{"task_id":"st_01a0534a","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-30T15:30:14.981Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T08:22:08.681Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"nutrition-ux-audit","task_summary":"Audit customer onboarding and check-in UX friction","description":"Audit Telegram questionnaire UX","category":"visual-engineering","requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","display":"ClinePass Qwen3.8 Max","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"high"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Audit the Telegram customer UX for post-consent nutrition onboarding and daily nutrition check-in in /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined. Read the actual customer-visible copy and flow only. Deliver: (1) severity-ranked friction points, (2) concrete Korean replacement copy, (3) recommended input/button simplifications that preserve data contracts and safety. Do not edit files. Stop when every onboarding question and daily check-in step has been reviewed. Return file/line evidence.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on VISUAL/UI tasks.\n\n<DESIGN_SYSTEM_WORKFLOW_MANDATE>\n## YOU ARE A VISUAL ENGINEER. FOLLOW THIS WORKFLOW OR YOUR OUTPUT IS REJECTED.\n\n**YOUR FAILURE MODE**: You skip design system analysis and jump straight to writing components with hardcoded colors, arbitrary spacing, and ad-hoc font sizes. The result is INCONSISTENT GARBAGE that looks like 5 different people built it. THIS STOPS NOW.\n\n**EVERY visual task follows this EXACT workflow. VIOLATION = BROKEN OUTPUT.**\n\n### PHASE 1: ANALYZE THE DESIGN SYSTEM (MANDATORY FIRST ACTION)\n\n**BEFORE writing a SINGLE line of CSS, HTML, JSX, Svelte, or component code - you MUST:**\n\n1. **SEARCH for the design system.** Use Grep, Glob, Read - actually LOOK:\n   - Design tokens: colors, spacing, typography, shadows, border-radii\n   - Theme files: CSS variables, Tailwind config, `theme.ts`, styled-components theme, design tokens file\n   - Shared/base components: Button, Card, Input, Layout primitives\n   - Existing UI patterns: How are pages structured? What spacing grid? What color usage?\n\n2. **READ at minimum 5-10 existing UI components.** Understand:\n   - Naming conventions (BEM? Atomic? Utility-first? Component-scoped?)\n   - Spacing system (4px grid? 8px? Tailwind scale? CSS variables?)\n   - Color usage (semantic tokens? Direct hex? Theme references?)\n   - Typography scale (heading levels, body, caption - how many? What font stack?)\n   - Component composition patterns (slots? children? compound components?)\n\n**DO NOT proceed to Phase 2 until you can answer ALL of these. If you cannot, you have not explored enough. EXPLORE MORE.**\n\n### PHASE 2: NO DESIGN SYSTEM? BUILD ONE. NOW.\n\nIf Phase 1 reveals NO coherent design system (or scattered, inconsistent patterns):\n\n1. **STOP. Do NOT build the requested UI yet.**\n2. **Extract what exists** - even inconsistent patterns have salvageable decisions.\n3. **Create a minimal design system FIRST:**\n   - Color palette: primary, secondary, neutral, semantic (success/warning/error/info)\n   - Typography scale: heading levels (h1-h4 minimum), body, small, caption\n   - Spacing scale: consistent increments (4px or 8px base)\n   - Border radii, shadows, transitions - systematic, not random\n   - Component primitives: the reusable building blocks\n4. **Commit/save the design system, THEN proceed to Phase 3.**\n\nA design system is NOT optional overhead. It is the FOUNDATION. Building UI without one is like building a house on sand. It WILL collapse into inconsistency.\n\n### PHASE 3: BUILD WITH THE SYSTEM. NEVER AROUND IT.