{"task_id":"st_01a048e5","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-28T15:03:46.682Z","updated_at":"2026-08-30T13:06:36.045Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"r12-lifecycle-closure-audit","task_summary":"Audit r12 hardened lifecycle closure","description":"r12 lifecycle closure audit","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Perform a read-only final release-quality audit of NutriCoach V14 r12. Deliverable: evidence-backed PASS/FAIL for candidate 5334774ea888af08e98ba1706b4b3fb954741e4042ee57741bc434ffbf220b5c, preseal /home/cube/.hermes/migrations/nutricoach-v1.5.0-combined/live-transaction-preseal-v14-live-representative-r12, and rehearsal /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v14r12-rehearsal. Re-check all prior blockers: exact controller inventory with no undeclared bytecode, -B/PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE execution, sealed protected-inventory digest verified before use, PREPARING/RESERVED/STOPPING terminal recovery without snapshot, candidate and preseal immutability, launcher/bootstrap/controller agreement, registry binding, one-use ledger, and rehearsal terminal phases. Do not modify files or invoke authorization, live execution, network, Telegram, provider, customer, service, commit, or push actions. Stop with exact evidence and PASS/FAIL.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1174611,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only release audit - I traced the sealed execution chain, independently verified integrity, and compared the rehearsal report with its raw terminal state.\n\n# Final verdict: FAIL\n\n- **Candidate `5334774e...220b5c`: FAIL release-quality** — identity and immutability checks pass, but its controller contains the terminal-state defect below.\n- **V14 r12 preseal: FAIL release-quality** — cryptographic/inventory verification passes, but it embeds the defective controller.\n- **V14 r12 rehearsal: FAIL** — its `PASS` report contradicts raw terminal evidence.\n- **Overall release decision: FAIL / DO NOT SEAL OR EXECUTE.**\n\n## Blocking evidence\n\nAll 12 rollback cases end in nonterminal `PREPARING`, not `ROLLED_BACK`:\n\n```text\nterminal_phases:\n1 COMMITTED\n12 PREPARING\n```\n\nAffected paths are every:\n\n```text\ntask-v14r12-rehearsal/rollback-*/execution/phase.json\n```\n\nEach has a consumed `FAILED` ledger, and no reservation remains:\n\n```text\n12 FAILED\n1 SUCCEEDED\nreserved_ledger_count=0\n```\n\nThe cause is deterministic:\n\n1. Rollback correctly writes `ROLLED_BACK` at  \n   `nutricoach_v150_sealed_controller.py:94-130`.\n2. The rehearsal then retries each consumed authorization at  \n   `rehearse_nutricoach_v150_v14.py:237-248`.\n3. `_execute()` writes the recovery manifest and advances to `PREPARING` **before** checking the one-use ledger:\n   - recovery manifest: controller line 169\n   - `PREPARING`: line 171\n   - reservation/replay rejection: lines 172-176\n4. Replay is denied, but the terminal journal has already been overwritten.\n5. The rehearsal never asserts terminal phase before declaring `PASS` at lines 249 and 259-274.\n\nRaw report SHA-256:\n\n```text\nb9880f792561a4216d2542327a4d0f12c777fdb2ef73ac370db62382a46d3a39\n```\n\nIts claimed `PASS:13` is therefore a false positive.\n\n## Prior-blocker matrix\n\n| Check | Result | Evidence |\n|---|---|---|\n| Exact controller inventory | PASS | 318 declared/actual; 0 missing, undeclared, or hash mismatches |\n| Complete preseal package inventory | PASS | 326 declared/actual excluding manifest; 0 mismatches |\n| Undeclared bytecode | PASS | 0 `.pyc`/`.pyo`; post-verification count remained 0 |\n| `-B` / `PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE` | PASS | Bootstrap lines 162 and 167-176 set both before importing worker/controller |\n| Protected-inventory digest | PASS | Bound and actual: `d2c084be0865f8e9844452a7b683f97800e31af9bc7e1a113241109a283aada5`; checked before `protected_paths()` use at concrete-host lines 201-219 |\n| PREPARING/RESERVED/STOPPING recovery without snapshot | PASS in code | Controller lines 209-224 exclude all three phases from snapshot loading; rollback lines 94-130 restore service and write `ROLLED_BACK` |\n| Candidate/preseal bytes | PASS | All 324 candidate and 327 preseal regular files mode `0444`; no symlinks or writable files |\n| Candidate immutability during audit | PASS | Tree digest unchanged: `8bb6752bf8cf70dee448cfc75630dcf250f97737c422ee57029bd0a8ed8b63c4` |\n| Preseal immutability during audit | PASS | Tree digest unchanged: `6b216b85301e7714fcf93e92c39ce99fc2ed6a2ddb17cf7a493ec7a16e53c449` |\n| Launcher/bootstrap/controller binding | PASS | All bind `live-transaction-preseal-v14-live-representative-r12`; sealed target binds candidate and authority roots |\n| Registry binding | PASS | Live and bound registry SHA-256: `bd61ed95f80737ba8013db262fd0242a600e540f43f6627f5b9708a599660b29`; shape digest `bb911adcae1efd5888b853a62925ac2461b7d1978666e0cdfb67f4de52a15be5` |\n| One-use ledger | PASS for denial | `O_EXCL` reservation and consumed check at sealed-authority lines 190-246; all rehearsal attempts consumed |\n| Rehearsal terminal phases | **FAIL** | 12 rollback cases finish `PREPARING` |\n\n## Independent read-only verifier\n\nExecuted with `/home/cube/miniconda3/bin/python3.12 -B` and `PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1`; exit `0`:\n\n```text\ncandidate_digest=5334774ea888af08e98ba1706b4b3fb954741e4042ee57741bc434ffbf220b5c\npackage_digest=88865623d3acae067b1e32b38ddd83a06fc1ccec7bcaca3e2def0cd4a1bb82fc\npackage_sha256=cc2974ec006ae4cfc26ebcea519a1fab6513850136dca9773ff844a0fa4e66de\nclosure_digest=sha256:4a5ff142410b50aa3c057d758fe6c550c0bda4f1573921959c8f13dd05af6a83\nstatus=V14_LIVE_REPRESENTATIVE_PRESEAL_VERIFIED\n```\n\nThis verifier does not inspect rehearsal terminal phases, so its success does not clear the blocker.\n\n## Correction designs\n\n1. **Recommended: atomic reservation before execution-state writes.** Reserve globally first, immediately enter the consume-on-failure boundary, then write the recovery manifest and `PREPARING`. Add ledger-only recovery for crashes before a phase exists. Lowest migration cost and prevents rejected replay from touching a terminal journal.\n2. **Append-only per-attempt journals.** Bind an immutable attempt ID into the global reservation and never reuse an execution root. Stronger forensic isolation, but significantly more state-machine and migration complexity.\n\nThe first design is sufficient. It must be accompanied by assertions that every rollback remains `ROLLED_BACK` both before and after a rejected replay.\n\nNo files were modified, and no authorization, live execution, service, network, Telegram, provider, customer, commit, or push action was invoked.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":449171,"turns":14,"tool_calls":84,"output_tokens":20061,"input_tokens":317132,"cache_read_tokens":2635264,"total_tokens":2972457,"generation_ms":431948,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":4.728689,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9935930567068116,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8925848700513075,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":23,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}