{"task_id":"st_01a058f7","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-31T17:56:45.061Z","updated_at":"2026-08-31T18:14:50.522Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"wave1-card-receipt-fix","task_summary":"Implement Todo 3 receipt state and headers","description":"Fix typed receipt variants and visible headers","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Close the single remaining Todo 3 receipt/header blocker with a focused HEAVY fix. You are a fresh executor; inspect current files rather than trusting prior claims. DELIVERABLE: Typed receipt variants, visible value-free transition headers, focused RED->GREEN tests, full related gateway regression pass, manual/visual evidence, cleanup, and updated task-3 evidence/DoneClaim. SCOPE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/physique_checkin.py`, dedicated `tests/gateway/test_customer_nutrition_stepper_card.py`, and only narrowly necessary existing tests in `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py`; task-3 evidence. Do not edit bindings/profile/telegram/stepper/scripts/plan. CURRENT FACTS: correction pre-bind persistence is already deferred in `open_nutrition_correction`; u callback, unknown 12/12, nutrition l rejection, previous label/actions/privacy are already implemented. Remaining source maps actions `unknown/edit/save` else `selected`, so known and previous both use selected and cards have no visible confirmation header. FIRST write failing tests using the real bridge/service that prove machine variants are distinct for known, unknown, edited, previous, launch, resume, invalid, stale, summary, terminal; prove committed known/unknown/edited cards visibly begin with a value-free receipt header; previous has a distinct navigation header without claiming a save; launch/resume/invalid/stale have no false commit header. Use a typed StrEnum/result contract rather than arbitrary strings. Then implement the smallest bridge-only fix, prepending the receipt header to the same single next-question WizardPrompt (no extra Telegram operation, no value echo). VERIFY: dedicated card suite, customer_nutrition_ux, telegram_physique_checkin, full nutrition_coaching 76/76, projection suite, LSP/Ruff/type/compile. MANUAL QA: zero-network actual WizardService/Bridge driver covers known/unknown/edited/previous/launch/resume/invalid/stale/summary/terminal, correction pre-bind no persistence then message 44 persistence, and prints JSON PASS/value_echo false; Korean terminal visual transcript/tui-check width <=80. Delete temp assets. EVIDENCE: replace/update `task-3-card-renderer.json` with current hashes including nutrition_coaching test if modified, exact RED/GREEN/manual/visual/cleanup and prior blocker closure. No commit/network/customer messages. STOP WHEN: source itself has distinct typed variants and visible headers, all named suites/manual PASS, temp absent, DoneClaim returned.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as evidence-path correction only - copied and byte-verified.\n\nSource SHA-256: `b26ecd259b4aa797cd65bfe29f2cf36cdc8d242efc2f0ead90f55f481f520383`  \nDestination SHA-256: `b26ecd259b4aa797cd65bfe29f2cf36cdc8d242efc2f0ead90f55f481f520383`\n\nAccidental source duplicate retained because its directory contains other pre-existing evidence.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":174702,"turns":5,"tool_calls":5,"output_tokens":4624,"input_tokens":12053,"cache_read_tokens":443904,"total_tokens":460581,"generation_ms":172160,"tokens_per_second":27,"cost_usd":0.420937,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9879271623032233,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.973565489728198,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":35,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}