{"task_id":"st_01a0484e","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T12:16:29.609Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.043Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"v13-code-audit","task_summary":"Review weekly authority and controller code quality","description":"Code quality audit","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Review type: CODE QUALITY. Audit the complete current V13 delta in `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined`, especially `scripts/nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py`, host/runtime operations, detached bootstrap/controller V13 bindings, verifier, fixture/support/tests, and neighboring canonical weekly modules. The tree is detached with no Git metadata, so compare current files to the V12 controller source manifest and candidate snapshot where useful. Check correctness, resource cleanup, atomicity, typing, error boundaries, codebase pattern consistency, duplicate logic, 250-LOC ceiling, receipt expiry semantics, multi-customer edge cases, and rollback created-path coverage. Run non-live tests/static checks as needed; no edits, live execution, network, provider, Telegram, commits or push. Return findings ordered by severity and `<verdict>PASS|FAIL</verdict>`; any correctness issue is FAIL.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as an investigation of the disabled-customer weekly-authority failure - I validated the enabled-only flow and identified remaining release and multi-customer defects.\n\n<verdict>FAIL</verdict>\n\n1. **CRITICAL - the correct builder fix is unsealed.**  \n   `scripts/nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` now correctly derives the receipt and registrations from enabled customers only, and `tests/test_nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` adds the needed disabled-history regression. But both differ from the V13 closure manifest. `verify_nutricoach_v150_preseal_v13.py --verify` fails with `BootstrapDenied: closure_drift`. The corrected code cannot be used by the sealed live upgrade until V13 is re-derived, re-sealed, and re-verified.\n\n2. **HIGH - capacity five is incompatible with independently recorded customer consent.**  \n   The receipt schema has one `consent_digest`, and the builder rejects enabled customers whose consent records differ (`weekly_authority:consent_binding`). I reproduced this offline with two enabled valid customers differing only in `recorded_on`. A per-customer consent-digest map is required if the advertised five enabled customers are meant to work independently.\n\n3. **MEDIUM - the two-customer cleanup test no longer tests the claimed branch.**  \n   `tests/gateway/_nutrition_weekly_reminder_support.py` makes `client_002` disabled, yet registers it and places it in `enabled_customer_keys`. `test_second_customer_failure_closes_every_partial_capability` therefore fails at enabled-set validation before opening the second customer; chmodding its events file is irrelevant. Use two enabled fixture customers for the partial-second-capability cleanup case, and retain a separate disabled-customer exclusion test.\n\n4. **LOW - the owner factory accepts surplus registered capabilities.**  \n   `build_weekly_reminder_authority_owner()` checks `receipt_keys <= registered_keys`, rather than exact equality. Production bootstrap currently supplies the exact set, but the factory boundary should enforce equality, and `WeeklyReminderAuthorityOwner` should preserve that invariant.\n\nThe correct root fix does **not** delete or alter the disabled registry row, drafts, or history:\n- build the receipt and sidecar registrations from the enabled projection;\n- bootstrap against the enabled projection;\n- verify retained owner capabilities against the enabled projection.\n\nThose bootstrap and owner projection changes are present. The full raw-registry digest remains in each enabled runtime binding, so edits to disabled historical rows still invalidate retained bindings.\n\nVerification: disabled-history migration test passes; ownership plus weekly-authority focused tests pass (11 tests) with `PYTHONPATH=dualcoach/profile`. Production-file diagnostics are clean. The V13 preseal verifier currently fails due to the unsealed builder/test changes.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1039276,"turns":46,"tool_calls":182,"output_tokens":47126,"input_tokens":348021,"cache_read_tokens":4631040,"total_tokens":5026187,"generation_ms":961186,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":2.1877620000000007,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9339156918854695,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9301030857023042,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":7,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}