{"task_id":"st_01a04850","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T12:16:29.642Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.044Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"v13-context-audit","task_summary":"Mine V3-V12 evidence for missed V13 constraints","description":"Historical context audit","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Review type: CONTEXT AND HISTORY MINING. Independently reconstruct relevant V3-V12 failure lineage from `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined`, the plan/state ledger, `/home/cube/.hermes/migrations/nutricoach-v1.5.0-combined`, and frozen V13 artifacts. Check whether V13 preserved every learned constraint: isolated net/dev/tmp/user bus, hardlink-safe protected inventory, symlink-safe cleanup, volatile logs/lifecycle/runtime-state classification, immutable consumed authorities, rollback receipts, exact wheel identity, startup constructor, and no live side effects. Compare evidence hashes and source closure; no edits or live execution. Identify any missing historical directive or evidence gap. Return `<verdict>PASS|FAIL</verdict>`, context matrix, exact references/hashes, and blockers.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as confirming the disabled-draft contract and widening the audit to adjacent authority semantics - the product contract is unambiguous, and V13 plus the frozen candidate violate it in multiple layers.\n\n<verdict>FAIL</verdict>\n\n## Confirmed product contract\n\nThe registry contains:\n\n- 2 total customers\n- 1 enabled customer\n- 1 disabled draft with consent not granted and no data root\n- Registry SHA-256: `bd61ed95f80737ba8013db262fd0242a600e540f43f6627f5b9708a599660b29`\n\nDisabled drafts are legitimate persistent registry members:\n\n- Feature brief lines 71-90: capacity limits **enabled** customers; disabled drafts remain allowed and activation requires separate consent/onboarding/review.\n- `RegistryDocument.validate_pilot_customer_boundary()`, lines 1049-1052: disabled entries remain parseable and do not count toward capacity.\n- `customer_admin._register_customer_locked()`, lines 670-713: onboarding deliberately appends a disabled draft.\n- Existing tests:\n  - `test_registry_loads_one_enabled_customer_with_disabled_history`\n  - `test_register_customer_allows_multiple_disabled_drafts`\n  - `test_disabling_latest_customer_preserves_other_customer_receipt`\n\nRelevant source hashes:\n\n- Feature brief: `005295dd0af03b598a481259a1ef231916d01b4dfb8c980f60c24d525b51da2a`\n- `customer_coaching.py`: `1a75a6b6f6063fd12b991dda09cd20e6c7d452227525666bc986787ef9be2f51`\n- `customer_admin.py`: `dd9a1e957ef92e4948043f49e6b038e9498311173345721d53665c92cd4bdde0`\n\nCorrect weekly semantics are therefore:\n\n1. Preserve and identity-bind every registry row.\n2. Derive `enabled_customer_keys` exclusively from `spec.enabled`.\n3. Register/open weekly capabilities only for those enabled keys.\n4. Never require consent, authority sidecars, or existing data roots from disabled drafts.\n5. Enabling a draft changes registry identity and requires a fresh customer activation and weekly authority.\n\n## Three independent disabled-draft failures\n\n### 1. Migration builder rejects the valid registry\n\n`scripts/nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py:133-141`:\n\n```python\nenabled = tuple(... if runtime.spec.enabled)\ncustomer_keys = tuple(...)\nif len(customer_keys) != len(registry.customers):\n    raise HostError(\"weekly_authority:disabled_customer_startup_contract\")\n```\n\nThis directly rejects the live 2-total/1-enabled state.\n\n### 2. Frozen candidate startup bootstrap also rejects it\n\nThe exact candidate wheel contains:\n\n```python\nby_key = {runtime.spec.customer_key: runtime for runtime in registry.customers}\nif set(by_key) != set(enabled_customer_keys):\n    raise WeeklyReminderStartupAuthorityIncident(...)\n```\n\nReference:\n\n- `gateway/platforms/nutrition_weekly_reminder_bootstrap_customers.py:94-98`\n- Frozen wheel member SHA: `59e51e8af24ec382d93082150cf7b8f400327d7ef6c9ffaa91d2ecf8794cf7ad`\n\nTherefore removing only the migration-builder guard would not repair startup.