{"task_id":"st_01a05ad0","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T02:33:38.306Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T02:40:18.705Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"verify-r71-candidate-final","task_summary":"Verify sealed r71 candidate r3 end to end","description":"Adversarially verify authoritative r71 candidate","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Fresh independent final AdversarialVerify for approved Todo 8 authoritative r71 candidate. DELIVERABLE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-8-adversarial-verify.json` and JSON verdict confirmed/needs-fix confidence/blocker_count/evidence/repro. READ-ONLY except evidence. IMPLEMENTATION ROOT `/home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined`; authoritative candidate root `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v15r71-candidate-r3`. No Git/GitHub, edits, builds that mutate retained roots, preseal/authority/execution/runtime/observer creation, network/service/customer/commit. Verify actual r3 root exists, immutable modes, complete manifest/inventory/qualification, tree/manifest/candidate digests match receipt, candidate input verifier PASS and exact `NUTRICOACH_V150_CANDIDATE_PASS`. Independently validate both embedded wheels CRC/all RECORD digest+size/count, expected hashes, package metadata, all 47 successor overlay/source member bindings including every Todo1-7 changed/new wheel source and tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py. Rehash all frozen 10 current source files and require source stream unchanged; rerun strict LSP/Ruff/ty/basedpyright/compile zero and closure/sealer tests19. Verify Todo7 receipts/counts/blocker0 truthfully bind authority receipt. Prove r1/r2 tree digests/modes unchanged and excluded; none of r1/r2/r3 digests in ambient registry; r3 sole Todo9 selection by exact manifest path/digest. Reproduce adversarial rejection using disposable copies only: mutate member, remove required overlay, occupied successor; clean all. Prove A/B build/input/temp roots absent and all r71 preseal/effect roots absent; forbidden effects zero. Return confirmed only if authoritative r3 is safe and complete for Todo9.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as final delivery of the independent Todo 8 adversarial verdict - verification is complete and the requested evidence is written.\n\nVerdict: `confirmed`  \nConfidence: `0.99`  \nBlockers: `0`\n\nEvidence:\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-8-adversarial-verify.json`\n\nSHA-256: `43341f96feeccbbb7ce8a5f742a131471f8c23cf1c316f79f3b37d14d5b7630f`\n\nVerified canonical sentinel, 19 tests, strict diagnostics, wheels/RECORD/overlay bindings, adversarial rejection, immutable predecessors, registry exclusion, root absence, and final retained-root/source integrity.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":400222,"turns":26,"tool_calls":57,"output_tokens":18101,"input_tokens":209183,"cache_read_tokens":2972160,"total_tokens":3199444,"generation_ms":375096,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":3.0750250000000006,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9939688867030777,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9342469516804696,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":57,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}