{"task_id":"st_01a05510","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-30T23:45:55.365Z","updated_at":"2026-08-31T11:27:55.522Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"new-customer-goal-review","task_summary":"Audit every new-customer requirement against r44 code","description":"Verify full customer goal","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"<review_type>GOAL & CONSTRAINT VERIFICATION</review_type>\nGoal: prove a real new customer can receive one invite link and proceed without operator repeatedly fixing blockers: invite issuance -> Telegram private DM claim -> consent -> 22-question onboarding -> pause/resume/back/skip/revise -> attestation -> owner review -> membership evidence -> activation -> first daily check-in save. Review current r44 source and installed runtime in /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined and /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/.strict-runtime/62f33e7d-v150. Constraints: no real customer writes/messages/network, disposable fixtures only; capacity five; strict one-use/TTL/auth boundaries; no guard bypass; production currently r44; commit/push forbidden. Break every subrequirement into ACHIEVED/MISSED/PARTIAL with file/line and test evidence. Trace at least five failure/restart paths. Return PASS or FAIL, confidence, blocker_count, and blocking issues. Do not edit files. Stop only after the full flow and all constraints are covered.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as a full r44 goal-and-constraint audit - I traced source, installed runtime, live configuration, focused tests, and restart/failure behavior without modifying production.\n\n# Verdict\n\n**FAIL**\n\n- **confidence:** 0.97\n- **blocker_count:** 2\n- **production runtime:** r44 candidate `62f33e7d4bff114082c4b7be8f3f5e9c9b0a29c2ae4e181a5387105693338d38`\n- **live service:** active and connected since `2026-08-31 01:53:51`\n- **edits/commits/network/customer writes:** none\n\n## Blocking issues\n\n1. **Ambiguous consent-card delivery permanently wedges bootstrap.**  \n   A timeout/network error leaves `recovery_attempts` populated because only definite no-side-effect errors clear it (`telegram.py:12145-12159`). Both normal publication and restart recovery refuse sessions with any recovery attempt (`telegram.py:5795-5796`, `12102-12103`). `RoomBootstrapStore.unresolved_attempts()` exposes the condition, but it has no production caller (`telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:793-802`). An operator must inspect/reconcile the Telegram side effect manually, violating “without operator repeatedly fixing blockers.”\n\n2. **There is no complete disposable proof of the requested chain.**  \n   Tests separately prove issuance/TTL, onboarding, activation domain behavior, membership evidence, and check-in saving, but no test traverses:\n   `invite CLI -> Telegram /start handler -> disabled registration -> consent callback -> 22 questions/navigation -> owner callback -> membership preflight -> activation cutover -> registered customer Telegram check-in save`.  \n   In particular, there is no focused test invoking `TelegramCustomerBootstrapRegistration.handoff_rehearsal_customer()` or `activate_customer_cutover()`. The claim therefore cannot be proven to the requested standard despite most constituent behavior being present.\n\n# Requirement matrix\n\n| Subrequirement | Status | Source evidence | Test/runtime evidence |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| One invite issuance | **ACHIEVED** | `dualcoach_customer_invite.py:137-161`; CLI route `dualcoach_admin.py:1003-1008,1049-1063` | `test_dualcoach_admin_customer_invite.py:67-97`; 41-test gateway set passed |\n| Telegram deep link | **ACHIEVED** | `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:329-360` | Link shape asserted at `test_dualcoach_admin_customer_invite.py:91-95` |\n| Private-DM-only claim | **ACHIEVED** | `telegram.py:12005-12017`; store requires `user == chat`, `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:388-402` | Single-use claim test at `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:54-83` |\n| Disabled registration after claim | **PARTIAL** | Exact DM identity and disabled row: `telegram_customer_bootstrap_registration.py:107-185,267-319` | No direct registration-handler test |\n| Consent card and authenticated claim | **ACHIEVED** | Card `nutrition_coaching.py:3533-3575`; current-card check and callback `telegram.py:6695-6780`; handoff binding `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:712-755` | Consent authority/domain tests included in 188 passing profile tests |\n| 22-question onboarding | **ACHIEVED** | Exact 22 fields `nutrition_onboarding_contract.py:13-36`; ordered collection `nutrition_onboarding.py:189-215` | `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:210-240,384-431`; 188 passed |\n| Pause / resume | **PARTIAL** | Runtime actions `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_callback.py:336-357`; durable status recovery `runtime.py:288-358` | Navigation rendering tested, but no full pause/restart/resume integration |\n| Back | **ACHIEVED** | Rewind truncates later answers: `runtime.py:669-730`; callback `runtime_callback.py:324-334` | Navigation controls `test_customer_nutrition_ux.py:112-138`; restart cursor test `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:183-207` |\n| Skip | **ACHIEVED** | Optional-only skip `runtime_callback.py:358-368`; text equivalent `runtime_collection.py:244-252` | Optional navigation exposed at `test_customer_nutrition_ux.py:112-138` |\n| Revise | **ACHIEVED** | Customer revise `runtime_callback.py:370-379`; owner digest-bound revise `runtime_callback.py:457-526` | `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:278-328,438-507` |\n| Customer attestation | **ACHIEVED** | `nutrition_onboarding.py:217-276`; callback `runtime_callback.py:381-387` | `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:210-240` |\n| Owner review | **ACHIEVED** | Route/member/current-card guards `runtime_callback.py:143-297`; decision handling `457-539` | Owner preflight/recovery tests passed in 41-test gateway set |\n| Ready artifact finalization | **ACHIEVED** | `nutrition_onboarding_finalize_service.py:17-59`; runtime finalization `runtime.py:270-286` | Finalization fixture in `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:593+`; 188 passed |\n| Staff membership evidence | **PARTIAL** | Fresh absence query `telegram_staff_membership_gate.py:277-363`; evidence and five-minute TTL `499-572,575-673` | Faults fail before mutation: `test_staff_membership_activation_gate.py:29-63`; no cutover-wrapper integration |\n| Activation | **PARTIAL** | Membership-before-write and committed bootstrap transition `dualcoach_activation_cutover.py:146-220,309-442`; direct enable forbidden `customer_admin.py:740-754` | Activation domain/restart tests included in 188 passed; no `activate_customer_cutover()` end-to-end test |\n| First daily check-in save | **ACHIEVED** | Enabled registry creates customer-bound bridge `nutrition_coaching.py:2360-2382`; launcher/save `3827-3848,3976-4050`; canonical event save `wizard.py:867-1001` | `test_customer_nutrition_wizard.py:9-51`; UX completion `test_customer_nutrition_ux.py:267-312` |\n| Capacity five | **ACHIEVED** | Invite checks current enabled count `dualcoach_customer_invite.py:118-133`; activation validates bounded capacity `customer_admin.py:1046-1055` | Five accepted at `test_multi_customer_registry.py:76-98`; production registry says capacity 5, one enabled |\n| One-use invite | **ACHIEVED** | Claimed token leaves `PREPARED`, making reuse unavailable: `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:365-414` | `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:54-83` |\n| 24-hour TTL | **ACHIEVED** | `_INVITE_TTL`, `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:26,343` | Exact boundary test `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:30-51` |\n| Strict route/auth boundaries | **ACHIEVED** | Private DM, actor, route, generation, publication and membership checks above | Wrong route/order tests `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:157-180`; staff evidence faults; authority probe succeeded |\n| No guard bypass | **ACHIEVED** | Activation CLI requires external Task26 pin/candidate `dualcoach_admin.py:1021-1031,1064-1109`; direct enable rejected | Installed authority successfully authorized exact r44 candidate with event count 20 |\n| Production is r44 | **ACHIEVED** | Running process uses `62f33e7d-v150`; wheel `direct_url.json` points to `task-v15r44-candidate` | Nine critical installed files byte-match source; systemd environment pins that runtime |\n| No customer/network writes during review | **ACHIEVED** | Live profile only read | All behavioral execution used pytest `tmp_path`; no Telegram/API calls |\n\n# Failure and restart traces\n\n1. **Expired invite:** at exactly 24 hours it transitions to `EXPIRED`; claim rejected.  \n   Evidence: `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:30-51`.\n\n2. **Invite replay:** second claim after successful DM claim is rejected.  \n   Evidence: `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap_invite_ttl.py:54-83`.\n\n3. **Gateway restart during registration/consent:** `REGISTERING` is re-handed off and `AWAITING_CONSENT` is republished when no unresolved provider attempt exists.  \n   Evidence: `telegram.py:5755-5823`.\n\n4. **Restart during question collection:** answers and cursor survive; status exposes no answer values.  \n   Evidence: `test_nutrition_onboarding.py:183-207`.\n\n5. **Duplicate Telegram update:** consumed-update replay returns durable status instead of reapplying business state.  \n   Evidence: `runtime.py:641-667`, `runtime_collection.py:133-167`.\n\n6. **Onboarding publication restart:** receipted outbox entries reconcile to committed publication without another send.  \n   Evidence: `runtime_publication_transport.py:67-119,332-387`.\n\n7. **Activation crash/restart:** prepared activation journal is reconciled; rollback failures retain explicit recovery state.  \n   Evidence: `test_customer_admin.py:1407-1535`.\n\n8. **Check-in restart:** active draft rehydrates and resumes; completed same-day check-in reopens without duplicate event.  \n   Evidence: `test_telegram_physique_checkin.py:435-455`; `test_customer_nutrition_wizard.py:54-73`.\n\n9. **Blocking consent-send ambiguity:** timeout may have delivered, but unresolved attempt prevents automatic retry and restart recovery.  \n   Evidence: `telegram.py:12145-12159`, `5795-5796`, `12102-12103`.\n\n# Verification executed\n\n- Gateway/bootstrap/onboarding recovery: **41 passed**\n- Domain onboarding/activation/membership/check-in: **188 passed**\n- Check-in synchronous gateway cases: **49 passed**\n- Installed r44 authority probe: **AUTHORIZED**, event count 20\n- Installed/source critical-file comparison: **9/9 byte-identical**\n- Broad `test_telegram_physique_checkin.py`: 49 synchronous tests pass; 41 async cases could not execute because this checkout lacks `pytest-asyncio`. This is a verification-environment gap, not counted as a product failure.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":272383,"turns":15,"tool_calls":56,"output_tokens":12265,"input_tokens":278921,"cache_read_tokens":2070016,"total_tokens":2361202,"generation_ms":256346,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":2.7975630000000002,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9575786870921564,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8812565002807653,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":9,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}