\n\n**NOW and ONLY NOW** - implement the requested visual work:\n\n| Element | CORRECT | WRONG (WILL BE REJECTED) |\n|---------|---------|--------------------------|\n| Color | Design token / CSS variable | Hardcoded `#3b82f6`, `rgb(59,130,246)` |\n| Spacing | System value (`space-4`, `gap-md`, `var(--spacing-4)`) | Arbitrary `margin: 13px`, `padding: 7px` |\n| Typography | Scale value (`text-lg`, `heading-2`, token) | Ad-hoc `font-size: 17px` |\n| Component | Extend/compose from existing primitives | One-off div soup with inline styles |\n| Border radius | System token | Random `border-radius: 6px` |\n\n**IF the design requires something OUTSIDE the current system:**\n- **Extend the system FIRST** - add the new token/primitive\n- **THEN use the new token** in your component\n- **NEVER one-off override.** That is how design systems die.\n\n### PHASE 4: VERIFY BEFORE CLAIMING DONE\n\nBEFORE reporting visual work as complete, answer these:\n\n- [ ] Does EVERY color reference a design token or CSS variable?\n- [ ] Does EVERY spacing use the system scale?\n- [ ] Does EVERY component follow the existing composition pattern?\n- [ ] Would a designer see CONSISTENCY across old and new components?\n- [ ] Are there ZERO hardcoded magic numbers for visual properties?\n\n**If ANY answer is NO - FIX IT. You are NOT done.**\n\n</DESIGN_SYSTEM_WORKFLOW_MANDATE>\n\n<DESIGN_QUALITY>\nDesign-first mindset (AFTER design system is established):\n- Bold aesthetic choices over safe defaults\n- Unexpected layouts, asymmetry, grid-breaking elements\n- Distinctive typography (avoid: Arial, Inter, Roboto, Space Grotesk)\n- Cohesive color palettes with sharp accents\n- High-impact animations with staggered reveals\n- Atmosphere: gradient meshes, noise textures, layered transparencies\n\nAVOID: Generic fonts, purple gradients on white, predictable layouts, cookie-cutter patterns.\n</DESIGN_QUALITY>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as an audit of the post-consent nutrition onboarding and daily check-in customer UX - I traced all 22 onboarding questions, all 13 daily steps, and the six conditional follow-ups. No files were edited.\n\n## Severity-ranked friction\n\n### P1 — Consent button is misleading\n`내용 확인 후 동의` immediately records consent; it does not open a review step (`nutrition_coaching.py:3563-3579`, `telegram.py:6743-6777`).\n\n**Replacement**\n- `동의하고 영양 온보딩 시작`\n- `동의하지 않기`\n\nAfter consent, the current notice says check-in has not started, then immediately opens onboarding (`nutrition_coaching.py:3640-3647`). Use:\n\n> 동의가 저장됐어요. 이제 영양 온보딩을 시작할게요.  \n> 일일 체크인과 코칭은 운영자 활성화 후 시작됩니다.\n\n### P1 — Onboarding is 22 serial questions with no in-progress edit/back action\nThe contract contains 22 fields (`nutrition_onboarding_contract.py:13-35`), and collection only offers progress text plus typed answers (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:228-236`). Correction is only exposed at attestation (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding_copy.py:117-121`).\n\nThis creates abandonment risk and makes an early typo expensive.\n\n**Recommendation:** add a visible `이전` action only if the domain gets a versioned previous transition. Do not implement client-only navigation. At minimum, expose `건너뛰기` as a button for optional fields; the existing server already accepts the exact text (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_collection.py:243-250`).\n\n### P1 — Four optional questions look mandatory\n`activity_rationale`, `cooking_access`, `budget_band`, and `schedule_constraints` default to empty (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py:31-35`), but the customer must discover that typing `건너뛰기` is allowed (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:235-236`).