{"task_id":"st_01a05ccb","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T11:46:49.805Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T11:54:17.927Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"prepare-r71b-authority-receipt-r2","task_summary":"Bind authority receipt and qualify candidate r2","description":"Create truthful r71b authority receipt and retry proof","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Recover authoritative r71b packaging after immutable candidate attempt1 omitted authority-verification receipt. DELIVERABLE: canonical truthful authority receipt + disposable candidate-r2/preseal proof evidence `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-candidate-r2-recovery.json`, expected digests, blocker0 or exact blocker. No source edits, Git, live/profile/service, network/provider/customer, authorization/execution/observer. Preserve failed authoritative candidate `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v150-combined/task-v15r71b-maintenance-candidate` byte/mode-identical tombstone; preseal/action roots absent. Read failed root/manifest, final source freeze, runtime/controller/disposable confirmed receipts. Create canonical `task-10-r71b-authority-verification.json` under plan evidence with schema, product generation r71/package namespace, source-freeze inventory74/hash-stream, exact current source hashes, runtime/controller/disposable verifier SHA/verdict/confidence/blocker0, test counts/strict gates/manual zero-call, old tombstones, forbidden effects and intended window. Validate every referenced receipt/hash and current source; no self-claim. Materialize a fresh one-use authority-receipt input root for sealing only after validation, with `authority-verification.json`; prove nonempty and verifier-compatible. Use sealer CLI arbitrary successor support to seal a DISPOSABLE candidate from exact same frozen inputs/expected wheels plus receipt; model final authoritative path `task-v15r71b-maintenance-candidate-r2` without source edits. Verify outer basename is not candidate-digest input and preseal can explicitly bind r2 manifest path. Build/verify disposable r2 candidate/preseal with Sep2 02:00-02:30 window, run candidate/preseal canonical verifiers and receipt omission/tamper/empty-root/foreign receipt guards, compute new expected candidate/package binding/final package/hold/authority digests. Re-run minimal installed no-call oracle if digest binding affects runtime. Remove all disposable/receipt temp roots; retain only canonical plan evidence receipts. Prove authoritative candidate-r2/preseal/preflight/rehearsal/action/live roots absent and failed attempt unchanged. Write exact recovery sequence for one authoritative r2 seal; no seal now.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as completed recovery evidence delivery - I validated, modeled, guarded, cleaned up, and left authoritative roots untouched.\n\nDelivered:\n\n- Authority receipt: `task-10-r71b-authority-verification.json`\n  - SHA-256: `684cfd9b38b5fda5e6582bb41496f7d6fd1b0f2cb227ed6b955107e2c1a1a26e`\n- Recovery proof: `task-10-r71b-candidate-r2-recovery.json`\n  - SHA-256: `7c8b22a7dd276375ca7eb13e3d90eb5813a37f125a66277cc33be10997650157`\n\nExpected digests:\n\n- Candidate: `4abeff79a8a908a6c7055759d62f50ac93b03946997b29bde17f01cb1cdde0dc`\n- Package binding: `e176c96ce141f2b43b86f9ad2e7f580bf7077e95c6198fe384715c625c197a22`\n- Final package: `1a95c66f158de29ef966cd80ffc26094fdceca9c522a9056e83f95a500640484`\n- Hold ID: `39ec3d5cb516694165a4ff02d1f42ef94b5c899a41da6e3d6c8a747ded1fa76c`\n- Hold SHA-256: `f4d29cca9563752e99ff200611d848379e8ce0d4a9495a9a22c1089bf45bf3c8`\n- Authority SHA-256: `bc4e1aa35d497c87a7b3a06bf23cf3c2c370cb52dd5f921a3cf4c161ce3ecaae`\n\nVerification:\n\n- Blockers: `0`\n- Canonical candidate verifier passed on two differently named disposable roots with identical digest.\n- Receipt omission, empty-root, foreign-receipt, tamper, and authority guards rejected.\n- Preseal derivation replay passed; r2 manifest and authoritative preseal paths are explicitly bound.\n- Focused tests: `20 passed`.\n- Installed-wheel no-call oracle passed with zero claim/send/edit/network/provider/customer calls.\n- All 74 frozen source hashes revalidated.\n- Failed attempt1 remains unchanged: 418 entries, tree SHA-256 `c67c4b55f8fc36e12238a6401532a2d7bd67c158985fe9645e0da3603c3499ab`.\n- All disposable roots removed; authoritative candidate-r2, preseal, preflight, rehearsal, authorization, execution, observer, and profile roots remain absent.\n- No source, Git, live/service/profile, network/provider/customer, authorization/execution/observer action occurred.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":447920,"turns":21,"tool_calls":43,"output_tokens":20750,"input_tokens":163083,"cache_read_tokens":2306048,"total_tokens":2489881,"generation_ms":418441,"tokens_per_second":50,"cost_usd":2.5909389999999997,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9913693977081984,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.933951256535194,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":78,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}