the thing is gone. **The operation's contract IS the verification.** Re-checking is AI-generated defensive bloat that wastes cycles and teaches the reader the operation is unreliable — which it is not. Same smell: calling a setter then getting to \"confirm\", writing a file then reading it back, inserting a row then SELECT-ing it, pushing to an array then checking `.length`.\n\n**When detected:** Delete the verification code. Trust the operation's contract. If the operation can genuinely fail silently, fix the operation — do not paper over it with a post-check. See [`references/code-smells.md` Smell 3](references/code-smells.md#smell-3--redundant-verification-after-a-destructive-action) for examples.\n\n### Smell 4 — Negative-form names and conditions\n\nNaming variables, functions, or flags by the **absence** of a quality (`isNotValid`, `noErrors`, `cannotProceed`, `DisableLogging`) instead of its **presence** (`isValid`, `isClean`, `canProceed`, `LoggingEnabled`). Every negation forces the reader to invert mentally; two negations (`if !isNotReady`) become a logic puzzle nobody reviews confidently.\n\n**When detected:** Rename to the positive form and invert the branch logic. Negation IS appropriate in guard clauses (`if !authorized { return }`) and filters (`items.filter(|x| !x.is_expired())`) — the negative form is the intent there. See [`references/code-smells.md` Smell 4](references/code-smells.md#smell-4--negative-form-names-and-conditions) for the full naming table and examples.\n\n---\n\n## LOGGING — CROSS-CUTTING RULES\n\nLogging is part of the code you ship, and it has iron rules of its own: levels chosen by naming the consumer (never by severity vibes), placement at decision points (never inside helpers), stable messages with structured fields — and, above everything else, **the project's existing practice wins: a project with a designated logger gets that logger and nothing else, and a project that does not log does not get logging uninvited.**\n\n**Read [`references/logging.md`](references/logging.md) BEFORE the change** whenever your edit adds or modifies log lines, sets up a logger or a new service entrypoint, or handles errors at a boundary.\n\n---\n\n## DEPENDENCY UPGRADES — CROSS-CUTTING RULES\n\n- **`0.x` minor = major.** Semver promises nothing below 1.0: treat `0.N → 0.N+1` as a breaking upgrade — read the changelog, build, and run the full suite before trusting it. A required field appearing in a public options type is a routine `0.x` \"minor\".\n- **Version literals live outside the manifest.** Before committing a bump, grep the repo for the old version string: Dockerfiles pinning a global CLI, CI workflows, and docs all carry copies. A bump that updates only the package manifest ships a split-brain deploy.\n- **Never hand-merge a lockfile.** On conflict, take either side whole and regenerate with the package manager — the resolver owns that file, not you.\n\n---\n\n## MANDATORY POST-WRITE REVIEW LOOP\n\n**This runs EVERY time you finish writing or substantively editing code, before you claim the task is done.** No exceptions.\n\n### Step 1 — measure\n\nFor every file you created or modified:\n\n```bash\nawk '!/^[[:space:]]*$/ && !/^[[:space:]]*(\\/\\/|#|--)/' <file> | wc -l\n```\n\nOr run the per-language checker the skill ships:\n\n```bash\n# Python\nuv run scripts/python/check-no-excuse-rules.py <changed paths>\n# Rust\nbash scripts/rust/check-no-excuse-rules.sh <changed paths>\n# TypeScript\nbun run scripts/typescript/check-no-excuse-rules.ts <changed paths>\n```\n\n### Step 2 — interpret\n\n| Pure LOC | Verdict | Required action |\n|---|---|---|\n| ≤ 200 | Healthy | continue |\n| 200 - 250 | **Warning band** | State that fact and propose a split if the next edit will add lines. |\n| > 250 | **DEFECT** | Do NOT commit new lines to this file. Refactor now: split the touched unit before adding lines, except for rare SIZE_OK or pure-data-table exceptions. |\n\n### Step 3 — architectural self-review (always, even at 80 LOC)\n\nAfter every code-writing session, answer these out loud (in your reply) before declaring done:\n\n1. **Single responsibility?** Can I name what this file owns in one short noun phrase? If the answer needs the word \"and\", split.\n2. **Boundary purity?** Did I parse untrusted input into a typed value at the boundary, or did I pass `dict[str, Any]` / `serde_json::Value` / `unknown` past the boundary? If the latter, fix it.\n3. **Variant discrimination?** Did I use `if`/`elif`/`else` (or `switch` without `assertNever`, or `match` without `assert_never`) anywhere to discriminate on a tagged type or enum? If yes, rewrite as exhaustive match.\n4. **Escape hatches?** Any `Any`, `# type: ignore`, `unwrap`, `expect` outside `main`/tests, `as` numeric cast, `!`, `@ts-ignore`, `@ts-expect-error`, `#[allow]` on a real warning? If yes, fix the type or document why with a comment.\n5. **Defensive layer?** Any null check, try/except, or `isinstance` guarding a value the type system already proves? If yes, delete.\n6. **Helpers for one-off?** Any function, class, or trait introduced for a single caller that will never get a second caller? If yes, inline — axiom 0 should have caught it pre-write; this is the backstop.\n7. **Tests?** Is the behavior I just introduced locked by a test that would fail if I revert this commit?\n8. **Parameter bloat?** Any function I wrote or modified that takes more than 3 parameters — or smuggles them through a dict/kwargs/`...args`/throwaway options object? If yes, group related params into a typed value object. See [Smell 2](references/code-smells.md#smell-2--function-with-more-than-3-parameters).\n9. **Redundant verification?** Did I perform a destructive action (delete, remove, clear) and then immediately re-query to \"confirm\" it worked? Did I call a setter then a getter to \"verify\"? If yes, delete the verification — the operation's contract IS the proof. See [Smell 3](references/code-smells.md#smell-3--redundant-verification-after-a-destructive-action).