{"task_id":"st_01a048ac","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T13:58:22.973Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.045Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"r5-closure-audit","task_summary":"Audit r5 immutable candidate closure","description":"Audit r5 immutable closure","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only closure integrity audit for NutriCoach V14 r5 candidate 232725f01e3cdfe7acd4a8927bd0ce46d22438d4c424165de6d83c068a41f628 and package fa58fc80a38ca4f4d58db84db9db46ba48b842e2d12b983f4f7eee236cabd147. Inspect candidate, r5 preseal, controller-source copied tree, and source. Verify complete transitive runtime/verifier import closure, preseal/controller-source and wheel mode immutability, hashes, RECORDs, import order, and no mutable worktree execution escape. Do not write or invoke external actions. Return evidence-backed PASS/FAIL.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as a final read-only integrity verdict - the r5 candidate fails closure integrity despite valid hashes and manifests.\n\n# FAIL\n\nPassing evidence:\n\n- Candidate digest recomputes exactly to `232725f01e3cdfe7acd4a8927bd0ce46d22438d4c424165de6d83c068a41f628`.\n- Package payload recomputes exactly to `fa58fc80a38ca4f4d58db84db9db46ba48b842e2d12b983f4f7eee236cabd147`.\n- Candidate inventory: 324 expected/actual files, zero missing, extra, or hash mismatches.\n- Controller-source: 318 manifest/physical files, zero mismatches; all files mode `0444`.\n- Preseal package: 326 entries plus self-excluded manifest, zero hash/mode/inventory errors; all 327 files mode `0444`.\n- Candidate and copied controller-source trees are byte-identical for all 312 source entries.\n- Both build pairs are reproducible. Physical wheels are regular, single-link `0444` files with expected hashes:\n  - Hermes: `7769edae...11825`\n  - Profile: `ca187949...a55b`\n- Wheel RECORDs fully validate, including every member hash and size:\n  - Hermes RECORD: `bec67407...121e`\n  - Profile RECORD: `59f9aa73...6407`\n- Static transitive analysis resolved 101 first-party modules: 17 controller-source, 6 Hermes-wheel, 78 profile-wheel; no missing first-party import.\n\nBlocking failures:\n\n1. **Runtime/verifier closure is not sealed or complete.**  \n   `nutricoach_v150_runtime_ops.py:163-191` creates the successor with `venv --system-site-packages`, then installs only the two wheels using `--no-deps`. The 101-module closure imports unsealed external modules including `pydantic`, `yaml`, `anyio`, and `typing_extensions`. They resolve from `/home/cube/miniconda3/lib/python3.12/site-packages`, outside every RECORD and closure manifest, and are owner-writable mode `0664`. The actual Pydantic is 2.12.5 while the Hermes wheel declares exact `pydantic==2.13.4`.\n\n2. **Mutable worktree verification escape.**  \n   `verify_nutricoach_v150_preseal_v14.py:23-33,210` reads `_BASE_MANIFEST` directly from `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/...`, rather than the frozen candidate/preseal copy. Thus authorization-time verification depends on a mutable worktree surface.\n\n3. **Wheel-first import order is later overridden.**  \n   The detached bootstrap initially constructs `PYTHONPATH` as Hermes wheel, profile wheel, controller-source. However:\n   - `verify_nutricoach_v150_preseal_v14.py:13`\n   - `verify_nutricoach_v150_candidate.py:23`\n   \n   both execute `sys.path.insert(0, controller-source)`. This puts copied source ahead of wheels for subsequent imports, permitting mixed source/wheel resolution and defeating the bootstrap’s stated wheel-first rule.\n\n4. **Additional mutable binding surfaces.**  \n   The permission package and candidate manifest used during verification are owner-writable mode `0664`; `snapshot-before.json` is `0600`. Hash checks are present, but these are not immutable closure members and remain raceable between separate hash/read operations.\n\nNo files were modified and no live, network, service, or authorization action was invoked.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":238616,"turns":12,"tool_calls":42,"output_tokens":10519,"input_tokens":197719,"cache_read_tokens":1239552,"total_tokens":1447790,"generation_ms":227379,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":1.9239410000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9776903370384593,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.862434433033158,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":18,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}