\n\nUse a one-tap `건너뛰기` button that sends the existing exact value.\n\n### P1 — Daily check-in is input-heavy and has a missing normal digestion option\nThe daily flow has 13 steps (`wizard.py:188-196`). Digestion offers Bristol 1–7, gas/bloating, or “other,” but no visible normal option (`physique_checkin_prompts.py:79-95`). The underlying contract already supports `normal` (`wizard.py:1099-1100`).\n\nThis forces healthy users either to choose a stool type or type manually.\n\n**Recommendation:** add `정상` mapped to the existing `normal` value; retain detailed Bristol options for users who need them.\n\n### P1 — Daily training question contradicts the rest of the time frame\nThe button prompt says `오늘 운동 내용을` while the typed prompt asks about exercise done `어제` (`physique_checkin_prompts.py:108-113`, `:150-152`).\n\nUse:\n\n> 어제 실제로 한 운동이 있다면 부위·종목·시간을 적어 주세요. 없으면 `휴식`이라고 입력해 주세요.\n\n### P2 — Scale instructions omit labels for 2 and 4\nThe UI explains only 1, 3, and 5 (`physique_checkin_prompts.py:65-77`), leaving 2 and 4 ambiguous.\n\nUse:\n\n> 1 매우 나쁨 · 2 나쁨 · 3 보통 · 4 좋음 · 5 매우 좋음\n\n### P2 — Launcher labels are inconsistent\nThe persistent keyboard says `오늘 체크인`, while the inline card says `오늘 체크인 시작` (`telegram.py:6544-6566`, `:6618-6625`).\n\nUse `오늘 체크인` consistently; retain `오늘 체크인 수정` as the only correction entry.\n\n### P2 — Safety/review completion does not tell the customer what to do next\nAfter attestation, the customer sees generic review/safety notices (`telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_notice.py:60-73`).\n\nUse:\n\n> 입력 확인이 저장됐어요. 운영자가 내용을 검토합니다.  \n> 검토가 끝나면 이 토픽에서 안내할게요. 지금은 추가 입력이 필요하지 않습니다.\n\nFor safety hold:\n\n> 건강 관련 답변을 확인하기 위해 코칭을 잠시 보류했습니다.  \n> 증상이나 우려가 있으면 식단 조정보다 의료진 상담을 먼저 받아 주세요.\n\n## Korean replacement copy — onboarding\n\nThe field order remains unchanged.\n\n| Field | Replacement |\n|---|---|\n| `date_of_birth` | `생년월일을 입력해 주세요. 형식: YYYY-MM-DD (예: 1996-08-01)` |\n| `equation_sex_basis` | `열량 계산에 사용할 성별 기준을 선택해 주세요: 남성 / 여성 / 선택 안 함` |\n| `height_cm` | `현재 키를 cm 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 180` |\n| `weight_kg` | `현재 체중을 kg 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 80` |\n| `activity_category` | `평소 활동 수준을 선택해 주세요: 좌식 / 가벼움 / 보통 / 매우 활동적 / 최고 활동` |\n| `activity_rationale` | `주간 운동 횟수와 평소 활동을 알려 주세요. 예: 주 3회 근력 운동, 앉아서 일함` |\n| `goal_type` | `가장 중요한 목표를 선택해 주세요: 감량 / 유지 / 증량` |\n| `target_weight_kg` | `목표 체중을 kg 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 70. 유지라면 없음` |\n| `target_date` | `목표 날짜를 YYYY-MM-DD로 입력해 주세요. 예: 2026-12-31. 유지라면 없음` |\n| `allergies` | `음식 알레르기를 쉼표로 입력해 주세요. 예: 땅콩, 새우. 없으면 없음` |\n| `intolerances` | `음식 불내증을 쉼표로 입력해 주세요. 예: 유당, 밀. 없으면 없음` |\n| `religious_ethical_exclusions` | `종교·윤리상 먹지 않는 식품을 입력해 주세요. 예: 돼지고기. 없으면 없음` |\n| `disliked_foods` | `싫어서 피하는 식품을 입력해 주세요. 예: 고수, 오이. 없으면 없음` |\n| `dietary_preferences` | `선호하는 식품이나 식단을 입력해 주세요. 예: 채식, 고단백. 없으면 없음` |\n| `conditions` | `진단받은 질환이나 건강상 주의할 점을 입력해 주세요. 없으면 없음` |\n| `medications` | `현재 복용 중인 약이나 보충제를 입력해 주세요. 없으면 없음` |\n| `pregnancy_breastfeeding` | `현재 임신 중이거나 수유 중인가요? 예 / 아니오 / 확실하지 않음` |\n| `eating_disorder_risk` | `섭식장애 위험이나 과거력이 있나요? 예 / 아니오 / 확실하지 않음` |\n| `cooking_access` | `사용 가능한 조리 환경을 알려 주세요. 예: 가스레인지와 전자레인지 사용 가능` |\n| `budget_band` | `하루 식비 수준을 알려 주세요. 예: 보통 또는 1인 기준 금액` |\n| `meal_count` | `평소 하루 몇 끼 드시나요? 2~6 중 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 3` |\n| `schedule_constraints` | `식사 시간 제약이 있나요? 예: 12~13시 점심, 아침 거름. 없으면 없음` |\n\n## Korean replacement copy — daily check-in\n\nThe 13-step order is unchanged (`physique_checkin.py:747-761`).