\n10. **Negative naming?** Any variable, function, or flag named by the absence of a quality (`isNotValid`, `noErrors`, `DisableX`) when a positive name (`isValid`, `isClean`, `EnableX`) would work? If yes, rename to positive form and invert the branch. See [Smell 4](references/code-smells.md#smell-4--negative-form-names-and-conditions).\n11. **Logging?** If I touched log lines, logger setup, or error boundaries: did I follow the project's existing practice (including its absence)? Is every new line leveled by its consumer, placed at a decision point, and message-stable with data in fields? See [`references/logging.md`](references/logging.md).\n\n**If any answer fails, fix it before declaring done.** This loop is the difference between \"the code compiles\" and \"the code is correct.\"\n\n### Step 4 — if you need to refactor right now, invoke the right skill\n\n- Any code smell from the [CODE SMELLS section](#code-smells--automatic-review-triggers) fired (250+ LOC, >3 params, redundant verification, negative naming), or step 3 surfaced more than two issues: **load the `refactor` skill** and execute its safe-refactor protocol (codemap, plan, LSP-driven edits, test after each step). Do not improvise a refactor under time pressure — the refactor skill exists precisely so you do not corrupt behavior while reshaping structure.\n- You inherited a branch with AI-generated patterns (broad `except`, redundant null checks, vague TODOs, oversized modules, dead helpers, redundant post-action verification): **load the `remove-ai-slops` skill** to do a categorized branch-scope cleanup with regression tests pinned first.\n\nThese two skills are not optional cosmetics. They are the recovery path for the smells this loop is designed to catch.\n\n---\n\n## Companion skills - explicit invocation triggers\n\n| Trigger | Skill to load | Why |\n|---|---|---|\n| Any [code smell](#code-smells--automatic-review-triggers) fires (250+ LOC, >3 params, redundant verification), OR the post-write loop surfaces 2+ issues, OR the user says \"reshape this\", \"extract this\", \"clean this up\" | `refactor` | Safe codemap-driven multi-step refactor with LSP + tests after each step. Never improvise a structural change. |\n| Recent branch contains AI-authored patterns (broad except, dead helpers, vague comments, oversized files, redundant post-action verification), OR the user says \"remove slop\", \"clean AI code\", \"deslop\" | `remove-ai-slops` | Tests pinned FIRST, then categorized parallel cleanup, then quality gates. Behavior-preserving. |\n| Rust code touches `unsafe`, `*mut`, `*const`, `MaybeUninit`, FFI, `unsafe impl Send/Sync`, or a custom lock-free primitive | `references/rust-ub/` | Full UB taxonomy + Miri strictness escalation. Every `unsafe` block must survive Miri Level 3 (strict provenance + symbolic alignment + preemption) before it ships. |\n\n---\n\n## Per-language jump table\n\n**Stop. Read the matching reference fully before writing code.**\n\n### Python (`.py`, `.pyi`)\n\n**READ `references/python/README.md` FIRST.** Then load on demand:\n\n| Need | Load |\n|---|---|\n| Strict pyproject.toml / basedpyright / ruff config | `references/python/pyproject-strict.md` |\n| Type patterns (`NewType`, `Final`, `TypeGuard`, `Protocol`) | `references/python/type-patterns.md` |\n| Data modeling (Pydantic vs dataclass vs TypedDict vs StrEnum) | `references/python/data-modeling.md` |\n| Error handling (typed exceptions, exhaustive match, union returns) | `references/python/error-handling.md` |\n| Async with anyio (task groups, cancel scopes, channels) | `references/python/async-anyio.md` |\n| httpx2 production defaults (HTTP/2, brotli+zstd, pool tuning) | `references/python/httpx2-optimization.md` |\n| **orjson** in hot paths (FastAPI integration, Pydantic v2 `model_dump_json` vs orjson, Redis/queue/log) | `references/python/orjson-stack.md` |\n| Data processing with polars + duckdb (NEVER pandas) | `references/python/data-processing.md` |\n| FastAPI + SQLAlchemy 2.x async stack | `references/python/fastapi-stack.md` |\n| pydantic-ai agents | `references/python/pydantic-ai.md` |\n| Textual TUI | `references/python/textual-tui.md` |\n| Disposable PEP 723 scripts | `references/python/one-liners.md` |\n| Canonical library defaults | `references/python/libraries.md` |\n\n### Rust (`.rs`, `Cargo.toml`)\n\n**READ `references/rust/README.md` FIRST.** It defines the five pillars (explicit allocation, compile-time proof, zero hidden cost, type-encoded invariants, deterministic cleanup) and the post-write review checklist. Then load on demand:\n\n| Need | Load |\n|---|---|\n| **Arena allocation, const fn, zero-alloc APIs, bitfield, scopeguard, errdefer, Zig-like patterns** | **`references/rust/zero-cost-safety.md`** |\n| Strict `Cargo.toml` lints + profile + workspace config | `references/rust/cargo-strict.md` |\n| Type-state and newtype patterns (Chris Allen's `Point<Screen>` rule) | `references/rust/type-state.md` |\n| `unsafe` discipline (safe wrapper + SAFETY comment + miri proof) | `references/rust/unsafe-discipline.md` |\n| Async with tokio (JoinSet, cancellation, select, blocking work) | `references/rust/async-tokio.md` |\n| Concurrency primitives (locks, atomics, channels, loom) | `references/rust/concurrency.md` |\n| axum + sqlx + tracing + tower HTTP stack | `references/rust/axum-stack.md` |\n| clap + color-eyre + tracing + indicatif CLI stack | `references/rust/clap-stack.md` |\n| Property tests (proptest) + snapshot tests (insta) | `references/rust/proptest-insta.md` |\n| Disposable `rust-script` scripts | `references/rust/one-liners.md` |\n| Canonical library defaults | `references/rust/libraries.md` |\n| **ANY `unsafe` / FFI / `MaybeUninit` / lock-free work** | **`references/rust-ub/` (full directory)** |\n\n### TypeScript (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.mts`, `.cts`)\n\n**READ `references/typescript/README.md` FIRST.