{"task_id":"st_01a05d13","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T13:05:52.187Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T13:10:25.274Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"seal-r71b-authoritative-r3","task_summary":"Create final authoritative r71b package roots","description":"Seal r71b candidate r3 from unique inputs","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: One-use authoritative r71b candidate-r3/preseal/permission/rehearsal seal using exact recovery manifest; no source edits/live actions. DELIVERABLE `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-authoritative-package.json`, DoneClaim or fail-closed blocker. Read task-10-r71b-candidate-r3-overlay-recovery.json. BEFORE writes: current time < Sep2 02:30, final freeze134 current, all exact authoritative input-r3/candidate-r3/preseal/preflight/rehearsal/build/action/live roots absent, failed attempt1/r2 trees exact. Create exactly unique input root `task-v15r71b-maintenance-inputs-r3` from current source and prewrite hash manifest; generate successor-overlay as fresh inode/current `SUCCESSOR_OVERLAY_PATHS`, require SHA `8241dde7...52b`, current r71b_preparation hash, nonempty receipt515a..., exact wheels. No read/path/hardlink/reference to either failed r71b candidate or stale overlay. Verify every input path/size/hash then make immutable. Seal exactly candidate-r3 once; require candidate digest2a85524e...43f6, manifest9c90..., qualification, canonical verifier. Prepare exact immutable r71b preseal+permission and rehearsal explicitly bound candidate-r3, window Sep2 02:00-02:30; require binding d2902c...5145, final98146e...fbd4, hold/authority hashes, canonical verifiers, 13+maintenance external0, installed no-call. Postseal NO edits: source freeze/strict/tests/verifiers. Retain immutable failed1/r2+input-r3/candidate-r3/preseal/permission/rehearsal; remove build A/B/temp/fault/cache. Prove auth/execution/runtime/profile hold/observer absent, r70 live unchanged, network/provider/customer0. Mismatch stops; never delete/reuse.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as delivering either the authoritative r71b package or a fail-closed blocker - the blocker receipt is complete and immutable.\n\n`BLOCKED_FAIL_CLOSED`: current Topic-59 ledger had zero projections for `2026-09-02`; exactly one was required.\n\n- Candidate-r3 sealed once and verified: `2a85524e...43f6`\n- Input-r3 and candidate-r3 retained immutable\n- Partial preseal/preflight retained without deletion or reuse\n- No rehearsal, authorization, execution, live, network, provider, or customer actions\n- Evidence: `task-10-r71b-authoritative-package.json`\n- Evidence SHA-256: `d0223859fb768e8adb2c9130aceb0459d542465c1bd7c11587adb5810d02c0f7`\n- JSON diagnostics: clean","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":272894,"turns":13,"tool_calls":39,"output_tokens":13422,"input_tokens":101553,"cache_read_tokens":742400,"total_tokens":857375,"generation_ms":262523,"tokens_per_second":51,"cost_usd":1.281625,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9839254241607033,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8796698394341865,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":82,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}