\n\n| Step | Replacement |\n|---|---|\n| `bodyweight` | `오늘 아침, 기상 직후 체중을 kg 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 70.2` |\n| `calories` | `어제 먹은 총열량을 kcal 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 2350` |\n| `macros` | `어제 탄수화물·단백질·지방을 g 단위로 입력해 주세요. 순서: 탄수화물 단백질 지방. 예: 280 150 65` |\n| `meals` | `어제 먹은 식사를 끼니별로 편하게 적어 주세요. 간식과 계획에서 벗어난 식사도 포함해 주세요. 예: 아침 오트밀 / 점심 닭가슴살·밥 / 간식 라떼` |\n| `water` | `어제 마신 물의 총량을 L 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 2.5` |\n| `sleep_duration` | `어제 실제로 잔 시간을 시간 숫자로 입력해 주세요. 예: 7.5` |\n| `sleep_quality` | `어제 수면의 질을 선택해 주세요: 1 매우 나쁨 · 2 나쁨 · 3 보통 · 4 좋음 · 5 매우 좋음` |\n| `digestion` | `어제 배변·소화 상태를 선택해 주세요. 불편했다면 가장 가까운 항목을 골라 주세요.` |\n| `condition` | `오늘 컨디션을 선택해 주세요: 1 매우 나쁨 · 2 나쁨 · 3 보통 · 4 좋음 · 5 매우 좋음` |\n| `appetite_stress` | `어제 하루 평균 식욕과 스트레스를 각각 1~5로 입력해 주세요. 예: 식욕 3, 스트레스 2` |\n| `training_summary` | `어제 실제로 한 운동이 있다면 부위·종목·시간을 적어 주세요. 없으면 휴식이라고 입력해 주세요.` |\n| `optional_note` | `어제 기록에 덧붙일 내용이 있나요? 없으면 없음` |\n| `summary` | `오늘 아침 체중과 어제 영양·회복 기록을 확인해 주세요. 맞으면 저장, 고칠 항목은 수정, 나중에 하려면 임시저장을 눌러 주세요.` |\n\n## Conditional daily follow-ups\n\nThese can be inserted after sleep quality, condition, or training (`wizard.py:193-196`).\n\n| Follow-up | Replacement |\n|---|---|\n| `Q-SLEEP-CAUSE` | `수면이 짧거나 질이 낮았다면 가장 가까운 이유를 선택해 주세요.` |\n| `Q-SLEEP-ADJUST` | `오늘 수면을 위해 바꿔 볼 수 있는 행동이 있나요? 예 / 아니오` |\n| `Q-COND-SYMPTOM` | `오늘 컨디션이 낮다면 가장 가까운 상태를 선택해 주세요.` |\n| `Q-COND-INTENSITY` | `오늘 훈련 강도를 어떻게 조정할까요? 유지 / 하향 / 휴식` |\n| `Q-PERF-REASON` | `운동 수행이 계획보다 낮았다면 가장 가까운 이유를 선택해 주세요.` |\n| `Q-PERF-NEXT` | `다음 운동에서 조정을 적용할까요? 예 / 아니오` |\n\nExisting choice values should remain unchanged (`physique_checkin.py:52-58`).\n\n## Recommended input/button simplifications\n\n- Use one-tap keyboards for onboarding closed choices: sex basis, activity, goal, pregnancy, eating-risk, and meal count.\n- For all structured “none” fields, use a button that sends the existing exact text `없음`.\n- For the four optional onboarding fields, use one `건너뛰기` button sending the already-supported literal.\n- Keep macros as one input string to preserve the existing `macros` field contract; improve only its placeholder.\n- Remove the forced English `Meal 1 / Meal 2` format. The field is stored as raw text (`wizard.py:1111-1115`), so natural Korean meal descriptions are sufficient.\n- Add `정상` to digestion, mapped to existing `normal`; keep Bristol detail options for safety-relevant specificity.\n- Use compact labeled 1–5 buttons for all scale questions; callback values remain `a1`–`a5`.\n- Expose an explicit `오늘은 측정 못함` option for weight only if it maps to the existing empty/`None` representation (`wizard.py:1036-1037`, `:1145-1148`). Never substitute `0` or a guessed weight.\n- Remove the duplicate daily optional-note choices (`없음` and navigation `건너뛰기`); show one action only.\n- Standardize all daily entry labels to `오늘 체크인`; retain `오늘 체크인 수정`.\n- Keep `예 / 아니오 / 확실하지 않음` for sensitive safety questions. Do not default uncertainty to `아니오`.\n\nCoverage complete: all 22 onboarding fields, 13 regular daily fields, six conditional daily follow-ups, consent transition, attestation, deferral, summary, and saved-state messaging reviewed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":374839,"turns":28,"tool_calls":67,"output_tokens":17061,"input_tokens":206322,"cache_read_tokens":3776512,"total_tokens":3999895,"generation_ms":357301,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":0.13726783999999997,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9949024729325525,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9481971882333032,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":22,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}