** Then load on demand:\n\n| Need | Load |\n|---|---|\n| Strict tsconfig + Biome config | `references/typescript/tsconfig-strict.md` |\n| Type patterns (branded types, `as const`, `satisfies`, narrowing, `assertNever`) | `references/typescript/type-patterns.md` |\n| Data modeling (type vs interface vs Zod, readonly, parse-don't-validate) | `references/typescript/data-modeling.md` |\n| Error handling (Result, typed errors, union vs throw, AbortSignal timeouts) | `references/typescript/error-handling.md` |\n| Bootstrapping a new project (Bun, pnpm, Hono, Vite) | `references/typescript/bootstrap.md` |\n| Hono backend stack (hono-openapi, Scalar, Swagger, Zod v4) | `references/typescript/backend-hono.md` |\n\n### Go (`.go`, `go.mod`, `go.sum`, `.golangci.yml`, `*.proto`)\n\n**READ `references/go/README.md` FIRST.** Then load on demand:\n\n| Need | Load |\n|---|---|\n| Library defaults (gin vs chi, sqlc, slog, the 2026 stack reasoning) | `references/go/libraries.md` |\n| Canonical strict `.golangci.yml` (v2) with per-linter rationale | `references/go/golangci-strict.md` |\n| Project layout, Taskfile, CI, `go.mod` template | `references/go/bootstrap.md` |\n| Type patterns (named types, smart constructors, sealed interfaces, generics) | `references/go/type-patterns.md` |\n| Data modeling — the three layers of validation (validator/v10 → smart ctor → sqlc) | `references/go/data-modeling.md` |\n| Error handling (`errors.Is/As`, typed errors, `%w` wrapping, no panic) | `references/go/error-handling.md` |\n| Concurrency (`context.Context`, `errgroup`, channels, locks, `-race`, `goleak`) | `references/go/concurrency.md` |\n| HTTP backend stack (gin + slog + validator + pgx, middleware ordering, SSE, WS) | `references/go/backend-stack.md` |\n| RPC stack (Connect-Go default, grpc-go fallback, protovalidate, Buf) | `references/go/grpc-connect.md` |\n| CLI stack (cobra + slog + huh) | `references/go/cobra-stack.md` |\n| Database stack (sqlc + pgx + goose + testcontainers) | `references/go/sqlc-pgx.md` |\n| TUI stack (bubbletea v2 + bubbles v2 + lipgloss v2; **CJK / IME support**) | `references/go/bubbletea-v2.md` |\n| Testing (Given/When/Then, table-driven, fakes-over-mocks, autogold, rapid) | `references/go/testing.md` |\n| Disposable `go run` scripts | `references/go/one-liners.md` |\n\n---\n\n## Activation\n\nThis skill activates whenever you are writing or modifying any `.py`, `.pyi`, `.rs`, `.ts`, `.tsx`, `.mts`, `.cts`, `.go` file, or any project manifest (`pyproject.toml`, `Cargo.toml`, `package.json`, `tsconfig.json`, `biome.json`, `go.mod`, `go.sum`, `.golangci.yml`, `Taskfile.yml`, `buf.yaml`, `sqlc.yaml`). **Even one-off scripts get the full treatment** - that is the whole point of `uv run` + PEP 723, `rust-script`, `bun run`, and `go run` + `//go:build ignore`: production hygiene with throwaway ergonomics.\n\nThe references contain the recipes. **Read them before writing code. Re-read them when the model drifts.** The post-write review loop is non-negotiable.\n</skill>\n\n<skill name=\"refactor\" location=\"/projects/richard/omo-native-pirate/packages/omo-senpi/plugin/skills/refactor/SKILL.md\">\nReferences are relative to /projects/richard/omo-native-pirate/packages/omo-senpi/plugin/skills/refactor.\n\n## Senpi Harness Tool Compatibility\n\nThis skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Senpi, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Senpi native tools:\n\n| OpenCode example | Senpi tool to use |\n| --- | --- |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"explore\", ...)` | `task` tool with `subagent_type: \"explore\"` |\n| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type=\"librarian\", ...)` | `task` tool with `subagent_type: \"librarian\"` |\n| worker/implementation `task(...)` | `task` tool with `category` from the delegation router (`quick`, `unspecified-low`, `unspecified-high`, `deep`, `ultrabrain`, `visual-engineering`, `writing`); honor the plan's `Recommended task executor category:` line |\n| final-review / gate-reviewer `task(...)` | fresh `task` with `category: \"unspecified-high\"` (or `\"deep\"`) and an adversarial-verifier prompt; `momus`/`metis` are plan-gated curated reviewers, spawnable only while the plan gate is open |\n| `background_output(task_id=\"...\")` | `task_output` tool with the task id |\n| `team_*(...)` | Lead team tools (`team_create`, `task_create`, ...); send with `task_send` |\n| a watcher on a lane's completion state | `monitor` to arm it, `kill_bash` to tear it down |\n\nIf a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.\n\nexport const REFACTOR_TEMPLATE = `# Intelligent Refactor Command\n\n## Usage\n\\`\\`\\`\n/refactor <refactoring-target> [--scope=<file|module|project>] [--strategy=<safe|aggressive>]\n\nArguments:\n  refactoring-target: What to refactor. Can be:\n    - File path: src/auth/handler.ts\n    - Symbol name: \"AuthService class\"\n    - Pattern: \"all functions using deprecated API\"\n    - Description: \"extract validation logic into separate module\"\n\nOptions:\n  --scope: Refactoring scope (default: module)\n    - file: Single file only\n    - module: Module/directory scope\n    - project: Entire codebase\n\n  --strategy: Risk tolerance (default: safe)\n    - safe: Conservative, maximum test coverage required\n    - aggressive: Allow broader changes with adequate coverage\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## What This Command Does\n\nPerforms intelligent, deterministic refactoring with full codebase awareness. Unlike blind search-and-replace, this command:\n\n1. **Understands your intent** - Analyzes what you actually want to achieve\n2. **Maps the codebase** - Builds a definitive codemap before touching anything\n3. **Assesses risk** - Evaluates test coverage and determines verification strategy\n4. **Plans meticulously** - Creates a detailed plan with Plan agent\n5. **Executes precisely** - Step-by-step refactoring with LSP and AST-grep\n6. **Verifies constantly** - Runs tests after each change to ensure zero regression\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 0: INTENT GATE (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)\n\n**BEFORE ANY ACTION, classify and validate the request.