{"task_id":"st_01a05b0e","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T03:41:42.386Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T03:48:10.498Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"verify-next-cron-no-send","task_summary":"Calculate next cron eligibility without authority execution","description":"Prove upcoming cron ticks have no sends","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Read-only safety oracle for controlled r70 restart. ONE DELIVERABLE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-next-cron-no-send.json` with verdict SAFE_TO_RESTART or UNSAFE/BLOCKED, current timestamp, exact next three minute ticks, per-tick due-send count, evidence, cleanup. LIVE profile `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest`; implementation and installed r70 runtime paths from debug receipts. No Git/GitHub, source/live-state edits, activation authority/coordinator execution, cron tick execution, observer append, service restart, network/customer/provider action. This is materially different from relocated-profile simulation: inspect actual scheduler/nutrition-coaching eligibility pure decision path and current sanitized scheduling metadata, then call only side-effect-free eligibility/calculation functions or reproduce their typed predicates against an in-memory snapshot. Do not bypass a predicate that can make a send eligible; enumerate every admitted customer and every possible card/send reason without exposing values. For each exact next three scheduled minute timestamps after capture, prove whether any Telegram send/update could be attempted. Also inspect current delivery/idempotency ledgers and quiet windows. Activation authority identity is irrelevant because no job execution occurs; classify separately. Require `due_send_count=0`, `due_update_count=0`, and no uncertain pending delivery for all three ticks before SAFE_TO_RESTART. Cross-check source with installed r70 runtime hashes. Recheck live data/draft unchanged and r71 launcher0/roots absent. Remove temp/cache. STOP when restart safety is evidence-bound; do not perform restart.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only restart-safety audit - the required evidence is complete.\n\nVerdict: **UNSAFE/BLOCKED**\n\n- Each next tick has `due_send_count=1`, `due_update_count=0`.\n- Two Topic-59 delivery slots remain uncertain in `sending`.\n- No restart, cron tick, network action, or live-state edit occurred.\n- JSON validated with no diagnostics.\n\nEvidence: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-next-cron-no-send.json`  \nSHA-256: `bd07ae45e84b318e565cf09625cd8299c16ea51b72f3cf156149e93d74851af7`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":387930,"turns":19,"tool_calls":63,"output_tokens":19346,"input_tokens":210786,"cache_read_tokens":2670592,"total_tokens":2900724,"generation_ms":375325,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":2.969606,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9930238152513832,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9268454191015549,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":66,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}