\n\n### 3. Frozen candidate owner verification rejects it again\n\nThe exact wheel’s `WeeklyReminderAuthorityOwner.verify_registry()` builds `current` from **all** registry customers and requires equality with the enabled capability map.\n\n- Frozen wheel member SHA: `e40ce28b674a4b36d501043a912adc8efda7dd8d0014126230aa639b973d4ddc`\n- Candidate snapshot contains the same bytes.\n\nCurrent working source appears partially repaired to filter `if item.spec.enabled`, but that source is not in the frozen wheel. The candidate wheel remains defective.\n\n## Consequence\n\nThis cannot be repaired by resealing only the V13 migration controller. The installed candidate itself must change, requiring:\n\n- rebuilt Hermes wheel;\n- new wheel SHA and RECORD identity;\n- new full-product candidate digest;\n- renewed qualification;\n- new controller/source closure;\n- fresh preflight snapshots, rehearsal, audit, package digest, and authorization.\n\n## Other missed constraints\n\n### A. Frozen V13 closure is already stale\n\nAt inspection time, two declared controller-source hashes differ:\n\n| Path | Frozen expected | Current |\n|---|---|---|\n| `scripts/nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` | `f2cd4f9fadfa655b0083ce7ced10c527834adff9df5592c30a530691f579f78d` | `d2b9f5fcfb09d7774303c64b0c705e8c652e50e78d63f834a5473d93b0fcd379` |\n| `tests/test_nutricoach_v150_weekly_authority.py` | `996706f115427ce38eca5bc023ba9b5eb8507a2523cfc24e5ba37cb8f5e451b1` | `dbd66034b758cecb03f958f565173041ca07f1dba2efed3c5eeb07508e041ada` |\n\nThe detached bootstrap would now deny this preseal before mutation.\n\n### B. The new disabled-draft regression is not live-shaped enough\n\nThe current unfrozen test clones the enabled customer and changes only `enabled=False`. The actual disabled draft has:\n\n- `consent_granted=False`\n- no data root\n\nThe regression must prove that startup never opens, consent-checks, registers, or requires storage for such a draft.\n\n### C. One consent digest cannot represent capacity-five customers generally\n\n`WeeklyOperationsAuthorityReceipt` carries one `consent_digest`, and builder/startup require every enabled customer to match it. Consent includes each customer’s independent `recorded_on` value.\n\nNothing in the product contract requires multiple customers to have identical consent dates. Capacity-five weekly authority therefore needs either per-customer consent bindings or separate per-customer receipts.\n\nThis is latent for the current one-enabled state but incompatible with the qualified multi-customer contract.\n\n### D. Authority expiry is not fenced before reservation\n\nV13 hard-codes:\n\n- issued: `2026-08-27T00:00:00+09:00`\n- expires: `2026-09-30T23:59:59+09:00`\n\nRuntime ticks enforce expiry, but package inspection, startup construction, and transaction post-fence do not reject an expired receipt before reservation. A delayed execution could commit a service whose weekly authority is immediately inactive.\n\n### E. Exact startup proof remains absent\n\nThe transaction still lacks a post-migration constructor/tick fence through the installed successor interpreter. V13 evidence explicitly records `\"rehearsal_executed\": false`.\n\nA valid successor must prove before commit:\n\n- exact enabled-key projection;\n- disabled rows unchanged;\n- real installed `TelegramAdapter` constructor;\n- weekly owner construction;\n- at least one authorization snapshot at the sealed current time;\n- zero provider/Telegram/customer events.\n\nNo files were edited and no tests, migration, service action, or live transaction were executed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":930133,"turns":23,"tool_calls":143,"output_tokens":35697,"input_tokens":602253,"cache_read_tokens":4344832,"total_tokens":4982782,"generation_ms":907137,"tokens_per_second":39,"cost_usd":8.169231,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9946496815286624,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8782610365498066,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":9,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}