{"task_id":"st_01a048ae","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T13:58:23.007Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.045Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"r5-redteam-audit","task_summary":"Red-team r5 binding and rollback safety","description":"Red-team r5 sealed execution","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Adversarial read-only audit of NutriCoach V14 r5. Search for target/package substitution, hardcoded stale identity, source import escape, service identity or ExecStart weakness, created-file rollback scope expansion, registry drift before reservation, crash recovery holes, and false post-fence success. Scope r5 candidate/preseal/rehearsal and source worktree. Do not modify, invoke authorization, execute live, use network, Telegram, providers, or customer actions. Deliver PASS/FAIL with exploit-quality evidence.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as an adversarial read-only release audit - I inspected evidence and source without edits, live-service actions, or network activity.\n\n## FAIL\n\n### 1. r5 qualification is a proven functional failure\n`task-12-independent-verification-r5/final-qualification.json` marks candidate `cbfc112...` `NOT_CONFIRMED`, blocked on tests.\n\nReproduction evidence is strong:\n- 12/12 independently process-isolated parallel executions failed.\n- Failure: `DisposableScenarioError: approved customer send was not exactly once`.\n- The failing scenario calls the approval/send callback, restarts the adapter, replays the callback, and asserts exactly one customer delivery. The failure occurs before its artifact verifier.\n\nA serial pass does not clear this concurrency failure.\n\n### 2. Candidate/preseal identity chain is broken\nThree different identities are presented without a supersession/binding artifact:\n- r5 failed candidate: `cbfc112...`\n- current V14 candidate and r9 qualification: `e15933...`\n- v1.1 F5 preseal/final seal: `0e3835...`\n\nThe F5 seal is therefore not a seal for the V14 `e159...` candidate, and cannot waive the r5 failure or qualify the current candidate.\n\nThe current worktree is also not a clean Git identity: `HEAD` is `ccd2eee...`, while the release seal records `ae909026...`; relevant V14 modules are untracked relative to `HEAD`. r9's inventory says its 275 sealed source entries align with the current tree, and sampled high-risk files match the `e159...` snapshot, but that is a manifest assertion, not a release-commit identity.\n\n### 3. Profile-package substitution remains possible at the local service/config boundary\n`gateway/platforms/telegram_customer_bootstrap_registration.py` and `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime.py` select:\n\n```python\npackage_root or os.environ.get(\"DUALCOACH_PROFILE_PACKAGE\")\n```\n\n`DualCoachProfilePackage.from_root()` only verifies that the *attacker-selected* absolute directory exists and is not a symlink. `resolve()` then accepts a module whenever its source lies beneath that same selected directory. It never binds the package to:\n\n```text\n<profile_root>/workspace/checkin_cli\n```\n\nor to a candidate digest, signed inventory, owner, or immutable file identity.\n\nExploit path:\n1. A local actor able to set the gateway process environment or explicit `package_root` provides `/tmp/p`.\n2. They place `/tmp/p/checkin_cli/customer_admin.py` and `customer_coaching.py`.\n3. `TelegramCustomerBootstrapRegistration` imports and executes those modules, then invokes their `_read`, lock, registry-path, and registration functions under the gateway identity.\n4. The resolver's origin check passes because the malicious module is inside `/tmp/p/checkin_cli`.\n\nThe exact resolver, registration, and onboarding-runtime bytes match the current source and the `e159...` candidate snapshot. The source-worktree-only activation path repeats the flaw and is weaker: it resolves the configured root before validation, accepting a symlinked configured root.\n\nThis is not a remote Telegram-only exploit; it requires local process-environment/config authority. It is nevertheless a seal-bypass at the configured-profile boundary.\n\n## Controls that held under static review\n- Canonical registration binds customer, canonical pins, authority marker, registry digest, inode, owner, mode, and link count; it uses `O_NOFOLLOW`, locked retained descriptors, double reads, and fsync.\n- Registry substitution, replacement, malformed history, interruption, and restart recovery are explicitly fail-closed in the r5/r6 tests.\n- Reminder delivery holds provider admission across final reread, provider call, and terminal write. Interrupted/unknown sends become terminal `unknown`, preventing retry.\n- The provider fence refreshes the live registry and rechecks runtime, route, authority digest, candidate/config/receipt snapshot immediately before dispatch.\n- Generated systemd units run system services as the selected non-root user by default and use an absolute Python executable. No independent ExecStart injection was demonstrated.\n\nCaveat: the direct provider-fence race tests are absent; the r7 race test exercises bootstrap-time registry replacement, not a swap at the final provider boundary.\n\n## Required disposition\nDo not approve the r5/preseal/rehearsal aggregate.\n\nBefore a new seal:\n1. Bind production profile imports to the canonical profile path and sealed package identity; remove the environment override from production entry points or authenticate it.\n2. Repair the exactly-once parallel failure and rerun the full gate under process-isolated parallel execution.\n3. Produce a single signed/hashed supersession chain that explicitly binds the approved candidate digest, source inventory, preseal, rehearsal, and final seal.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":519589,"turns":22,"tool_calls":126,"output_tokens":25655,"input_tokens":424337,"cache_read_tokens":2191360,"total_tokens":2641352,"generation_ms":489164,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":1.5948060000000002,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.958505135098882,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8377728765984745,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":20,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}