{"task_id":"st_01a05ac3","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T02:18:51.386Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T02:28:40.612Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"verify-r71-r3-source-freeze","task_summary":"Preflight frozen r71 source with disposable candidate","description":"Verify r3 source freeze before seal","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Independent adversarial pre-seal verification of Todo 8 r3 source freeze; no authoritative r3 creation. DELIVERABLE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-8-r71-r3-preseal-verify.json` with verdict confirmed/needs-fix, confidence, blocker_count, evidence, cleanup. IMPLEMENTATION ROOT `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined`; evidence/migration roots as recorded. HARD: no Git/GitHub, source/test edits, authoritative r3/build/input/preseal/authority/execution/runtime/observer root creation, network/service/customer/commit. Verify actual current hashes exactly match source-freeze receipt and no file changes during run. Confirm r1/r2 full tree digests/modes unchanged and excluded, r3/effect roots absent. Independently run all 10 files LSP/Ruff/ty/basedpyright/compile and require zero; focused closure/sealer suite 19 PASS; occupied successor sentinel preserved; r3 default and typed r2 fixture selection correct; no private import/Any/cast/ignore/noqa/unused result/assertion weakening; all overlay protected paths including test_nutrition_coaching. Build Hermes/profile twice from fresh clean copied inputs under unique DISPOSABLE `/tmp` roots only; require A/B byte-identical, ZIP CRC/RECORD/source-member parity and Todo7 receipt binding. Create a disposable non-authoritative candidate under `/tmp` (never name/use authoritative r3), seal once with the exact current inputs/authority receipt, run candidate input verifier and require `NUTRICOACH_V150_CANDIDATE_PASS`. Adversarially test occupied disposable successor, mutated member, missing overlay reject. Remove every disposable build/candidate/input/fault/cache root and prove absent. Recheck authoritative r3/effect roots still absent and r1/r2 unchanged. Return confirmed only if this exact frozen source is safe for one authoritative r3 seal.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as independent adversarial pre-seal verification - completed all gates and recorded the result.\n\nCreated:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-8-r71-r3-preseal-verify.json`\n\nVerdict: **confirmed**  \nConfidence: **0.99**  \nBlockers: **0**\n\nVerified 10-file diagnostics, 19 tests, reproducible wheels, disposable candidate PASS, adversarial rejection cases, complete cleanup, unchanged r1/r2, and continued absence of authoritative r3/effect roots.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":589048,"turns":28,"tool_calls":68,"output_tokens":27626,"input_tokens":225985,"cache_read_tokens":4163584,"total_tokens":4417195,"generation_ms":566570,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":4.040497,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9934243314253088,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9485177246331018,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":56,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}