{"task_id":"st_01a05dbb","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident","parent_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","root_session_id":"01a04e1a-4e0a-7c69-845d-0b5d1e71f82d","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-09-01T16:09:44.149Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T16:22:01.751Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"verify-final-r71-production","task_summary":"Audit live r71 receipts health and zero-customer state","description":"Verify committed r71 production independently","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Fresh independent read-only + offline-temp AdversarialVerify of final original r71 production. DELIVERABLE `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71-production-adversarial-final.json`, verdict confirmed/needs-fix confidence/blocker_count. No source/live/service/profile edits, Git, cron/manual job, observer, network/provider/customer. Validate immutable package digest4b0327/candidatea41c97/preseal verifier under supported sealed interpreter, launcher invocation exactly1/no retry, authorization schema/status CONSUMED/SUCCEEDED, execution phase COMMITTED, successor/current authority/runtime exact and no r71b selection. Service active/running PID stable across two event-driven reads, NRestarts0, effective Restart=always, temporary runtime override absent, unit/dropins/credentials/wheel origins exact, startup health/sockets clean, bounded journal no errors. Natural cron latest Sep2 ok/no-op and next future; reconstruct due0 proof, provider/send/update0 and no manual tick. Rehash all protected config/registry/customer event/binding/drafts/scheduled delivery/fence/Topic59 bytes vs pre-transaction evidence; require unchanged. Verify capacity5/inboxOFF/invite/two bindings/draft preservation/projection valid; no customer or provider events. Inspect r71b roots unchanged tombstones and observer-r71 absent. Run installed-wheel legacy/current stepper lifecycle and malformed ingress manual oracles only in temp isolated paths with network adapter counters0; no production mutation. Run canonical post-live verifier if immutable copy exists. Return confirmed only blocker0.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1353625,"final_response":"I read this as completion of the phase-aware delta re-review - the corrected evidence now confirms production with zero blockers.\n\nUpdated:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71-production-adversarial-final.json`\n\nResult:\n- Verdict: `confirmed`\n- Confidence: `0.995`\n- Blocker count: `0`\n- Evidence SHA-256: `0b5ea436a4a6cfbc7a82ca8d4d4d524c54c82fb3e36aafcec633bfa90dbe1842`\n- JSON and LSP validation: clean\n\nExact sealed derivations matched current config and registry byte-for-byte. Service remained active on PID `3376522` with `NRestarts=0`; protected customer and delivery hashes remained unchanged. No live actions or edits occurred.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":310022,"turns":10,"tool_calls":36,"output_tokens":15027,"input_tokens":66339,"cache_read_tokens":2477056,"total_tokens":2558422,"generation_ms":287928,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":2.3410720000000005,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9945660690921946,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9739171461766655,"token_status":"complete","cost_status":"reported","duration_status":"monotonic"},"task_seq":88,"config_generation":0,"background_mode":"background"}