{"task_id":"st_01a04d8e","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"01a04ad7-eaa9-790c-83f7-57410e6370d1","root_session_id":"01a04ad7-eaa9-790c-83f7-57410e6370d1","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-29T12:44:19.582Z","updated_at":"2026-08-29T15:18:51.150Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"authority-live-gap-audit","task_summary":"Audit why rehearsal missed live authority failure","description":"authority-live-gap-audit","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Audit why r20 13-case rehearsal and independent audits passed while the live Telegram adapter rejected the candidate. DELIVERABLE: exact missing surface, false assumptions, and required real-surface QA for a fresh successor before authorization. SCOPE: read-only worktree, r20 preseal/rehearsal/evidence, live rollback evidence; no service/provider/network/customer actions. VERIFY: cite artifacts and commands safe to run in disposable clones. STOP WHEN: a decisive PASS-gate checklist prevents recurrence.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as an investigation - I traced r20's sealed controller, rehearsal, live authority chain, and rollback evidence without making changes.\n\n## Decisive finding\n\nThe rejection was local and pre-network, not a Telegram provider failure.\n\nr20 changed `task26-candidate-digest` to `3dab...5090`, but preserved a `task26-authority-pin.json` that pointed to the external authority chain whose current candidate remained the predecessor `6c9c...6a92`.\n\nThe adapter loads that pin during `connect()`, then rejects unless the external chain's `current_qualified_candidate` equals the credential candidate. The exact guard is in:\n\n- `gateway/platforms/task26_runtime_authority.py:104-149` - reads paired `candidate-authority/registry.json` and `qualification-ledger.json`; rejects with `runtime candidate is not current or was revoked`.\n- `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:2918-2958` - loads that authority before network connection and fails activation on any exception.\n\nRead-only inspection of the pinned real authority showed:\n\n- `current_qualified_candidate`: `6c9c...6a92` (the predecessor)\n- r20 digest appears in events: `false`\n- r20 digest is current: `false`\n- r20 digest is invalidated: `false`\n\nSo the missing surface was **not merely a credential**. It was the complete external, append-only current-authority publication:\n\n1. a paired `qualify` event/ledger row for the fresh candidate,\n2. a matching authority pin with the new registry head, ledger head, and event count,\n3. systemd credentials that reference that new pin and the same candidate digest.\n\n`switch_postimages()` explicitly rewrote only `candidate-digest` and `task26-candidate-digest`; every other credential, including `task26-authority-pin.json`, was copied unchanged. See `scripts/nutricoach_v150_host_operations.py:127-143`.\n\n## Why the passes were not contradictory\n\n- The 13-case rehearsal was explicitly `loopback-only` and passed a `DisposableService`, not the live adapter against its external authority chain:\n  - `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v14r20-rehearsal/report.json`\n  - `scripts/nutricoach_v150_sealed_target.py:43-74`\n  - The rehearsal contains zero `candidate-authority` files; it only has copied runtime credentials.\n\n- The sealed target authorized no external or Telegram customer events, and channel inbox was disabled:\n  - `sealed-target.json` has `channel_inbox_authorized: false`, `external_events_authorized: 0`, `provider_events_authorized: 0`, and `telegram_customer_events_authorized: 0`.\n\n- The independent audit was a pre-live closure audit, not a live-authority PASS gate. Its own output records:\n  - `live_authorization_root_absent: true`\n  - `live_execution_root_absent: true`\n  - `live_successor_root_absent: true`\n  - `authorization_state: AWAITING_FRESH_OWNER_INSTRUCTION`\n  - Source: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v14r20-independent-audits.json`\n\n- r20's candidate qualification also said `QUALIFIED_PENDING_LIVE_AUTHORIZATION`, not deployable.\n\nThe live run proves the gap: r20 reached `COMMITTED` with the successor service running, then manual adapter QA rejected authority and rollback restored the predecessor. No provider or customer event occurred.\n\n- `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v14r20-live-outcome.json`\n- `/home/cube/.hermes/migrations/.../nutricoach-v150-v14-live-representative-59-3dab1a55/postcommit-rollback-receipt.json`\n\n## False assumptions to remove\n\n1. **\"Rebinding the candidate credential makes it current.\"**  \n   False. Currentness is determined only by the external paired authority chain and its pin.\n\n2. **\"A loopback/service-state rehearsal exercises Telegram adapter startup.\"**  \n   False. The rehearsal tested controller stages and a filesystem service state machine, not `TelegramPlatform.connect()` against the pinned authority root.\n\n3. **\"Independent audit PASS is authorization to consume the live one-use ledger.\"**  \n   False. The audit explicitly excluded all live roots.\n\n4. **\"The immutable source closure covered the authority behavior.\"**  \n   False. r20's wheel contains `task26_candidate_authority.py` and `task26_runtime_authority.py`, but both are absent from its `source_inventory` and frozen `controller-source`. The source audit therefore could not independently inspect the code that rejected r20.\n\n5. **\"A postcommit manual adapter check is an acceptable first authority check.\"**  \n   False. It consumed r20's one-use ledger before finding the missing authority publication.\n\n## Fresh-successor PASS gate\n\nDo not authorize a successor unless every item is evidenced before ledger consumption:\n\n- [ ] New digest and new one-use authorization. r20 is consumed (`CONSUMED/SUCCEEDED`) and must never be replayed.\n- [ ] Full wheel-to-source closure: every executable wheel module, especially both Task26 authority modules, has a sealed source path and hash.\n- [ ] A new external authority root exists outside profile, package, wheelhouse, candidate, and registry roots; it has required private ownership/modes.\n- [ ] Its paired registry/ledger chains validate; the successor has an appended `qualify` entry and is the sole `current_qualified_candidate`.\n- [ ] The new authority pin matches that root's source ID, genesis, registry head, ledger head, and event count.\n- [ ] Installed successor credentials prove the same candidate digest in `task26-candidate-digest` and the new pin in `task26-authority-pin.json`.\n- [ ] An offline, disposable **installed-wheel + real credential-surface** test invokes the actual authority loader and adapter activation path: it must accept the successor and reject a stale, missing, revoked, or pin-stale candidate. No `DisposableService`, direct field injection, or mocked authority source qualifies.\n- [ ] Only if channel inbox is enabled: a separately authorized test-bot probe runs the adapter's actual three read-only Bot API checks (`getMe`, direct-message `getChat`, parent-channel `getChatMember`) and records exact bot, parent, privilege, and candidate bindings. Permit zero customer updates/messages.\n- [ ] The controller performs the authority-loader check **before** marking the one-use ledger `SUCCEEDED`; failure leaves the ledger unconsumed and the predecessor untouched.\n\n## Safe disposable-clone checks\n\nThe recorded regression command is safe but insufficient; it tests controller behavior only:\n\n```bash\nPYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTHONPATH='dualcoach/profile:.' \\\nuv run pytest -q \\\n  tests/test_nutricoach_v150_v14_safety.py \\\n  tests/test_nutricoach_v150_live_binding.py\n```\n\nAlso safe, but mock-only, are:\n\n```bash\nPYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 uv run pytest -q \\\n  tests/gateway/test_telegram_channel_inbox_adapter.py \\\n  tests/gateway/test_multi_customer_candidate_authority.py\n```\n\nThe successor must add and pass the credential-surface authority test described above; neither existing command can authorize deployment.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":357107,"turns":11,"tool_calls":60,"output_tokens":17738,"input_tokens":247503,"cache_read_tokens":1282048,"total_tokens":1547289,"generation_ms":338944,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":0.9642716000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9721932754764543,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8381858466961873,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":2,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}