{"task_id":"st_01a052fb","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-30T14:02:50.745Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T01:50:25.203Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"v15-r33-authority-audit","task_summary":"Audit r28-to-r33 authority, capacity, weekly rotation rollback","description":"Audit r33 upgrade safety","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Independently audit r33 authority/rollback safety read-only. DELIVERABLE: unconditional verdict and blocker_count. Verify current r28 baseline, candidate-policy rebind preserving capacity 5, candidate-specific weekly authority root preserving r28 root, recovery manifest path binding, external Task26 promotion/compensation, one-use roots absent, and 13-case rehearsal report /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v15r33-rehearsal/report.json. No mutation.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as the final r33 read-only safety verdict - I audited the live baseline, sealed implementation, and rehearsal evidence without mutation.\n\n**Verdict: FAIL**  \n**blocker_count: 1**\n\nBlocker:\n\n- `load_recovery_manifest()` trusts persisted absolute paths without binding them to the sealed target. In particular, `weekly_authority`, `created_files`, `created_directories`, `preflight`, and the external authority root are accepted directly. A corrupted/replaced recovery manifest could make rollback delete the r28 weekly root or compensate an unintended Task26 authority root. No adversarial path-binding test covers this.\n\nVerified passing:\n\n- Live r28 baseline is active/running, candidate `1128e376...`, capacity 5, canonical weekly root present, Task26 authority at 18 events.\n- r33 rebinds the admission policy to candidate `0bf4f724...` while preserving capacity 5.\n- r33 normally selects `data/weekly-operations-authority-0bf4f7247ae8a19e`, preserving the r28 canonical root.\n- External Task26 promotion and predecessor compensation are implemented and tested.\n- r33 authorization and execution one-use roots are absent.\n- Sealed package inventory, immutability, package digest, candidate binding, and live registry binding pass.\n- Rehearsal report exists and records `13/13 PASS`, zero external events, and unchanged live source.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":147803,"turns":9,"tool_calls":42,"output_tokens":6577,"input_tokens":121019,"cache_read_tokens":568832,"total_tokens":696428,"generation_ms":138693,"tokens_per_second":47,"cost_usd":1.086821,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9691048968127977,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8245722627060046,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":2,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}