{"task_id":"st_01a05cac","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T11:13:43.694Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T12:53:57.981Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"verify-r71b-disposable-package","task_summary":"Rebuild and verify r71b package qualification","description":"Adversarially verify disposable r71b package","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Fresh independent AdversarialVerify of DISPOSABLE_PACKAGE_PASS; authoritative roots remain forbidden. DELIVERABLE: `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-disposable-package-adversarial.json`, verdict confirmed/needs-fix confidence/blocker_count/evidence/cleanup. WORKTREE exact. No Git/GitHub, source edits, live/network/customer/provider, authoritative r71b roots. Rehash complete source/test inventory from runtime/controller/package receipts and verify old r71 tombstones unchanged. Independently build clean A/B Hermes/profile wheels twice under fresh /tmp; require exact expected hashes or explain deterministic mismatch, byte-identical, ZIP CRC/all RECORD and every wheel-hosted maintenance/controller/observer source parity including dispatch_result. Seal independent disposable candidate from exact three Task10 evidence files; verify candidate input/source381/evidence3, omission/malformed/path/schema/status/hash/tamper18/consistent rewrite/old approval rejection. Prepare disposable preseal with exact Sep2 02:00-02:30 window; independently reconstruct binding inputs/scope/oracle from authoritative sources, package_binding and final package digests, hold/authority/credential/target manifests; validate quiet-path non-Topic59 due0 and old sending slots unchanged. Run installed wheels outside source/PYTHONPATH empty/socket guard: exact sealed74, maintenance61, actual disposable COMMITTED, preconfirm terminal paused rollback service running, fresh confirmed recovery real post_fence, 13+maintenance rehearsal external0. Manual Sep2 02:00/02:01 two noops/audit1/ledger unchanged/provider-network-customer0/no second write; Sep3 normal fake path1. Run source suites maintenance238/controller129/final39/candidate27 and strict diagnostics/no-excuse. Fault copies mutate wheel/RECORD/source/evidence/hold/oracle/credential/phase and require rejection. Cleanup every verifier temp. Prove authoritative candidate/preseal/preflight/auth/execution/rehearsal/observer/profile maintenance roots absent. Confirm only if exact frozen source is safe for one authoritative seal.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as regenerated YAML-package re-verification - completed without source or live changes.\n\n**DISPOSABLE_PACKAGE_PASS — confirmed**\n\n- Blockers: `0`\n- Safe for one authoritative r2 seal: `true`\n- Evidence SHA-256: `774e9fbab68d33c7e533210f72fb5d8b0f31355083b4d58111e0f733e6381dd2`\n\nUpdated evidence:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-disposable-package-adversarial.json`\n\nVerified exact candidate, manifest, binding, final package, hold, authority, A/B wheels, all requested test counts, YAML negatives, no-call oracle, failed-attempt preservation, cleanup, and authoritative-root absence.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":302901,"turns":14,"tool_calls":35,"output_tokens":12418,"input_tokens":315173,"cache_read_tokens":3714560,"total_tokens":4042151,"generation_ms":262890,"tokens_per_second":47,"cost_usd":6.0054669999999994,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9934785951984398,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9217881184683948,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":76,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}