{"task_id":"st_01a04823","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T11:30:59.879Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.043Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"st_01a04823","task_summary":"Implement valid weekly startup authority migration","description":"Weekly authority migration fix","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: implement one production-safe, test-first fix in `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined` so the NutriCoach v1.5 migration creates the complete canonical weekly reminder authority and config required by the real TelegramAdapter startup, instead of the current incomplete boolean receipt. Deliverable: verified source changes plus deterministic tests. Must do: 1) Read the V12 committed startup traceback lineage and inspect `scripts/nutricoach_v150_runtime_ops.py`, `scripts/nutricoach_v150_host_operations.py`, `scripts/nutricoach_v140_authority_fixture.py`, weekly config/receipt/registry-identity/bootstrap modules. 2) Form at least three hypotheses and confirm root cause. 3) Write a failing regression that builds a disposable realistic registry, applies migration, and successfully opens/closes `load_registered_weekly_reminder_customers` or constructs TelegramAdapter with zero provider calls; also prove archive/tamper and owner/customer binding denial. 4) Implement the smallest production authority builder: exact post-write registry identity, full weekly config schedule/review/profile/registry/authority paths, canonical authority root and per-enabled-customer registration, valid operator receipt bound to candidate/config/customer owner+consent and a sealed fixed validity window. Do not weaken startup checks or disable weekly operations. 5) Preserve capacity=5 and Channel Inbox OFF. 6) Cleanly close resources, strict types, no secrets in tests/output, <=250 LOC modules. 7) Run targeted tests, all `test_nutricoach_v150*.py`, Ruff, basedpyright, ty, no-excuse, LSP. Forbidden: live profile/service/network/provider/Telegram/customer mutation, commits, push, editing plan/ledger/evidence, changing V12 sealed artifacts. Return exact files, RED/GREEN evidence, commands, and any remaining blocker. Stop when the real startup constructor passes on a disposable profile and all strict gates are green.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as a completed production fix report - I’ll summarize the root cause, exact changes, and verification evidence.\n\nImplemented the canonical NutriCoach v1.5 weekly reminder migration authority.\n\n**Root cause confirmed**\n\nThree hypotheses evaluated:\n\n1. Capacity postimage mismatch — excluded; capacity 5 was committed correctly.\n2. Channel Inbox/runtime switching failure — excluded; Inbox remained OFF and V12 recorded zero provider/Telegram events.\n3. Incomplete weekly authority/config — confirmed by V12 rollback receipt and startup contract tracing.\n\nThe migration wrote a boolean receipt, but startup requires exact post-write registry identity, complete schedule/path configuration, canonical sidecar registration, and a receipt bound to candidate, config, owner, customer, consent, and validity window.\n\n**Changed files**\n\n- `scripts/nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` — new canonical authority builder\n- `scripts/nutricoach_v150_host_operations.py`\n- `scripts/nutricoach_v150_runtime_ops.py`\n- `scripts/nutricoach_v140_authority_fixture.py`\n- `tests/nutricoach_v150_transaction_support.py`\n- `tests/test_nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` — new regression suite\n- `tests/test_nutricoach_v150_sealed_controller.py`\n- `tests/test_nutricoach_v150_v3_hardening.py`\n\nThe builder now creates:\n\n- Exact post-capacity-write registry inode/content binding\n- Profile-relative registry and canonical authority paths\n- Complete 20:00 reminder / 23:00 cutoff / Monday schedule\n- Topic-59 operator review route\n- Canonical authority root and customer registration\n- Operator receipt bound to candidate, config, owner, customer, and consent\n- Fixed sealed validity window\n- Capacity 5 with Channel Inbox omitted/OFF\n\n**RED evidence**\n\nInitial regression:\n\n```text\npytest -q tests/test_nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py\n2 failed, 2 passed\nweekly reminder startup config is invalid\n```\n\nThis reproduced the V12 startup lineage.\n\n**GREEN evidence**\n\n```text\n.venv/bin/pytest -q tests/test_nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py\n4 passed in 0.32s\n```\n\nThe test constructs the real `TelegramAdapter`, verifies the registered customer, and closes retained capabilities. It also proves denial for archived/replaced registries and owner/customer rebinding.\n\n```text\n.venv/bin/pytest -q tests/test_nutricoach_v150*.py\n75 passed in 2.31s\n```\n\nStrict gates:\n\n```text\nruff check <8 changed files>\nAll checks passed!\n\nbasedpyright <8 changed files>\n0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes\n\nty check <8 changed files>\nAll checks passed!\n\ncheck-no-excuse-rules.py <8 changed files>\nno violations in 8 file(s)\n```\n\nLSP diagnostics: no findings on all changed files. Every touched module remains below 250 pure LOC.\n\nNo live profile, service, provider, Telegram, customer, V12 sealed artifact, plan, ledger, or evidence mutation occurred. No remaining blocker.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":899477,"turns":88,"tool_calls":184,"output_tokens":31345,"input_tokens":219108,"cache_read_tokens":10690048,"total_tokens":10940501,"generation_ms":795682,"tokens_per_second":39,"cost_usd":7.380913999999996,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9865710135475647,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9799152198391883,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":2,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}