{"task_id":"st_01a05d18","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T13:11:13.131Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T15:11:12.796Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"analyze-sep2-zero-projection-recovery","task_summary":"Prove Sep2 restart and original r71 are zero-send safe","description":"Verify zero-projection safe original r71 path","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"GOAL: Determine whether the authoritative Sep2 zero-Topic59 projection makes the smaller original verified r71 live path safe with zero customer/provider calls, allowing r70 cron recovery after day rollover and avoiding the partial r71b package. ONE DELIVERABLE `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-sep2-zero-projection-recovery.json`, verdict RECOVERABLE/NO, exact event-driven sequence. READ-ONLY. No Git, source/live edits, restart, job/observer/launcher, network/customer/provider. Read r71b authoritative blocker/partial roots, current config/weekly authority/tasks/ledgers, installed r70 scheduler/dispatcher, original r71 candidate-r3/preseal/permission/rehearsal and audits, observer fix evidence. Prove why `2026-09-02` has zero Topic59 projections: correct Tuesday/business rules and current authoritative data, not parser/preparer defect. Compute side-effect eligibility for exact early Sep2 ticks (00:01-00:03 and 02:00-02:02) using pure current predicates: Topic59/daily/reminder/cutoff/activation/owner sends, edits, uncertain retry; require due send/update0 while historical sending slots remain no-retry. Trace a fresh r70 restart at that timestamp: pin reacquisition, job run, cron status ok/no-op and provider0. Determine how to wait/subscribe safely and run one observer-r70 oneshot after fixed root selection to PASS. Re-run original r71 candidate/preseal canonical verifiers read-only; assess protected inventory/current profile drift and whether capture/verify preflight can still pass after safe cron/observer recovery. Verify original r71 launcher roots absent and approval unused; partial r71b input/candidate/preseal/preflight roots can remain immutable tombstones without path/authority collision. If RECOVERABLE, give exact minimum timestamps/checks/restart once/cron event/observer/preflight/original launcher sequence and no-replay rules. If not, name exact blocker. No customer values.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as a delta window re-adjudication - I recomputed the live predicates and wrote the requested addendum.\n\nCreated:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-sep2-window-addendum.json`\n\nVerdict: **RECOVERABLE**, conditional on the fresh 00:29 gate remaining zero.\n\n- Ticks 00:30/31/32: send 0, update 0, uncertain retry 0.\n- Original r71 verifiers: PASS.\n- Original r71 action roots: absent; approval unused.\n- r71b partial roots: unchanged, separate tombstones.\n- Exact event-driven wake/restart/cron/observer/preflight/launcher sequence included.\n\nValidation passed. SHA-256: `91417ee0873d5b1002e73cf95a02d27bdaef9b6de4f706874a0a58c0cf3f3b60`.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":250923,"turns":6,"tool_calls":15,"output_tokens":11397,"input_tokens":281615,"cache_read_tokens":1353216,"total_tokens":1646228,"generation_ms":245616,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":2.986045,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9968277557086108,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.827740604380514,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":83,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}