**\n\n## Step 0.1: Parse Request Type\n\n| Signal | Classification | Action |\n|--------|----------------|--------|\n| Specific file/symbol | Explicit | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Refactor X to Y\" | Clear transformation | Proceed to codebase analysis |\n| \"Improve\", \"Clean up\" | Open-ended | **MUST ask**: \"What specific improvement?\" |\n| Ambiguous scope | Uncertain | **MUST ask**: \"Which modules/files?\" |\n| Missing context | Incomplete | **MUST ask**: \"What's the desired outcome?\" |\n\n## Step 0.2: Validate Understanding\n\nBefore proceeding, confirm:\n- [ ] Target is clearly identified\n- [ ] Desired outcome is understood\n- [ ] Scope is defined (file/module/project)\n- [ ] Success criteria can be articulated\n\n**If ANY of above is unclear, ASK CLARIFYING QUESTION:**\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nI want to make sure I understand the refactoring goal correctly.\n\n**What I understood**: [interpretation]\n**What I'm unsure about**: [specific ambiguity]\n\nOptions I see:\n1. [Option A] - [implications]\n2. [Option B] - [implications]\n\n**My recommendation**: [suggestion with reasoning]\n\nShould I proceed with [recommendation], or would you prefer differently?\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## Step 0.3: Create Initial Todos\n\n**IMMEDIATELY after understanding the request, create todos:**\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nTodoWrite([\n  {\"id\": \"phase-1\", \"content\": \"PHASE 1: Codebase Analysis - launch parallel explore agents\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-2\", \"content\": \"PHASE 2: Build Codemap - map dependencies and impact zones\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-3\", \"content\": \"PHASE 3: Test Assessment - analyze test coverage and verification strategy\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-4\", \"content\": \"PHASE 4: Plan Generation - invoke Plan agent for detailed refactoring plan\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-5\", \"content\": \"PHASE 5: Execute Refactoring - step-by-step with continuous verification\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"phase-6\", \"content\": \"PHASE 6: Final Verification - full test suite and regression check\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"}\n])\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 1: CODEBASE ANALYSIS (PARALLEL EXPLORATION)\n\n**Mark phase-1 as in_progress.**\n\n## 1.1: Launch Parallel Explore Agents (BACKGROUND)\n\nFire ALL of these simultaneously using \\`call_omo_agent\\`:\n\n\\`\\`\\`\n// Agent 1: Find the refactoring target\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all occurrences and definitions of [TARGET].\n  Report: file paths, line numbers, usage patterns.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 2: Find related code\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all code that imports, uses, or depends on [TARGET].\n  Report: dependency chains, import graphs.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 3: Find similar patterns\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find similar code patterns to [TARGET] in the codebase.\n  Report: analogous implementations, established conventions.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 4: Find tests\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find all test files related to [TARGET].\n  Report: test file paths, test case names, coverage indicators.\"\n)\n\n// Agent 5: Architecture context\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=true,\n  prompt=\"Find architectural patterns and module organization around [TARGET].\n  Report: module boundaries, layer structure, design patterns in use.\"\n)\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 1.2: Direct Tool Exploration (WHILE AGENTS RUN)\n\nWhile background agents are running, use direct tools:\n\n### LSP Tools for Precise Analysis:\n\n\\`\\`\\`typescript\n// Find definition(s)\nLspGotoDefinition(filePath, line, character)  // Where is it defined?\n\n// Find ALL usages across workspace\nLspFindReferences(filePath, line, character, includeDeclaration=true)\n\n// Get file structure\nLspDocumentSymbols(filePath)  // Hierarchical outline\nLspWorkspaceSymbols(filePath, query=\"[target_symbol]\")  // Search by name\n\n// Get current diagnostics\nlsp_diagnostics(filePath)  // Errors, warnings before we start\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n### AST-Grep Skill for Pattern Analysis:\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n// Find structural patterns\npython3 scripts/ast_grep_helper.py search 'function $NAME($$$) { $$$ }' --lang ts src/\n\n# Preview refactoring first\nsg --pattern '[old_pattern]' --rewrite '[new_pattern]' --lang ts src/\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n### Grep for Text Patterns:\n\n\\`\\`\\`\ngrep(pattern=\"[search_term]\", path=\"src/\", include=\"*.ts\")\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 1.3: Collect Background Results\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_1_id]\")\nbackground_output(task_id=\"[agent_2_id]\")\n...\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Mark phase-1 as completed after all results collected.**\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 2: BUILD CODEMAP (DEPENDENCY MAPPING)\n\n**Mark phase-2 as in_progress.