{"task_id":"st_01a05c3d","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T09:12:24.580Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T10:49:50.443Z","notification":{"run_epoch":3,"notified_epoch":3},"name":"verify-r71b-controller-source","task_summary":"Verify hold transaction watch confirm and rollback","description":"Adversarially verify r71b controller source","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Fresh independent AdversarialVerify of r71b controller/preparer source increment. DELIVERABLE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`, verdict confirmed/needs-fix confidence/blocker_count/evidence/repro/cleanup. READ-ONLY except evidence. WORKTREE exact; no Git/GitHub, source edits, package builds/seals, live/profile/service/network/customer/provider actions. Hash-match all 13 sources + 9 tests from corrected receipt and detect any omitted changed files. Inspect actual implementations, not source-string assertions. Verify explicit maintenance args/no defaults; scope/oracle derives exact successor config/projection/route/customer/slot and two-stage digest; credential/hold/dropin bytes/modes. Trace controller phases and prove MAINTENANCE_ARMED and START_WATCH_ARMED precede service start, inotify subscription before trigger, output persisted before jobs status, MAINTENANCE_CONFIRMED before COMMITTING. Test watcher with real atomic replace/close events, wrong names/events, timeout <=120, no sleep/poll. Verify exact known-r70 exception fingerprint cannot be spoofed by changed job/runtime/evidence/ledger and all other cron errors block. Run every phase fault/crash/recovery, rollback scheduler pause before predecessor restart and exact cron/config/dropin/credential/hold restore; roll-forward only after valid confirm; replay/old approval/occupied roots fail closed. Manual fake-host lifecycle must COMMIT with provider/network/customer0, one audit, ledger unchanged; failure paths must not commit. Run corrected120 plus maintenance runtime affected240 and exact relevant controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer suites. Strict LSP/Ruff/ty/basedpyright/compile/import/no-excuse; AST scan no Any/cast/ignore/noqa/broad catch/sleep/private shortcuts/assertion weakening; LOC. Verify no disposable/authoritative roots or live effects and old r71 hashes unchanged. Confirm only if controller source is ready for disposable packaging.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as final two-blocker verification - both are closed.\n\nVerdict: **confirmed**  \nConfidence: **0.99**  \nBlockers: **0**  \nDisposable packaging ready: **yes**\n\nVerification:\n- Focused: 120 passed\n- Maintenance: 240 passed\n- Controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer: 81 passed\n- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, LSP: clean\n- Exact Task10 substitution matrix: passed\n- Commit, terminal rollback, replay no-op, and fresh-host confirmed recovery: passed\n- No package/live roots or effects\n\nEvidence:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`\n\nSHA-256: `b6f8ad72fc389fde50cf448ea2d0b9c5de2cabb3b44cb45c5378d7a59697e1c1`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":292681,"turns":12,"tool_calls":59,"output_tokens":12690,"input_tokens":39463,"cache_read_tokens":3917824,"total_tokens":3969977,"generation_ms":263259,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":4.883503999999999,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9951102824779259,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9900277639706193,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":74,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}