**\n\n## 2.1: Construct Definitive Codemap\n\nBased on Phase 1 results, build:\n\n\\`\\`\\`\n## CODEMAP: [TARGET]\n\n### Core Files (Direct Impact)\n- \\`path/to/file.ts:L10-L50\\` - Primary definition\n- \\`path/to/file2.ts:L25\\` - Key usage\n\n### Dependency Graph\n\\`\\`\\`\n[TARGET]\n├── imports from:\n│   ├── module-a (types)\n│   └── module-b (utils)\n├── imported by:\n│   ├── consumer-1.ts\n│   ├── consumer-2.ts\n│   └── consumer-3.ts\n└── used by:\n    ├── handler.ts (direct call)\n    └── service.ts (dependency injection)\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n### Impact Zones\n| Zone | Risk Level | Files Affected | Test Coverage |\n|------|------------|----------------|---------------|\n| Core | HIGH | 3 files | 85% covered |\n| Consumers | MEDIUM | 8 files | 70% covered |\n| Edge | LOW | 2 files | 50% covered |\n\n### Established Patterns\n- Pattern A: [description] - used in N places\n- Pattern B: [description] - established convention\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 2.2: Identify Refactoring Constraints\n\nBased on codemap:\n- **MUST follow**: [existing patterns identified]\n- **MUST NOT break**: [critical dependencies]\n- **Safe to change**: [isolated code zones]\n- **Requires migration**: [breaking changes impact]\n\n**Mark phase-2 as completed.**\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 3: TEST ASSESSMENT (VERIFICATION STRATEGY)\n\n**Mark phase-3 as in_progress.**\n\n## 3.1: Detect Test Infrastructure\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n# Check for test commands\ncat package.json | jq '.scripts | keys[] | select(test(\"test\"))'\n\n# Or for Python\nls -la pytest.ini pyproject.toml setup.cfg\n\n# Or for Go\nls -la *_test.go\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 3.2: Analyze Test Coverage\n\n\\`\\`\\`\n// Find all tests related to target\ncall_omo_agent(\n  subagent_type=\"explore\",\n  run_in_background=false,  // Need this synchronously\n  prompt=\"Analyze test coverage for [TARGET]:\n  1. Which test files cover this code?\n  2. What test cases exist?\n  3. Are there integration tests?\n  4. What edge cases are tested?\n  5. Estimated coverage percentage?\"\n)\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 3.3: Determine Verification Strategy\n\nBased on test analysis:\n\n| Coverage Level | Strategy |\n|----------------|----------|\n| HIGH (>80%) | Run existing tests after each step |\n| MEDIUM (50-80%) | Run tests + add safety assertions |\n| LOW (<50%) | **PAUSE**: Propose adding tests first |\n| NONE | **BLOCK**: Refuse aggressive refactoring |\n\n**If coverage is LOW or NONE, ask user:**\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nTest coverage for [TARGET] is [LEVEL].\n\n**Risk Assessment**: Refactoring without adequate tests is dangerous.\n\nOptions:\n1. Add tests first, then refactor (RECOMMENDED)\n2. Proceed with extra caution, manual verification required\n3. Abort refactoring\n\nWhich approach do you prefer?\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 3.4: Document Verification Plan\n\n\\`\\`\\`\n## VERIFICATION PLAN\n\n### Test Commands\n- Unit: \\`bun test\\` / \\`npm test\\` / \\`pytest\\` / etc.\n- Integration: [command if exists]\n- Type check: \\`tsc --noEmit\\` / \\`pyright\\` / etc.\n\n### Verification Checkpoints\nAfter each refactoring step:\n1. lsp_diagnostics → zero new errors\n2. Run test command → all pass\n3. Type check → clean\n\n### Regression Indicators\n- [Specific test that must pass]\n- [Behavior that must be preserved]\n- [API contract that must not change]\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Mark phase-3 as completed.**\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 4: PLAN GENERATION (PLAN AGENT)\n\n**Mark phase-4 as in_progress.**\n\n## 4.1: Invoke Plan Agent\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nTask(\n  category=\"deep\",\n  prompt=\"Create a detailed refactoring plan:\n\n  ## Refactoring Goal\n  [User's original request]\n\n  ## Codemap (from Phase 2)\n  [Insert codemap here]\n\n  ## Test Coverage (from Phase 3)\n  [Insert verification plan here]\n\n  ## Constraints\n  - MUST follow existing patterns: [list]\n  - MUST NOT break: [critical paths]\n  - MUST run tests after each step\n\n  ## Requirements\n  1. Break down into atomic refactoring steps\n  2. Each step must be independently verifiable\n  3. Order steps by dependency (what must happen first)\n  4. Specify exact files and line ranges for each step\n  5. Include rollback strategy for each step\n  6. Define commit checkpoints\"\n)\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 4.2: Review and Validate Plan\n\nAfter receiving plan from Plan agent:\n\n1. **Verify completeness**: All identified files addressed?\n2. **Verify safety**: Each step reversible?\n3. **Verify order**: Dependencies respected?\n4. **Verify verification**: Test commands specified?\n\n## 4.3: Register Detailed Todos\n\nConvert Plan agent output into granular todos:\n\n\\`\\`\\`\nTodoWrite([\n  // Each step from the plan becomes a todo\n  {\"id\": \"refactor-1\", \"content\": \"Step 1: [description]\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"verify-1\", \"content\": \"Verify Step 1: run tests\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"high\"},\n  {\"id\": \"refactor-2\", \"content\": \"Step 2: [description]\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"medium\"},\n  {\"id\": \"verify-2\", \"content\": \"Verify Step 2: run tests\", \"status\": \"pending\", \"priority\": \"medium\"},\n  // ... continue for all steps\n])\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Mark phase-4 as completed.**\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 5: EXECUTE REFACTORING (DETERMINISTIC EXECUTION)\n\n**Mark phase-5 as in_progress.**\n\n## 5.1: Execution Protocol\n\nFor EACH refactoring step:\n\n### Pre-Step\n1. Mark step todo as \\`in_progress\\`\n2. Read current file state\n3. Verify lsp_diagnostics is baseline\n\n### Execute Step\nUse appropriate tool:\n\n**For Symbol Renames:**\n\\`\\`\\`typescript\nlsp_prepare_rename(filePath, line, character)  // Validate rename is possible\nlsp_rename(filePath, line, character, newName)  // Execute rename\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**For Pattern Transformations:**\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n// Preview first\nsg --pattern '[pattern]' --rewrite '[rewrite]' --lang ts path/to/file.ts\n\n// If preview looks good, execute\npython3 scripts/ast_grep_helper.py replace '[pattern]' '[rewrite]' --lang ts path/to/file.ts --apply\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**For Structural Changes:**\n\\`\\`\\`typescript\n// Use Edit tool for precise changes\nedit(filePath, oldString, newString)\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n### Post-Step Verification (MANDATORY)\n\n\\`\\`\\`typescript\n// 1. Check diagnostics\nlsp_diagnostics(filePath)  // Must be clean or same as baseline\n\n// 2. Run tests\nbash(\"bun test\")  // Or appropriate test command\n\n// 3. Type check\nbash(\"tsc --noEmit\")  // Or appropriate type check\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n### Step Completion\n1. If verification passes → Mark step todo as \\`completed\\`\n2. If verification fails → **STOP AND FIX**\n\n## 5.2: Failure Recovery Protocol\n\nIf ANY verification fails:\n\n1. **STOP** immediately\n2. **REVERT** the failed change\n3. **DIAGNOSE** what went wrong\n4. **OPTIONS**:\n   - Fix the issue and retry\n   - Skip this step (if optional)\n   - Consult oracle agent for help\n   - Ask user for guidance\n\n**NEVER proceed to next step with broken tests.**\n\n## 5.3: Commit Checkpoints\n\nAfter each logical group of changes:\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\ngit add [changed-files]\ngit commit -m \"refactor(scope): description\n\n[details of what was changed and why]\"\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Mark phase-5 as completed when all refactoring steps done.**\n\n---\n\n# PHASE 6: FINAL VERIFICATION (REGRESSION CHECK)\n\n**Mark phase-6 as in_progress.**\n\n## 6.1: Full Test Suite\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n# Run complete test suite\nbun test  # or npm test, pytest, go test, etc.\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 6.2: Type Check\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n# Full type check\ntsc --noEmit  # or equivalent\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 6.3: Lint Check\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n# Run linter\neslint .  # or equivalent\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 6.4: Build Verification (if applicable)\n\n\\`\\`\\`bash\n# Ensure build still works\nbun run build  # or npm run build, etc.\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 6.5: Final Diagnostics\n\n\\`\\`\\`typescript\n// Check all changed files\nfor (file of changedFiles) {\n  lsp_diagnostics(file)  // Must all be clean\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n## 6.6: Generate Summary\n\n\\`\\`\\`markdown\n## Refactoring Complete\n\n### What Changed\n- [List of changes made]\n\n### Files Modified\n- \\`path/to/file.ts\\` - [what changed]\n- \\`path/to/file2.ts\\` - [what changed]\n\n### Verification Results\n- Tests: PASSED (X/Y passing)\n- Type Check: CLEAN\n- Lint: CLEAN\n- Build: SUCCESS\n\n### No Regressions Detected\nAll existing tests pass. No new errors introduced.\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Mark phase-6 as completed.**\n\n---\n\n# CRITICAL RULES\n\n## NEVER DO\n- Skip lsp_diagnostics check after changes\n- Proceed with failing tests\n- Make changes without understanding impact\n- Use \\`as any\\`, \\`@ts-ignore\\`, \\`@ts-expect-error\\`\n- Delete tests to make them pass\n- Commit broken code\n- Refactor without understanding existing patterns\n\n## ALWAYS DO\n- Understand before changing\n- Preview before applying (`sg --pattern ... --rewrite ... --lang ...`)\n- Verify after every change\n- Follow existing codebase patterns\n- Keep todos updated in real-time\n- Commit at logical checkpoints\n- Report issues immediately\n\n## ABORT CONDITIONS\nIf any of these occur, **STOP and consult user**:\n- Test coverage is zero for target code\n- Changes would break public API\n- Refactoring scope is unclear\n- 3 consecutive verification failures\n- User-defined constraints violated\n\n---\n\n# Tool Usage Philosophy\n\nYou already know these tools. Use them intelligently:\n\n## LSP Tools\nLeverage LSP tools for precision analysis. Key patterns:\n- **Understand before changing**: \\`LspGotoDefinition\\` to grasp context\n- **Impact analysis**: \\`LspFindReferences\\` to map all usages before modification\n- **Safe refactoring**: \\`lsp_prepare_rename\\` → \\`lsp_rename\\` for symbol renames\n- **Continuous verification**: \\`lsp_diagnostics\\` after every change\n\n## AST-Grep\nUse \\`ast-grep\\` skill helper or \\`sg\\` CLI for structural transformations.\n**Critical**: Always preview first, review, then execute.\n\n## Agents\n- \\`explore\\`: Parallel codebase pattern discovery\n- \\`plan\\`: Detailed refactoring plan generation\n- \\`oracle\\`: Read-only consultation for complex architectural decisions and debugging\n- \\`librarian\\`: **Use proactively** when encountering deprecated methods or library migration tasks. Query official docs and OSS examples for modern replacements.\n\n## Deprecated Code & Library Migration\nWhen you encounter deprecated methods/APIs during refactoring:\n1. Fire \\`librarian\\` to find the recommended modern alternative\n2. **DO NOT auto-upgrade to latest version** unless user explicitly requests migration\n3. If user requests library migration, use \\`librarian\\` to fetch latest API docs before making changes\n\n---\n\n**Remember: Refactoring without tests is reckless. Refactoring without understanding is destructive. This command ensures you do neither.**\n\n<user-request>\n$ARGUMENTS\n</user-request>\n`\n\nexport const REFACTOR_TEAM_MODE_ADDENDUM = `\n---\n\n# Team Mode Protocol (active when team_* tools are present)\n\nTeam mode is enabled for this session. The rules below **override Phase 4-6** above. Follow this protocol instead of the in-session step-by-step execution.\n\n## Phase 4 override: Plan agent staffing requirement\n\nWhen invoking the Plan agent in Phase 4.1, append this additional requirement to the prompt:\n\n\\`\\`\\`\n7. (REQUIRED when team mode is active) Output a Team Staffing Recommendation section with these fields — missing fields fail Phase 5.0:\n   - total_atomic_steps: integer\n   - file_independent_steps: integer (parallelizable, no cross-file blocker)\n   - cross_file_dependent_steps: integer (has blockers)\n   - per_step_assignment: [{step_id, assigned_to: 'quick' | 'unspecified-low', blockedBy: [step_ids], rationale}]\n   - dispatch_path_recommendation: 'team' | 'legacy' with reason\n   - rationale for the composition\n\\`\\`\\`\n\n**Classification rules** the plan agent must apply to each step:\n- \\`quick\\`: mechanical edits — LSP rename, extract variable, inline, simple move, signature change without call-site logic.\n- \\`unspecified-low\\`: logic-preserving refactors that need reasoning — extract function, restructure conditional, pattern transformation, cross-file API change.\n- Recommend \\`team\\` path when \\`file_independent_steps >= 3\\`; recommend \\`legacy\\` otherwise.\n\n## Phase 5 override: Dispatch path selection\n\nRead the Team Staffing Recommendation from Phase 4. If any required field is missing, fail here and re-request the plan with the exact missing field names. Do not proceed with a partial plan.\n\nThen choose the path:\n\n- **Team path (5.1-T)**: when the plan recommends \\`team\\` AND \\`file_independent_steps >= 3\\`. Members execute in parallel, Lead orchestrates, a \\`deep\\` verifier lives outside the team.\n- **Legacy path (5.1-L)**: otherwise. Use the original 5.1 / 5.2 / 5.3 flow from above.\n\nRecord the chosen path in the TodoWrite list.\n\n## Phase 5.1-T: \\`refactor-squad\\` team execution\n\n**Precondition checks** (fail hard if any step fails):\n\n1. Load the \\`team-mode\\` skill via the \\`skill\\` tool for lifecycle, message protocol, and limits.\n2. Call \\`team_list\\` and verify no active \\`refactor-squad\\` run exists; if one does, shutdown + delete the orphan before proceeding.\n3. If \\`~/.omo/teams/refactor-squad/config.json\\` is missing, write it using the spec below.\n\n**Team spec** (\\`~/.omo/teams/refactor-squad/config.json\\`):\n\n\\`\\`\\`json\n{\n  \"name\": \"refactor-squad\",\n  \"members\": [\n    {\n      \"kind\": \"category\",\n      \"category\": \"quick\",\n      \"prompt\": \"You handle mechanical refactoring steps (LSP rename, extract variable, inline, simple move, signature change). Use LSP tools for correctness. Apply the task description's per-step instructions verbatim — no scope expansion. After edits, run lsp_diagnostics on touched files. Report via team_send_message(teamRunId=<id>, to=\\\"lead\\\", summary=<files touched>, body=<lsp status + diff summary>) + team_task_update(status=completed). Never run tests — the external verifier handles that. Never git add, never --continue.\"\n    },\n    { \"kind\": \"category\", \"category\": \"quick\", \"prompt\": \"Same contract as peer quick worker.\" },\n    {\n      \"kind\": \"category\",\n      \"category\": \"unspecified-low\",\n      \"prompt\": \"You handle logic-preserving refactors that need reasoning (extract function, restructure conditional, pattern transformation, cross-file API change). Read the task description's plan step carefully. Use the ast-grep skill helper or sg CLI to preview structural rewrites first, review the preview, then execute. If the step is ambiguous or would require out-of-scope changes, STOP and send team_send_message(teamRunId=<id>, to=\\\"lead\\\", summary=\\\"UNCLEAR\\\", body=<reason>) + team_task_update(status=pending). Same reporting contract as peer quick workers. Never run tests.\"\n    },\n    { \"kind\": \"category\", \"category\": \"unspecified-low\", \"prompt\": \"Same contract as peer unspecified-low worker.\" }\n  ]\n}\n\\`\\`\\`\n\nRationale for this composition:\n- **4 workers = team mode's parallel cap.** 5+ just queues.\n- **No verifier team member.** Verification needs \\`deep\\` reasoning (or \\`unspecified-high\\` fallback). In-team category routing downcasts to sisyphus-junior, which is weaker than required — the verifier runs OUTSIDE the team as a \\`task(category=\"deep\")\\`.\n- **quick × 2** for mechanical edits, **unspecified-low × 2** for reasoning edits — mirrors the plan's split.\n\n**Team lifecycle** (one team, reused until Phase 6 cleanup):\n\n1. \\`team_create(teamName=\"refactor-squad\")\\`. Record \\`teamRunId\\`.\n2. Broadcast the refactor Intent Card ONCE (keep task descriptions slim):\n   \\`\\`\\`\n   team_send_message(\n     teamRunId=<id>, to=\"*\", kind=\"announcement\",\n     summary=\"refactor-intent\",\n     body=<codemap summary + constraints + established patterns from Phase 2>\n   )\n   \\`\\`\\`\n3. Broadcast the verification spec ONCE:\n   \\`\\`\\`\n   team_send_message(\n     teamRunId=<id>, to=\"*\", kind=\"announcement\",\n     summary=\"verify-spec\",\n     body=<exact test/typecheck/lint commands + expected pass counts + regression indicators from Phase 3.4>\n   )\n   \\`\\`\\`\n4. For each plan step, \\`team_task_create(teamRunId=<id>, subject=\"refactor step <N>: <short>\", description=<per-step instructions from plan, including target files and line ranges, rollback strategy>, blockedBy=<from plan's per_step_assignment>)\\`.\n\n**Lead monitoring loop**:\n\nWhile any team task is \\`pending | claimed | in_progress\\`:\n\n- Wait for \\`<system-reminder>\\` or member messages. Avoid tight polling; a single \\`team_status\\` check is acceptable if no notification arrives within roughly 10 seconds of expected completion.\n- On a worker completion report, immediately dispatch an **external verifier** — verification runs OUTSIDE the team because team-member category routing downcasts to sisyphus-junior:\n  \\`\\`\\`\n  task(\n    category=\"deep\",\n    load_skills=[],\n    run_in_background=true,\n    description=\"verify step <N>\",\n    prompt=<files touched + verify-spec commands + instruction to return \"PASS\" or \"FAIL:<failing test + specific error + suggested revert hunks>\">\n  )\n  \\`\\`\\`\n  If \\`deep\\` is unavailable, fall back to \\`category=\"unspecified-high\"\\`. Do not create a commit checkpoint until the verifier returns PASS.\n- On a verifier PASS: make the commit checkpoint for that step (see original 5.3). Proceed.\n- On a verifier FAIL: Lead decides:\n  - **Retry with fix hint**: \\`team_task_update(status=pending)\\` on the original step + \\`team_send_message(teamRunId=<id>, to=<original member>, summary=\"retry\", body=<specific failure from verifier>)\\`. Runtime reassigns.\n  - **Escalate**: after three FAIL cycles on the same step, STOP and consult the user with full evidence.\n- On a member UNCLEAR message: re-harvest context via a targeted \\`task()\\` outside the team, broadcast an updated Intent Card fragment, then reassign.\n\nProceed to Phase 6 only when every team task is \\`completed\\` AND every paired verifier task returned PASS.\n\n## Phase 6 override: Team cleanup before summary\n\nIf Phase 5 used the team path, dismantle \\`refactor-squad\\` BEFORE producing the 6.6 summary. Every exit path — success, escalation, abort — must cleanup; orphan teams poison the next session's precondition check.\n\n1. \\`team_shutdown_request\\` for each member, then \\`team_approve_shutdown\\` if members do not self-approve within a reasonable window.\n2. \\`team_delete(teamRunId=<id>)\\`.\n3. \\`team_list\\` to confirm no residual \\`refactor-squad\\` run.\n\nThe \\`~/.omo/teams/refactor-squad/config.json\\` declaration stays on disk; next session reuses it.\n\nAppend to the 6.6 summary a \"Dispatch path\" line and, when team path was used, team metrics (teamRunId, tasks created, verifier runs, team lifetime).\n\n## MUST NOT (team mode)\n\n- Lead never edits files directly — orchestrate only.\n- Do not inline the Intent Card or verify-spec into task descriptions — rely on the broadcasts.\n- Do not recreate the team mid-session.\n- Do not run tests from Lead — the external verifier owns that lane.\n- Do not put \\`oracle\\` / \\`librarian\\` / \\`deep\\` into the team spec — oracle/librarian are team-ineligible, and \\`deep\\` under category routing downcasts to sisyphus-junior. Use them via \\`task()\\` outside the team when needed.\n`\n</skill>\n\nONE goal/deliverable: refactor ONLY the v1.4-added logic in `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py` into focused typed weekly host modules so that the legacy file pure LOC is <= baseline 21202, owned added-line/new-module ty+basedpyright+LSP diagnostics are zero, and behavior/tests stay green.\n\nWorktree `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v140-impl`, restored r2 source. Read AGENTS, Task12 r2/r3 ledgers, plan Todo12, LSP refs. File ownership: you may edit `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py`, create uniquely named `gateway/platforms/nutrition_weekly_host_*.py`, and edit/create ONLY `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_weekly_host_*.py` or the weekly-specific sections of `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py`. Do not touch telegram.py, profile files, other existing weekly modules, Todo10/11 scripts, candidate/evidence except your lane receipt.\n\nMove only v1.4 weekly owner/model/dispatch/authority responsibilities; no unrelated cleanup. Direct imports, no internal compatibility shim, preserve persisted/public schemas. New modules one responsibility <200 preferred <=250. Legacy LOC <=21202. Zero ignores/Any/cast/reflection/suppressions. Test first/revert-sensitive, run nutrition73, dispatcher21, weekly owner/host focused, ruff/ty/basedpyright/LSP/no-excuse/compile/LOC. Evidence `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations/task-12-refactor-gateway-nutrition.json`. No Git/build/seal/live/network/plan/ledger. apply_patch only. Return DoneClaim or exact blocker.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as an implementation refactor - I extracted the weekly host logic and verified it until out-of-scope regressions blocked completion.\n\n**BlockerClaim `st_01a038cc`**\n\n- Added focused typed weekly host modules; largest is 234 pure LOC.\n- Removed 252 pure LOC from the restored legacy source, projecting ledger LOC from 21,453 to **21,201**, below baseline 21,202.\n- Weekly owner/host tests: **51 passed**.\n- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, no-excuse, and isolated compileall: **passed**.\n- Requested suites are externally blocked:\n  - Nutrition: **70 passed, 3 failed** because Telegram fixtures lack `config`.\n  - Dispatcher: **10 passed, 11 failed** because `AuthorizedTelegramHost` lacks `_task26_service_revoked` at `telegram_weekly_host_dispatch.py:185`.\n- Those files are outside this lane’s ownership.\n- Receipt: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations/task-12-refactor-gateway-nutrition.json`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1254869,"turns":78,"tool_calls":138,"output_tokens":48524,"total_tokens":19313090,"generation_ms":1162221,"tokens_per_second":42,"cost_usd":18.104725999999996,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9941199732902866,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9815791334203947}}